Biological features of ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical role and basis for treatment individualization

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an extremely heterogeneous disease in terms of clinical manifestations, morphological changes, and expression of biomarkers, which determine the risk of subsequent development of an invasive breast cancer (BC). Diagnosis and treatment of DCIS prevents the development of invasive tumors (which reduces the potential risk of death from BC); however, the prognostic value of local treatment depends on the biological characteristics of its. The tumor grade, presence of comedonecrosis and expression of estrogen receptors are the key prognostic factors in DCIS for the treatment tactics and prognosis. The clinical symptoms of DCIS are very scarce, the most of tumors is diagnosed by screening mammography; the typical sign of DCIS is malignant microcalcifications or changes of breast architectonic. The sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound and MRI directly depend on the biological characteristics of DCIS. Surgical treatment (breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy) significantly reduces the risk of BC death in women with DCIS G2/G3, and radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery reduce the risk of local recurrence of non-invasive and invasive BC. The choice of the local treatment (breast-conserving surgery ± radiation therapy vs mastectomy) depend on such factors as: tumor size, localization, clear margins, and biological characteristics of DCIS. In contrast to invasive cancers, the negative margin in DCIS is more than 2 mm from the tumor. Regional lymph node involvement in DCIS occurs in less than 1% of cases; however, microinvasion is found in analyze the surgical specimen in 15% of patients, which raises the question about regional staging. Risk factors for microinvasion in DCIS are age less than 55 years, tumor lesion size more than 4.0 cm, DCIS grade G3, and tumor palpability. Adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen significantly reduces the 10-year risk of invasive recurrence by 51%, the risk of contralateral BC by 50% and the risk of death by 40%, but only for hormone-positive DCIS. HER2 overexpression is found in DCIS significantly often (up to 40% of cases) than in invasive BC, HER2+ status correlates with DCIS high grade G3, the presence of comedonecrosis and with increased risk of relapse (both non-invasive and invasive) but is not a reason for anti-HER2 therapy. DCIS low risk and DCIS high risk have not only different morphological characteristics, but also different models of biological behavior, which must be considered in the different choice of treatment tactics.

About the authors

Irina V. Kolyadina

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Author for correspondence.
Email: irinakolyadina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1124-6802

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Anastasia S. Butrimova

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Email: butrimov2013@yandex.ru

Resident

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Irina V. Poddubnaya

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: ivprectorat@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0995-1801

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vlada V. Kоmetova

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Email: vladakometova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9666-6875

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Valery V. Rodionov

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Email: dr.valery.rodionov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0096-7126

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Salvatorelli L, Puzzo L, Vecchio GM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: an update with emphasis on radiological and morphological features as predictive prognostic factors. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(3):609. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030609
  2. Levinsohn E, Altman M, Chagpar AB. Controversies regarding the diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am Surg. 2018;84:1-6.
  3. Ward WH, DeMora L, Handorf E, et al. Preoperative delays in the treatment of DCIS and the associated incidence of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(2):386-96. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07844-4
  4. Cserni G, Sejben A. Grading Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast – what’s wrong with it? Pathol Oncol Res. 2020;26:665-71. doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00760-8
  5. Алиева Г.С., Корженкова Г.П., Колядина И.В. Анализ ключевых рентгенологических характеристик раннего инвазивного рака молочной железы стадий T1а–bN₀M₀ и DCIS. Онкол. журн.: лучевая диагностика, лучевая терапия. 2021;4(1):9-19 [Alieva GS, Korzhenkova GP, Koliadina IV. Analiz kliuchevykh rentgenologicheskikh kharakteristik rannego invazivnogo raka molochnoi zhelezy stadii T1а–bN₀M₀ i DCIS. Onkol. zhurn.: luchevaia diagnostika, luchevaia terapiia. 2021;4(1):9-19 (in Russian)].
  6. Колядина И.В., Поддубная И.В., Комов Д.В. Скрининг рака молочной железы: мировой опыт и перспективы. Рос. онкол. журн. 2015;20(1):42-6 [Koliadina IV, Poddubnaia IV, Komov DV. Skrining raka molochnoi zhelezy: mirovoi opyt i perspektivy. Ros. onkol. zhurn. 2015;20(1):42-6 (in Russian)].
  7. Punglia R, Bifolck K, Golshan M, et al. Epidemiology, biology, treatment, and prevention of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018;2(4):pky063. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky063
  8. Levinsohn E, Altman M, Chagpar AB. Controversies regarding the diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am Surg. 2018;84:1-6.
  9. Bleicher RJ. Ductal carcinoma in situ. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93:393-410. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.12.001
  10. Bernardi D, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, et al. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): A population-based prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1105-13. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2
  11. Cha H, Chang Y, Lee E, et al. Ultrasonographic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlations with pathologic features and biological markers. Ultrasonography. 2018;37:307-14. doi: 10.14366/usg.17039
  12. Londero V, Zuiani C, Linda A, et al. High-risk breast lesions at imaging- guided needle biopsy: Usefulness of MRI fur treatment decision. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:W240-50. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7869
  13. Рак молочной железы. Практическое руководство для врачей. Под ред. Г.А. Франка, Л.Э. Завалишиной, К.М. Пожарисского. М., 2014 [Mammary cancer. A practical guide for doctors. Ed. GA Frank, LE Zavalishina, KM Pozharissky. Moscow, 2014 (in Russian)].
  14. Sahai E, Astsaturov I, Werb Z. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:174-86.
  15. Lee JH,·Kim HM,·Koo JS. Differential expression of cancer-associated fibroblast-related proteins in ductal carcinoma in situ according to molecular subtype and stromal histology. Pathobiology. 2018;85(5-6):311-21. doi: 10.1159/000492392
  16. Constantinou С, Fentiman I. Ductal carcinoma in situ treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Cancer Therapy. 2013;4:1203-16. doi: 10.4236/jct.2013.47140
  17. Sagara Y, Mallory M, Stephanie Wong S, et al. Survival benefit of breast surgery for low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(8):739-45. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0876
  18. Grimm LJ, Shelley Hwang E. Active surveillance for DCIS: the importance of selection criteria and monitoring. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(13):4134-36.
  19. A Trial Comparing Surgery with Active Monitoring for Low Risk DCIS (LORIS). Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/find-a-clinical-trial/a-trial-comparing-surgery-with-active-monitoring-for-low-risk-dcis-loris. Accessed: 06.08.2018.
  20. Management of Low-Risk DCIS (LORD). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02492607. Accessed: 06.08.2018.
  21. Comparison of Operative to Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial for Low Risk DCIS (COMET). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02926911. Accessed: 06.08.2018.
  22. Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Clinical Oncology Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23(12):3801-10.
  23. Жукова Л.Г., Андреева Ю.Ю., Завалишина Л.Э., и др. Рак молочной железы. Современная Онкология. 2021;23(1):5-40 [Zhukova LG, Andreeva YuYu, Zavalishina LE, et al. Breast cancer. Modern Oncology. 2021; 23 (1): 5-40 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.26442/18151434.2021.1.200823
  24. Marinovich L. The Association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(12):3811-21.
  25. Donker M, Litiere S, Werutsky G, et al. Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4054.
  26. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG); C Correa, P McGale, et al. Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):162-77. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq039
  27. Silverstein M, Lagios M. Choosing treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: fine tuning the University of Southern California/Van Nuys Prognostic Index. JNCI Monographs. 2010; 41:193-6. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq040
  28. Williams KE, Barnes NLP, Cramer A, et al. Molecular phenotypes of DCIS predict overall and invasive recurrence. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(5):1019-25.
  29. Allred D, Stewart Anderson S, Paik S, et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen reduces subsequent breast cancer in women with estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ: a study based on NSABP protocol B-24. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(12):1268-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.0141

Copyright (c) 2021 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies