Vulvar cancer: brain metastases. Clinical observation
- 作者: Ognerubov N.A.1,2, Antipova T.S.3, Kamneva N.A.2
-
隶属关系:
- Derzhavin Tambov State University
- Tambov Regional Oncological Clinical Dispensary
- PET-Technology
- 期: 卷 22, 编号 4 (2020)
- 页面: 130-133
- 栏目: CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1815-1434/article/view/61193
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2020.4.200299
- ID: 61193
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Introduction. Brain metastases can occur in almost all gynecological malignancies and, despite modern therapeutic options, have a poor prognosis. Brain metastases from vulvar cancer are considered to be rare. In the literature, the reports on these cases have identity character.
The aim is to show clinical observation of the patient with vulvar cancer with brain metastases.
Results. Patient S., 60 years old, with stage I р T1N0M0 vulvar cancer underwent vulvectomy in January 2018. During the histological study – in the subepithelial layers were the areas of kraurosis with the growth of squamous cell keratinous carcinoma. Taking into account the prevalence of the tumor process, adjuvant treatment was not carried out. Two years later, in January 2020, there were focal symptoms in form of weakness in the left upper and lower limbs, an unsteady gait, a generalized weakness. During magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain in the occipital lobe paraventricular with intensive perifocal edema to the right was determined cystic-solid formation with rough edges which size was 29×33×65 mm without clinically significant mass-effect. The middle structures were not displaced. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed to detect the prevalence of the tumor process. Data on the presence of the active specific process at the time of study were not received. Taking into account the absence of other indicators of generalization process, whole brain radiation therapy (single fraction dose of 3 Gy, total radiation dose of 30 Gy) was carried out, followed by the application of Temodal. The patient was examined in 6 months. There were no signs of progression.
Conclusion. Brain metastases from vulvar cancer are considered to be rare. This clinical case is interesting because brain metastases have been the only manifestation of the progression of the tumor process in the absence of regional lymph nodes damage. The main diagnostic method is MRI of the brain. The use of PET/CT helps to detect the prevalence of the tumor process. The metastases have been detected after 36 months from the date of the initial diagnosis of the cancer. Radiation therapy is a method of choice of brain metastases treatment.
作者简介
Nikolai Ognerubov
Derzhavin Tambov State University; Tambov Regional Oncological Clinical Dispensary
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ognerubov_n.a@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4045-1247
SPIN 代码: 3576-3592
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
俄罗斯联邦, TambovTatyana Antipova
PET-Technology
Email: antipovats@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4165-8397
doctor, PET-Technology
俄罗斯联邦, TambovNatalya Kamneva
Tambov Regional Oncological Clinical Dispensary
Email: antipovats@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3251-0315
Head Radiotherapy Department
俄罗斯联邦, Tambov参考
- Schuurman MS et al. Trends in incidence and survival of Dutch women with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49 (18): 3872–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.003
- Polat Dursun, Ali Ayhan N, Cagla Tarhan et al. Cerebellar metastasis in squamous cell vulvar carcinoma. Gynecol Obstet 2009; 279: 69–71. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0635-2
- Esra Çabuk Cömert, Nefise Çagla Tarhan, Polat Dursun. Outcomes in 12 gynecologic cancer patients with brain metastasis: A single center’s experience. Turkish J Med Sci 2012. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265185652
- Prieske K, Haeringer N, Grimma D et al. Patterns of distant metastases in vulvar cancer. Gyn Oncol 2016; 142: 427–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.009
- Novak’s textbook of gynecology. 13th edn. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Pennsylvania, 2002; pp. 1321–52.
- Coulter J, Gleeson N. Local and regional recurrence of vulval cancer: management dilemmas. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 17 (4): 663–81. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6934(03)00050-6
- Vázquez JP, Cobo SL, Antón FM et al. Brain metastasis and carcinomatous meningitis from vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2007; 28 (2): 152–4. PMID: 17479684
- Hatiboglu MA, Cosar M, Iplikcioglu AC, Ozcan D. Brain metastasis from an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the Bartholin gland. Case Rep J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (3): 543–6.
- Huang GS, Juretzka M, Ciaravino G et al. Liposomal doxorubicin for treatment of metastatic chemorefractory vulvar adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 87 (3): 313–8. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6830
- Ramanah R, Allam-Ndoul E, Baeza C, Riethmuller D. Brain and lung metastasis of Bartholin’s gland adenoid cystic carcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2013; 7: 208. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-208
- Witteveen PO, van der Velden J, Vergote I et al. Phase II study on paclitaxel in patients with recurrent,metastatic or locally advanced vulvar cancer not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy: a study of the EORTC-GCG (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer – Gynaecological cancer group). Ann Oncol 2009; 20: 1511–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp043
- Maggino T, Landoni F, Sartori E et al. Patterns of recurrence in patientswith squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Amulticenter CTF study. Cancer 2000; 89: 116–22. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000701)89:1<116::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-4
- Jaeger A, Biermann M, Prieske K et al. Cerebral metastasis in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: case report and review of the literature. Arch Gyn Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05403-6
- Mahner S, Jueckstock J, Hilpert F et al., investigators AG-C, Adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive vulvar cancer: the AGO-CaRE-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107.
- Tangjitgamol S, Levenback CF, Beller U, Kavanagh JJ. Role of surgical resection for lung, liver, and central nervous system metastases in patients with gynecological cancer: a literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004; 14: 399–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1048-891x.2004.14326.x
补充文件
