Experience of like-SJMB03 protocolin treatment of children with medulloblastomain the age group over 3 years:results of an intercenter pilot study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. The experience of using the like-SJMB03 therapeutic program is presented. The aim of this study was to assess the potential possibility of reducing the dose of craniospinal and local radiation therapy in the standard and high-risk group patients, and to identify clinical, therapeutic, morphological and molecular-biological factors that determine disease prognosis.

Materials and methods. From 2008 till 2016 years 48 patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma were included in the study. In most cases (85%), localization of the primary tumor site was presented by a lesion of the cerebellar vermis with spread into the 4-th ventricle cavity. Gross total or near gross total resection of the primary tumor focus (R0 status) was achieved in 32 (66.7%) cases. The presence of a metastatic disease was established in 15 (31.2%) patients. Molecular biological characteristics of tumor samples were assessed using fluorescent hybridization in situ (FISH), Sanger PCR sequencing, and Illumina Infinium Human Methylation 450/850K BeadChip. Risk group stratification was according to SJMB03 (standard risk group was defined as: R0, M0 status; high-risk group: R1M0 or R0/1M+). A distinctive feature of this protocol was a reduction of the craniospinal irradiation dose down to 36 Gy for patients with M2/M3 status (without additional irradiation of metastatic foci) and the local irradiation dose down to 54 Gy (regardless of R status).

Results. In the standard risk group (R0M0), 5-year and 10-year EFS were 84.0±7.3% and 67.2±9.6%, 5-year and 10-year OS were 92.0±5.4% and 76.4±9.9%, in the high-risk group (R1M0): 5-year and 10-year EFS – 62.5±17.1% and 62.5±17.1%, 5-year and 10-year OS – 75.0±15.3% and 62.5±17.1%, in the high-risk group (R0/1M+): 5-year and 10-year EFS – 33.3±12.2% and 33.3±12.2%, 5-year and 10-year OS – 60.0±12.6% and 33.3±12.2%. Structure of events was presented by 15 disease recurrences (7 localized – 2 early, 5 late; 8 disseminated – 3 early, 5 late), 2 cases of disease progression, 2 cases of secondary tumors (in the first – osteosarcoma, in the second – glioblastoma) and 2 episodes of fatal septic complications. Most of the events were found in patients with a Group 4 tumor. Two peaks of the events were established in standard risk group (the first peak was within 2 years after the end of treatment program, mainly in the age group of 8 years and older, the second peak was within 3 years after the fifth year of observation, predominantly in the group from 3 to 7 years). CSI dose reduction down to 36 Gy for patients with M2/M3 status (without additional irradiation of metastatic foci) in the high-risk group led to a dramatic decrease of 5-year EFS. There was a trend towards a decrease in 5-year EFS and OS in patients aged 8 years and older, as well as in the presence of the C-MYC, N-MYC genes amplification, isochromosome 17q in tumor cells.

Conclusion. Despite the accumulated experience, it is necessary to continue studying the relationship between age groups and the molecular biology of tumor cells in medulloblastoma.

About the authors

Andrey S. Levashov

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5081-3964

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Svetlana R. Zagidullina

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6606-3106

Pediatric Oncologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Timur T. Valiev

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1469-2365

D. Sci. (Med.), Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna M. Stroganova

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7297-5240

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitry A. Khochenkov

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5694-3492

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vasiliy A. Grigorenko

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2391-4142

Radiologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena V. Mikhaylova

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7630-7496

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elizaveta V. Tyurina

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4019-5247

Pediatric Oncologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Marina V. Ryzhova

Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7206-6365

D. Sci. (Med.), Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Serhii K. Horielyshev

Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1318-7823

D. Sci. (Med.), Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Shavkat U. Kadirov

Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery

Author for correspondence.
Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5879-1333

Cand. Sci. (Med.), neurosurgeon

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vladimir G. Polyakov

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: andreyslevashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8096-0874

Prof., Acad. RAS, Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Левашов А.С., Загидуллина С.Р., Валиев Т.Т. Международный опыт применения протоколов SJMB в лечении детей с медуллобластомой в возрастной группе старше 3 лет (обзор литературы). Современная Онкология. 2023;25(3):385-90 [Levashov AS, Zagidullina SR, Valiev TT, et al. International experience by using of the SJMB protocols in treatment of children with medulloblastoma in the age group over 3 years (literature review). Journal of Modern Oncology. 2023;25(3):385-90 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.26442/18151434.2023.3.202437
  2. Gajjar A, Chintagumpala M, Ashley D. Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(10):813-20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70867-1
  3. Gajjar A, Robinson GW, Smith KS. Outcomes by clinical and molecular features in children with medulloblastoma treated with risk – adapted therapy: results of in International phase III trial (SJMB03). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(7):822-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01372
  4. Kumar R, Smith KS, Deng M. Clinical outcomes and patient-matched molecular composition of relapsed medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(7):807-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01359
  5. Stewart CF, Lacono LC, Chintagumpala M. Results of a phase II upfront window of pharmacokinetically guided topotecan in high-Risk medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(16):3357-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.103
  6. Bueren AO, Kortmann RD, Hoff K. Treatment of children and adolescents with metastatic medulloblastoma and prognostic relevance of clinical and biologic parameters. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4151-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.2428
  7. Clifford SC, Lannering B, Schwalbe EC. Biomarker-driven stratification of disease-risk in non-metastatic medulloblastoma: Results from the multi-center HIT-SIOP PNET4 clinical trial. Oncotarget. 2015;6(36):38827-39. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5149
  8. Dufour C, Foulon S, Geoffray A. Prognostic relevance of clinical and molecular risk factors in children with high risk medulloblastoma treated in the Phase II trial PNET HR+5. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(7):1163-72. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa301
  9. Fukuoka K, Kurihara J, Shofuda T. Subtyping of Group 3/4 medulloblastoma as a potential prognostic biomarker among patients treated with reduced dose of craniospinal irradiation: a Japanese Pediatric Molecular Neuro – Oncology Group study. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023;11:153. doi: 10.1186/s40478-023-01652-4
  10. Goddard J, Castle J, Southworth E. Molecular characterisation defines clinically – actionable heterogeneity within Group 4 medulloblastoma and improves disease risk – stratification. Acta Neoropathol. 2023;145(5):651. doi: 10.1007/s00401-023-02566-0
  11. Goschzik T, Mynarek M, Doerner E. Genetic alterations of TP53 and OTX2 indicate increased risk of relapse in WNT medulloblastoma. Acta Neuripathol. 2022;144(6):1143-56. doi: 10.1007/s00401-022-02505-5
  12. Kennedy C, Bull K, Chevignard M. Quality of survival and growth in children and young adults in the PNET4 European controlled trial of hyperfractionated versus conventional radiation therapy for standard-risk medulloblastoma. Int Journal of Radiat Oncol, Biol, Phys. 2014;88(2):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.046
  13. Lannering B, Rutkowski S, Doz F. Hyperfractionated versus conventional radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy in standard-risk medulloblastoma: results from the randomized multicenter HIT-SIOP PNET 4 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(26):3187-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.8719
  14. Leary SES, Packer RJ, Li Y. Efficacy of carboplatin and isotretinoin in children with high – risk medulloblastoma: a randomized clinical trial from the Children’s Oncology Group. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(9):1313-20. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2224
  15. Michalski JM, Janss AJ, Vezina LG. Results of COG ACNS0331: A Phase III Trial of involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) and low dose craniospinal irradiation (LD-CSI) with chemotherapy in average-risk medulloblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Int J Rad Oncol. 2016;96(5):937-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.09.046
  16. Mynarek M, Obrecht D, Sill M. Identification of low and very high – risk patients with non – WNT/non – SHH medulloblastoma by improved clinico – molecular stratification of the HIT2000 and I – HIT – MED cohorts. Acta Neuropathol. 2023;145(1):97-112. doi: 10.1007/s00401-022-02522-4
  17. Sursal T, Ronecker JS, Dicpinigaitis AJ. Molecular stratification of medulloblastoma: clinical outcomes and therapeutic interventions. Anticancer Res. 2022;42(5):2225-39. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15703
  18. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD. The 2007 WHO Classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114(2):97-109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4
  19. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803-20. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
  20. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231-51. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) ratesin the standard risk group.

Download (58KB)
3. Fig. 2. EFS and OS rates in the standard risk group depending on age.

Download (184KB)
4. Fig. 3. EFS and OS rates in the high-risk group with R1M0 status.

Download (62KB)
5. Fig. 4. EFS and OS rates in the high-risk group with R0/1M + status.

Download (142KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies