Treatment of children with medulloblastoma without metastatic involvement in the age group older than 3 years: international experience and results of intercenter trial

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. During the past 20 years, some large international studies have been conducted that evaluated the effectiveness of treatment programs for children with medulloblastoma. At the same time, in the standard risk group, fairly high rates of 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were achieved, which amounted to 85% and 80%, respectively. At the present time some risk-adaptive therapeutic programs are developed according to molecular-biological features of tumor cells and possibility of chemotherapy and craniospinal radiation (CSI) therapy dose reduction.

Materials and methods. From 2008 to 2018 fifty one pediatric patients with primary diagnosed medulloblastoma in the age group 3–18 years were included in trial, 38 in standard risk group, 13 in high risk group (without metastatic disease). Treatment program consisted of surgical removal of the primary tumor site with subsequent chemotherapy (with high-dose cyclophosphamide or thiophosphamide) and radiation therapy (with CSI of 23.4 Gy or 36 Gy, depending on the risk group). In order to detect morphological and molecular biological distinctive features of tumor cells, the following criteria were evaluated: histological variant, molecular subgroup, methyltransferase status by DNMT and MGMT proteins expression, presence of C-MYC/N-MYC gene amplification, Iso17q and TP53 gene mutation.

Results. As a result of this study, sufficiently high rates of overall survival and progression/relapse-free survival (PRFS) were achieved in standard and high-risk groups patients, which amounted to 76.0±8.8% and 83.3±10.8% with median follow-up 62.9±6.2 months and 52.2±7.8 months, respectively. There was revealed patients group in the age 3–7 years with 100% PRFS and median follow-up 66.9±8.9 months. At the same time, morphological and molecular biological factors of an unfavorable outcome of the disease were absent in the tumor samples (large cell – anaplastic histology, C-MYC/N-MYC gene amplification, Iso17q and TP53 gene mutation). We have also achieved 100% PRFS in patients with desmoplastic tumor histology and in patients, who were treated with thiphosphamide-based chemotherapy regimen. Molecular-biological characteristics analysis of tumor cells showed a negative effect on PRFS of DNMT-positive status (Score >4, by 3 markers) and presence of N-MYC gene amplification (SHH molecular subgroup).

Conclusion. There was identified a group of patients aged 3 to 7 years, for whom the possibility for reducing of CSR dose down to 18 Gy opens. Understanding of tumor cells methyltransferase status creates the prerequisites for using of epigenetic demethylating therapy. It is necessary more observations to assess the effect of the chemotherapy regimen with high-dose thiophosphamide on the PRFS.

About the authors

Andrei S. Levashov

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Author for correspondence.
Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5081-3964

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Svetlana R. Zagidullina

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6606-3106

pediatric oncologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna M. Stroganova

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7297-5240

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitrii A. Khochenkov

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5694-3492

Cand. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Marina V. Ryzhova

Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7206-6365

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Sergei K. Gorelyshev

Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Shavkat U. Kadirov

Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5879-1333

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Stepan S. Babelyan

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8072-9173

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vasilii A. Grigorenko

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2391-4142

radiologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitrii A. Sidel’nikov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5950-4399

6th year Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Natalia N. Subbotina

The group of companies MEDSI

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3997-617X

Cand. Sci. (Med.) Clinical Hospital №2

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vidmante V. Daylidite

Ilyinskaya Hospital

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4682-5433

pediatric oncologist, pediatrician

Russian Federation, Krasnogorsk

Georgii L. Mentkevich

NeuroVita Clinic

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0879-0791

Prof.

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Jordan X. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2009–2013. Neuro-Oncology 2016; 18: 1–75. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now207
  2. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016; 131: 803–20. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
  3. Gajjar AJ, Robinson GW. Medulloblastoma – translating discoveries from the bench to the bedside. Focus on Paediatric Cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11 (12): 714–23. DOI: 10.1038/ nrclinonc.2014.181
  4. Cavalli FMG, Remke M, Rampasek L. Intertumoral Heterogeneity within Medulloblastoma Subgroups. Cancer Cell 2017; 31 (6): 737–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.005
  5. Schwable EC, Lindsey JC, Nakjang S. Novel molecular subgroups for clinical classification and outcome prediction in childhood medulloblastoma: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18 (7): 958–71. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30243-7
  6. Waszak SM, Northcott PA, Buchalter I. Spectrum and prevalence of genetic predisposition in medulloblastoma: a retrospective genetic study and prospective validation in a clinical trial cohort. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19 (6): 785–98. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18) 30242-0
  7. Lafay Cousin L, Smith A, Chi SN. Clinical, pathological and molecular characterization of infant medulloblastomas treated with sequential high-dose chemotherapy. Ped Blood Cancer 2016; 63(9): 1527–34. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26042
  8. Von Bueren AO, von Hoff K, Pietsch T. Treatment of young children with localized medulloblastoma by chemotherapy alone: Results of the prospective, multicenter trial HIT 2000 confirming the prognostic impact of histology. Neuro-Oncology 2011; 13 (6): 669–79. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nor025
  9. Michalski JM, Janss A, Vesina G. Results of COG ACNS0331: A Phase III Trial of Involved-Field Radiotherapy (IFRT) and Low Dose Craniospinal Irradiation (LD-CSI) with Chemotherapy in Average-Risk Medulloblastoma: A Report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol 2016; 96 (5): 937–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp. 2016.09.046
  10. Gajjar A, Chintagumpala M, Ashley D. Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7 (10): 813–20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70867-1
  11. Bueren AO, Kortmann RD, von Hoff K. Treatment of children and adolescents with metastatic medulloblastoma and prognostic relevance of clinical and biologic parameters. J Clinl Oncol 2016; 34: 4151–60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.2428
  12. Packer J, Gajjar A, Vezina G. Phase III Study of craniospinal radiation therapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma. Journal of clinical oncology 2006; 24 (25): 4202–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4980
  13. Lannering B, Rutkowski S, Doz F. Hyperfractionated versus conventional radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy in standart-risk medulloblastoma: results from the randomized multicenter HIT-SIOP PNET 4 trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (26): 3187–93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.8719
  14. Wetmore C, Herington D, Lin T. Reirradiation of recurrent medulloblastoma: does clinical benefit outweigh risk for toxicity? Cancer 2014; 120 (23): 3731–7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28907
  15. Sabel M, Fleischhack G, Tippelt S. Relapse patterns and outcome after relapse in standard risk medulloblastoma: a report from the HIT-SIOP-PNET4 study. J Neuro-Oncol 2016; 129 (3): 515–24. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2202-1
  16. Shih DJ, Northcott PA, Remke M. Cytogenetic prognostification within medulloblastoma subgroups. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32 (9): 886–96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9539
  17. Clifford SC, Lannering B, Schwalbe EC. Biomarker-driven stratification of disease-risk in non-metastatic medulloblastoma: Results from the multi-center HIT-SIOPPNET4 clinical trial. Oncotarget 2015; 6 (36): 38827–39. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5149
  18. Goschzik T, Schwalbe EC, Hicks D. Prognostic effect of whole chromosomal aberration signatures in standard-risk, non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma: a retrospective, molecular analysis of the HIT-SIOP PNET 4 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19(12): 1602–16. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30532-1
  19. Pocza T, Krenacs T, Turanyi E. High expression of DNA methyltransferases in primary human medulloblastoma. Folia Neuropathol 2016; 54 (2): 105–3. doi: 10.5114/fn.2016.60365
  20. Zhukova N, Ramaswamy V, Remke M. Subgroup-Specific Prognostic Implications of TP53 Mutation in Medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31 (23): 2927–35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5052

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Overall survival and progression/relapse-free survival (PFS) rates in children with medulloblastoma (in the standard-risk group).

Download (108KB)
3. Fig. 2. PFS rate in children with medulloblastoma, depending on age and gender (in the standard-risk group).

Download (134KB)
4. Fig. 3. PFS rate in children with medulloblastoma, depending on the primary tumor location (in the standard- risk group).

Download (128KB)
5. Fig. 4. PFS rate in children with medulloblastoma, depending on the regimen of high-dose chemotherapy and DT (in the standard-risk group).

Download (129KB)
6. Fig. 5. PFS rate in children with medulloblastoma depending on DNMT (DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b) and MGMT status of tumor cells (in the standard-risk group).

Download (147KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies