Tumor biology or adjuvant systemic therapy: what determines the risk of recurrence in breast cancer stage I?


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim: to study the prognostic value of clinical and morphological factors for the risk of recurrences in breast cancer stage I.Materials and methods: In study included 1341 women with breast cancer stage I (T1a-b-cN0M0), treated in the RCRC and RMAPE 1985-2012. We analyzed the clinical factors (age, volume of surgery, radiotherapy, type of adjuvant systemic therapy) and morphological factors (status of estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER2-status, proliferation activity index Ki-67, biological subtype, presence of lymph vascular invasion and intraductal component and the tumor size T1a-b-c). We assessed the risk of recurrence (median follow up - 96 months), the rate of relapse and disease-free survival in different subgroups using univariate and multivariate COX-regression analysis. Results: In univariate COX-regression analysis we found the prognostic value for the risk of recurrences of such morphological factors: grade of tumor ( p =0,034), histological type ( p =0,025), tumor size T1a-b-c ( p =0,004), presence of lymph vascular invasion ( p =0,03) and biological subtype of breast cancer ( p =0,002). The most favorable is the luminal A subtype with minimal rate of distant relapses (1,6%), the maximum time to progression (median - 48 months) and the best rate of the 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (97,2 and 93,8% respectively). The most important clinical factors were age ( p =0,001), the volume of surgery ( p =0,032), the using of «boost» after breast conservingtherapy ( p =0,007), and presence of adjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or both therapy in accordance with the biological subtype, p <0,0001). In multivariate regression analysis, only two factors were significant for predicting the risk of recurrence of breast cancer stage I ( p <0,05): biological subtype and adjuvant systemic treatment. Compared with luminal A subtype the risk of relapse is significant higher in luminal B subtypes (HER2-negative: HR 1,393; HER2-positive: HR 1,321), in triple negative subtype - HR 2,297 and, especially, in hormone negative HER2-positive breast cancer - HR 6,001, p =0,04. Adjuvant systemic therapy reduce the risk of recurrence until 74% in breast cancer stage I (HR 0,276; p <0,0001).Conclusion: The tumor biology and adjuvant systemic therapy determines prognosis in breast cancer stage I.

About the authors

I V Kolyadina

Department of Oncology, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia (125993, Barricadnaya st. 2/1, Moscow, Russia); 2N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center (RCRC) (115478, Kashirskoe shosse, 24, Moscow, Russia)

Email: irinakolyadina@yandex.ru
канд. мед. наук, врач-онколог, доц. каф. онкологии

I V Poddubnaya

Department of Oncology, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia (125993, Barricadnaya st. 2/1, Moscow, Russia); 2N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center (RCRC) (115478, Kashirskoe shosse, 24, Moscow, Russia)

O P Trofimova

Department of Oncology, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia (125993, Barricadnaya st. 2/1, Moscow, Russia); 2N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center (RCRC) (115478, Kashirskoe shosse, 24, Moscow, Russia)

G A Frank

Department of Oncology, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia (125993, Barricadnaya st. 2/1, Moscow, Russia)

A I Karseladze

N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center (RCRC) (115478, Kashirskoe shosse, 24, Moscow, Russia)

D V Komov

N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center (RCRC) (115478, Kashirskoe shosse, 24, Moscow, Russia)

References

  1. Minicozzi P, Bella F, Toss A et al. Relative and disease - free survival for breast cancer in relation to subtype: a population - based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2013; 139 (9): 1569-77.
  2. Cadoo K.A, Fornier M.N, Morris P.G. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: current concepts and implications for recurrence patterns. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 57 (4): 312-21.
  3. Parise C.A, Bauer K.R, Brown M.M, Caggiano V. Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California (1999-2004). Breast J 2009; 15 (6): 593-602.
  4. Pracella D, Bonin S, Barbazza R et al. Are breast cancer molecular classes predictive of survival in patients with long follow - up? Dis Markers 2013; 35 (6): 595-605.
  5. Wang Y, Yin Q, Yu Q et al. A retrospective study of breast cancer subtypes: the risk of relapse and the relations with treatments. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 130 (2): 489-98.
  6. García-Fernández A, Chabrera C, García-Font M et al. Differential survival and recurrence patterns of patients operated for breast cancer according to the new immunohistochemical classification: analytical survey from 1997 to 2012. Tumour Biol 2013; 34 (4): 2349-55.
  7. García-Fernández A, Chabrera C, García-Font M et al. Mortality and recurrence patterns of breast cancer patients diagnosed under a screening programme vs. comparable non - screened breast cancer patients from the same population: analytical survey from 2002 to 2012. Tumour Biol 2013; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24114015
  8. Hanrahan E.O, Valero V, Gonzalez-Angulo A.M, Hortobagyi G.N. Prognosis and management of patients with node - negative invasive breast carcinoma that is 1 cm or smaller in size (stage I; T1a,bN0M0): a review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (13): 2113-22.

Copyright (c) 2014 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies