Efficacy of immunotherapy (Prolgolimab) and targeted therapy (Trametinib and Dabrafenib, Cobimetinib and Vemurafenib) in adult patients with metastatic or unresectable skin melanoma: matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To assess the comparative clinical efficacy of Prolgolimab monotherapy versus combination therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (Dabrafenib and Trametinib, Vemurafenib and Cobimetinb) in adult patients with metastatic or unresectable skin melanoma implementing a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).

Materials and methods. We conducted a systematic search for randomized clinical trials of Prolgolimab, combinations of Dabrafenib and Trametinib, Cobimetinib and Vemurafenib. Unanchored MAIC was applied due to the absence of common comparator between trials. We determined effect modifiers based on an expert survey. The population from Prolgolimab studies was weighted using defined effect modifiers, followed by the approximation of survival curves.

Results. Systematic literature search revealed 4 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria: MIRACULUM, coBRIM, combi-v and combi-d. To increase the power of prolgolimab comparison, data from the observational study FORA were included in evidence synthesis and combined with data from MIRACULUM. We selected M staging and the proportion of patients with elevated LDH levels as effect modifiers. No significant differences (all p>0.05) were established between Prolgolimab and combination therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors for both OS after 1 year and PFS outcomes after 2 years from initiation.

Discussion. Despite the inclusion of observational data and the limitations of adjusted indirect comparison method, the results of this analyses are consistent with both other comparisons of anti-PD1 inhibitors with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and with real world data. It is necessary to recompare targeted therapy and immunotherapy after five-year follow-up period due to peculiarities of time of onset of their effect with the presence of a primary “failure” with a gradual exit to a long “plateau” on anti-PD1 inhibitor’s therapy.

Conclusion. In these unanchored MAICs, Prolgolimab monotherapy showed comparable efficacy with combinations of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (Dabrafenib + Trametinib, Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib) in first line therapy of patients with metastatic or unresectable melanoma. This analysis may be relevant for clinical decision-making about the choice of the first line therapy for patients with BRAF mutation.

About the authors

Kirill V. Sapozhnikov

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: vdsokolova94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2476-7666

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Valeriia D. Sokolova

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Author for correspondence.
Email: vdsokolova94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7335-4852

Independent Expert

Russian Federation, Moscow

Natalia A. Sableva

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: vdsokolova94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5809-9221

Independent Expert

Russian Federation, Moscow

Daria G. Tolkacheva

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: vdsokolova94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6314-4218

Independent Expert

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2020 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2021 [Kaprin AD, Starinskii VV, Shakhzadova AO. Zlokachestvennyie novoobrazovaniia v Rossii v 2020 godu (zabolevaiemost' i smertnost'). Moscow: MNIOI im. PA Gertsena − filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2021 (in Russian)].
  2. Мазуренко Н.Н. Генетические особенности и маркеры меланомы кожи. Успехи молекулярной онкологии. 2014;1(2):26-35 [Mazurenko NN. Genetic alterations and markers of melanoma. Advances in Molecular Oncology. 2014;1(2):26-35 (in Russian)].
  3. Brady MS. Melanoma and other skin cancers. Cancer Manage. 2011;14:1-32.
  4. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2021 году. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2022 [Kaprin AD, Starinskii VV, Shakhzadova AO. Sostoianiie onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2021 godu. Moscow: MNIOI im. PA Gertsena − filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2022 (in Russian)].
  5. Литовкин А.В., Парфенов Ю.А., Парфенов С.А., Сапожников К.В. Формы оказания паллиативной помощи лицам старшей возрастной группы с онкологией. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2017;4 [Litovkin AV, Parfenov YuA, Parfenov SA, Sapozhnikov KV. Forms of palliative care for people of the older age group with oncology. Modern problems of science and education. 2017;4 (in Russian)].
  6. Ашоур А.З., Литовкин А.В., Белов В.Г., и др. Анализ медико-социальных потребностей онкологических пациентов старшей возрастной группы при оказании паллиативной помощи. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015;5 [Ashour AZ, Litovkin AV, Belov VG, et al. Analysis of the medical and social needs of older cancer patients in the provision of palliative care. Modern problems of science and education. 2015;5 (in Russian)].
  7. Франк Г.А., Завалишина Л.Э., Кекеева Т.В., и др. Первое Всероссийское молекулярно-эпидемиологическое исследование меланомы: результаты анализа мутаций в гене BRAF. Архив патологии. 2014;76(3):65-73 [Frank GA, Zavalishina LÉ, Kekeeva TV, et al. First Russian nationwide molecular epidemiological study for melanoma: results of BRAF mutation analysis. Arkhiv Patologii. 2014;76(3):65-73 (in Russian)].
  8. Клинические рекомендации «Меланома кожи и слизистых оболочек». 2020. Режим доступа: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/546_1. Ссылка активна на 12.10.2022 [Clinical guidelines "Melanoma of the skin and mucous membranes". Available athttps://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/546_1. Accessed: 12.10.2022 (in Russian)].
  9. Switzer B, Puzanov I, Skitzki JJ, et al. Managing Metastatic Melanoma in 2022: A Clinical Review. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022;18(5):335-51. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00686
  10. Tjulandin S, Demidov L, Moiseyenko V, et al. Novel PD-1 inhibitor prolgolimab: expanding non-resectable/metastatic melanoma therapy choice. Eur J Cancer. 2021;149:222-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.030
  11. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1345-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2185.
  12. Schachter J, Ribas A, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet. 2017;390(10105):1853-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31601-X
  13. Ascierto P, Dreno B, Larkin J, et al. 5-Year Outcomes with Cobimetinib Plus Vemurafenib in BRAFV600 Mutation–2 Positive Advanced Melanoma: Extended Follow-Up of the coBRIM Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(19):5225-35. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0809
  14. Davey MG, Miller N, McInerney NM. A Review of Epidemiology and Cancer Biology of Malignant Melanoma. Cureus. 2021;13(5):e15087. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15087
  15. Robert C, Ribas A, Hamid O, et al. Durable Complete Response After Discontinuation of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(17):1668-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6270
  16. Реброва О.Ю., Горяйнов С.В. Непрямые и смешанные сравнения медицинских технологий, сетевой мета-анализ. Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор. 2013;4(14):8-14 [Rebrova OYu, Goriainov SV. Nepriamyie i smeshannyie sravneniia meditsinskikh tekhnologii, setevoi meta-analiz. Meditsinskiie tekhnologii. Otsenka i vybor. 2013;4(14):8-14 (in Russian)].
  17. Phillippo D, Ades T, Dias S, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 18: methods for population-adjusted indirect comparisons in submissions to NICE. London, 2016.
  18. Методические рекомендации по проведению непрямых сравнений лекарственных препаратов. Утверждены приказом ФГБУ «ЦЭККМП» Минздрава России от 29 декабря 2017 года №181-од. Режим доступа: https://rosmedex.ru/pub. Ссылка активна на 12.10.2022 [Metodicheskie rekomendacii po provedeniyu nepryamyh sravnenij lekarstvennyh preparatov. Utverzhdeny prikazom FGBU "CEKKMP" Minzdrava Rossii ot 29 dekabrya 2017 goda №181-od. Available at: https://rosmedex.ru/pub. Accessed: 12.10.2022 (in Russian)].
  19. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
  20. Robert C, Karaszewska B, Schachter J, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):30-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412690
  21. Robert C, Grob JJ, Stroyakovskiy D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):626-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904059
  22. Орлова К.В., Федянин М.Ю., Симаненков К.Э., и др. Эффективность 1-й линии терапии пролголимабом у больных метастатической меланомой в реальной клинической практике: промежуточные результаты наблюдательного исследования FORA «FOrteca Real practice Assessment». Современная Онкология. 2022;24(4):413-25. doi: 10.26442/18151434.2022.4.202035 [Orlova KV, Fedyanin M, Simanenkov KE, et al. Real-world efficacy of the first line therapy with prolgolimab in patients with metastatic melanoma: interim results of the FORA (FOrteca Real practice Assessment) observational study. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2022;24(4):413-25. doi: 10.26442/18151434.2022.4.202035 (in Russian)].
  23. Xu J, Zhao J, Wang, J, et al. Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase for melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100(14):e25318. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025318
  24. Frauchiger AL, Mangana J, Rechsteiner M, et al. Prognostic relevance of LDH and serum S-100 levels in Stage IV melanoma with known BRAF mutation status. Br J Dermatol. 2015;174(4):823-30. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14347
  25. TNM classification of malignant tumours. Ed LH Sobin. 7th ed. NY: Springer-Verlag, 2010.
  26. Greenhalgh J, Mahon J, Richardson M, et al. Pembrolizumab for treating advanced melanoma previously untreated with ipilimumab: A Single Technology Appraisal. LRiG, University of Liverpool, 2015.
  27. Sullivan RJ. What, if Any, Role Is There for BRAF-Targeted Therapy in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma? J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(36):4161-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01066
  28. Ascierto PA, McArthur GA, Dréno B, et al. Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(9):1248-60. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30122-X
  29. van Breeschoten J, Wouters MW, Hilarius DL, et al. First-line BRAF/MEK inhibitors versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy in BRAFV600-mutant advanced melanoma patients: a propensity-matched survival analysis. Br J Cancer. 2021;124(7):1222-30.
  30. An Q, Liu Z. Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1-10.
  31. Kim CG, Kim M, Hwang J, et al. First-line pembrolizumab versus dabrafenib/trametinib treatment for BRAF V600–mutant advanced melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(5):989-96.
  32. Yushak M, Chapman P, Robert C, Kudchadkar R. Systemic therapy options for patients with unresectable melanoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B. 2017;37:661-72. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_174934
  33. Tarhini AA, Toor K, Chan K, et al. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for the treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. ESMO Open. 2021;6(2):100050. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100050
  34. Liu M, Yang X, Liu J, et al. Efficacy and safety of BRAF inhibition alone versus combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32258-69. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15632
  35. Linardou H, Gogas H. Toxicity management of immunotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(14):272. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.07.10

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Progression-free survival (PFS) curves from MAIC of Progolimab versus Darbafenib + Trametinib.

Download (173KB)
3. Fig. 2. OS curves from MAIC of Progolimab versus Darbafenib + Trametinib.

Download (157KB)
4. Fig. 3. PFS curves from MAIC of Progolimab versus Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib.

Download (169KB)
5. Fig. 4. OS curves from MAIC of Progolimab versus Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib.

Download (152KB)
6. Appendix 2. Figure

Download (181KB)
7. Fig. 7.1. Unadjusted PFS curves: Dabrafenib+Trametinib vs Prolgolimab, 24 months.

Download (144KB)
8. Fig. 7.2. Unadjusted OS curves: Dabrafenib+Trametinib vs Prolgolimab, 12 months.

Download (131KB)
9. Fig. 7.3. Unadjusted PFS curves: Vemurafenib+Cobimetinib vs Prolgolimab, 24 months.

Download (143KB)
10. Fig. 7.4. Unadjusted OS curves: Vemurafenib+Cobimetinib vs Prolgolimab, 12 months.

Download (128KB)
11. Fig. 8.1. Unadjusted OS curves: Dabrafenib+Trametinib vs Prolgolimab, 24 months.

Download (134KB)
12. Fig. 8.2. Matching-adjusted OS curves: Dabrafenib+Trametinib vs Prolgolimab, 24 months.

Download (134KB)
13. Fig. 8.3. Unadjusted OS curves: Vemurafenib+Cobimetinib vs Prolgolimab, 24 months.

Download (141KB)
14. Fig. 8.4. Matching-adjusted OS curves: Vemurafenib+Cobimetinib vs Prolgolimab, 24 months.

Download (141KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies