Lenvatinib as the key component of first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Throughout the last 10 years, liver cancer mortality rate in the Russian Federation consistently exceeded the morbidity rate, which is related to the complexity of early diagnostics, absence of effective screening and oncological alertness of allied-profession doctors. In the situation when late disease intelligence does not frequently allow radical treatment, palliative methods remain the only option of survivability enhancement and improving the patients’ quality of life. Lenvatinib was approved as the first-line drug in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma based on the data of the REFLECT trial, in which the drug demonstrated achieving the patients’ overall survival (OS) comparable to the activity of sorafenib (13.6 months for lenvatinib vs 12.3 months for sorafenib; hazard ratio – HR 0.92; 95% confidence interval – CI 0.79–1.06). At the same time, significant inferiority of lenvatinib was observed for secondary endpoints: progression-free survival – PFS (7.4 months for lenvatinib vs 3.7 months for sorafenib; HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57–0.77; р<0.0001), time to progression (8.9 months for lenvatinib vs 3.7 months for sorafenib; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.53–0.73; р<0.0001) and objective response rate – ORR (24.1% for lenvatinib vs 9.2% for sorafenib). The further analysis of the results of the REFLECT study revealed the additional factors impacting patients’ survival, such as the level of a-fetoprotein (AFP) before treatment, treatment ORR, performance of subsequent antitumor therapy and procedures after completion of the target first-line therapy. In patients responding to lenvatinib in the first line and further receiving any second-line therapy, the mOS was 25.7 months as compared with the median overall survival (mOS) of 22.3 months in patients responding to sorafenib and receiving further second-line therapy. Additionally, in “responders” switching from lenvatinib to sorafenib, the mOS was 26.2 months. In the recently published comparative study of lenvatinib and transarterial chemoembolization on the BCLC B stage, inferiority of lenvatinib was demonstrated in terms of OS, PFS and ORR in certain patient categories. Considering the data obtained in the REFLECT population, where in patients achieving the RR to the first-line treatment with lenvatinib and further receiving the local antitumor procedures the mOS increased to 27.2 months (95% CI 20.7–29.8), prescribing target and locoregional therapy in certain cases in this very sequence is possible. The recently published data about administration of lenvatinib outside of the inclusion criteria for the REFLECT trial, have proved the efficacy and safety of this drug administration in real clinical practice, thus significantly expanding our understanding of the key role of lenvatinib in the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

About the authors

L. V. Bolotina

Gertsen Moscow Research and Scientific Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology

Author for correspondence.
Email: lbolotina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4879-2687

D. Sci. (Med.), Gertsen Moscow Research and Scientific Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2018 году. Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М., 2019.
  2. [The state of cancer care for the population of Russia in 2018. Ed. A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, G.V. Petrova. Moscow, 2019 (in Russian).]
  3. Bray F et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov; 68 (6): 394–424.
  4. Бредер В.В. и др. Гепатоцеллюлярный рак в Российской Федерации. Мед. совет. 2016; 10.
  5. [Breder V.V. et al. Gepatotselliuliarnyi rak v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Med. sovet. 2016; 10 (in Russian).]
  6. Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018; 391 (10126): 1163–73.
  7. Tohyama O, Matsui J, Kodama K et al. Antitumor activity of lenvatinib (e7080): an angiogenesis inhibitor that targets multiple receptor tyrosine kinases in preclinical human thyroid cancer models. J Thyroid Res 2014; 2014: 638747.
  8. Yamamoto Y, Matsui J, Matsushima T et al. Lenvatinib, an angiogenesis inhibitor targeting VEGFR/FGFR, shows broad antitumor activity in human tumor xenograft models associated with microvessel density and pericyte coverage. Vasc Cell 2014; 6 (1): 18.
  9. Matsui J, Yamamoto Y, Funahashi Y et al. E7080, a novel inhibitor that targets multiple kinases, has potent antitumor activities against stem cell factor producing human small cell lung cancer H146, based on angiogenesis inhibition. Int J Cancer 2008; 122 (3): 664–71.
  10. Matsui J, Funahashi Y, Uenaka T et al. Multi-kinase inhibitor E7080 suppresses lymph node and lung metastases of human mammary breast tumor MDAMB-231 via inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor (VEGF-R) 2 and VEGF-R3 kinase. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14 (17): 5459–65.
  11. Alsina A, Masatoshi Kudo M, Vogel A. Effects of Subsequent Systemic Anticancer Medication Following First Line Lenvatinib: A Post Hoc Responder Analysis from the Phase 3 REFLECT Study in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Cancer 2020; 9: 93–104.
  12. Alsina A, Kudo M, Vogel A et al. Subsequent anticancer procedures following first-line lenvatinib (LEN): a post hoc analysis from the phase 3 REFLECT study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). ASCO-GI; January 23-25, 2020; San Francisco, CA. Original Research, Poster.
  13. Vogel A, Frenette C, Sung M. Baseline liver function and outcomes in the phase III REFLECT study in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2020; 38 (4): 524.
  14. Ogasawara S, Chiba T, Ooka Y et al. Liver function assessment according to the Albumin–Bilirubin (ALBI) grade in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Investigational New Drugs 2015; 33: 1257–62.
  15. Johnson PJ et al. An assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A new evidence-based approach – The ALBI grade. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33 (6): 550–8.
  16. Briggs A, Daniele B, Dick K et al. Covariate-adjusted analysis of the Phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2020; 122: 1754–9.
  17. Mazzaferro V, Sposito C, Zhou J et al. Metroticket 2.0 model for analysis of competing risks of death after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 128–39.
  18. Broadhurst P, Toyoda H, Kumada T et al. Prognostic impact of serum alpha-fetoprotein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: an international collaborative study. J Hepatol 2017; 66: S620–S621.
  19. Bruix J, Cheng AL, Meinhardt G et al. Prognostic factors and predictors of sorafenib benefit in patients with hepato-cellular carcinoma: analysis of two phase III studies. J Hepatol 2017; 67: 999–1008.
  20. Sho T, Suda G, Ogawa K et al. Lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who do not meet the REFLECT trial eligibility criteria. Hepatol Res 2020.
  21. Kudo M, Ueshima K, Chan S et al. Lenvatinib as an Initial Treatment in Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Up-To-Seven Criteria and Child-Pugh A Liver Function: A Proof-Of-Concept Study. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 31; 11 (8):1 084. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081084. PMID: 31370183; PMCID: PMC6721438.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) for patients from REFLECT who received subsequent anticancer medication by first-line treatment arm [9]. Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier estimate of OS for lenvatinib responders who subsequently received poststudy sorafenib treatment [9].

Download (763KB)
3. Fig. 3. Progression-free survival (PFS) in both groups with Child–Pugh A liver function after propencity score matching. PFS in the lenvatinib-treated group was significantly better than that in the TACE-treated group (16.0 months vs 3.0 months; HR 0.19; p<0.001) [19]. Fig. 4. OS in both groups after propencity score matching. OS in the lenvatinib-treated group was significantly better than that in the TACE-treated group (37.9 months vs 21.3 months; HR 0.48; p<0.01) [19]. Fig. 5. Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score over time in lenvatinib and TACE treated groups. ALBI score was significantly worsened at the end of treatment (-2.09) as compared with that at the baseline (-2.66) in the TACE treated group (p<0.01). In contrast, ALBI score was maintained at the baseline (-2.61) and at the end of treatment (-2.61) in the lenvatinib treated group [19].

Download (1MB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies