Prevention of febrile neutropenia in oncological patients: real-world data

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To assess the effect of febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in real-world cancer patients.

Materials and methods. We conducted a statistical analysis of anonymized medical records collected in the Webiomed platform. Before analysis, the cards were validated by clinical experts. Electronic records were extracted according to two principles: mentioning D70 in the diagnosis or mentioning a chemotherapy regimen associated with a high risk of FN (≥20%), requiring the primary prevention of neutropenia. Thus, we obtained two datasets comprising 47.085 (590 patients) and 30.523 (398 patients) records, respectively.

Results. Based on the analysis results, the most common risk factors for FN development were highly hematologically toxic chemotherapy regimens and elderly age – about 50% in the adult population. In both datasets, the number of female patients prevailed (63.7% in dataset 1, 91.2% in dataset 2), so the most common was breast cancer. Less common were cervical cancer, digestive cancer, and lung cancer. Despite the indications for primary prevention of FN, for safety and importance of achieving the planned dose intensity, it was administered in 18.3% of patients in dataset 1 and 2.3% in dataset 2. No FN or G-CSF-related adverse events were reported in patients who received adequate primary prevention.

Conclusion. Some issues related to G-CSF administration in cancer patients were identified. We identified the insufficient provision of patients with primary prevention of FN, which negatively affects survival rates and reduces adherence to antitumor therapy. Real-world data demonstrate the efficacy and safety of FN prevention and planned dose intensity maintance in cytotoxic therapy regimens.

About the authors

Kirill V. Sapozhnikov

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Author for correspondence.
Email: marinheira@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2476-7666

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Russian Federation, Moscow

Irina V. Sorokina

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

Email: marinheira@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9404-3698

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

Russian Federation, Moscow

Aleksandr V. Gusev

K-SkAI LLC

Email: marinheira@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7380-8460

Director, K-SkAI LLC

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

Natalia A. Sableva

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: marinheira@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5809-9221

Independent Expert, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Russian Federation, Moscow

Valeriia D. Sokolova

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: vdsokolova94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7335-4852

Independent Expert, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Russian Federation, Moscow

Daria G. Tolkacheva

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: marinheira@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6314-4218

Independent Expert, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna M. Berezina

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: marinheira@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-9140-8747

Independent Expert, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Сакаева Д.Д., Орлова Р.В., Шабаева М.М. Практические рекомендации по лечению инфекционных осложнений фебрильной нейтропении и назначению колониестимулирующих факторов у онкологических больных. Злокачественные опухоли: Практические рекомендации RUSSCO. 2018;8(3s2):521-30 [Sakaeva DD, Orlova RV, Shabaeva MM. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii po lecheniiu infektsionnykh oslozhnenii febril'noi neitropenii i naznacheniiu koloniestimuliruiushchikh faktorov u onkologicheskikh bol'nykh. Zlokachestvennye opukholi: Prakticheskie rekomendatsii RUSSCO. 2018;8(3s2):521-30 (in Russian)].
  2. Punnapuzha S, Edemobi PK, Elmoheen A. Febrile Neutropenia. StatPearls Publishing, 2019.
  3. Weycker D, Silvia A, Hanau A, et al. Abstract P2-08-24: Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with metastatic cancer of the breast or other sites not receiving colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis (CSF) in US clinical practice. Cancer Res. 2020;80(4_Suppl.):P2-08-24-P2-08-24.
  4. Lyman GH, Michels SL, Reynolds MW, et al. Risk of mortality in patients with cancer who experience febrile neutropenia. Cancer. 2010;23(116):5555-63.
  5. Снеговой А.В., Кагония Л.М., Кононенко И.Б., и др. Практические рекомендации по назначению колониестимулирующих факторов с целью профилактики развития фебрильной нейтропении у онкологических больных. Злокачественные опухоли. 2015;4:342-9 [Snegovoi AV, Kagoniia LM, Kononenko IB, et al. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii po naznacheniiu koloniestimuliruiushchikh faktorov s tsel'iu profilaktiki razvitiia febril'noi neitropenii u onkologicheskikh bol'nykh. Zlokachestvennye opukholi. 2015;4:342-9 (in Russian)].
  6. Lyman GH, Reiner M, Morrow PK, Crawford J. The effect of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim on survival outcomes of patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(7):1452-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv174
  7. Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Lyman GH. Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(21):3158-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8823
  8. Ашоур А.З., Литовкин А.В., Белов В.Г., и др. Анализ медико-социальных потребностей онкологических пациентов старшей возрастной группы при оказании паллиативной помощи. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015;5:335 [Ashour AZ, Litovkin AV, Belov VG, et al. Analiz mediko-sotsial'nykh potrebnostei onkologicheskikh patsientov starshei vozrastnoi gruppy pri okazanii palliativnoi pomoshchi. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia. 2015;5:335 (in Russian)].
  9. Литовкин А.В., Парфенов Ю.А., Парфенов С.А., Сапожников К.В. Формы оказания паллиативной помощи лицам старшей возрастной группы с онкологией. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2017;4:58 [Litovkin AV, Parfenov IuA, Parfenov SA, Sapozhnikov KV. Formy okazaniia palliativnoi pomoshchi litsam starshei vozrastnoi gruppy s onkologiei. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia. 2017;4:58 (in Russian)].
  10. Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, et al; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(1):8-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013
  11. Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al. 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3187-205. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451
  12. Vehreschild JJ, Böhme A, Cornely OA, et al. Prophylaxis of infectious complications with colony-stimulating factors in adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy-evidence-based guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party AGIHO of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). Ann Oncol. 2014;25(9):1709-18.
  13. Crawford J, Armitage J, Balducci L, et al. Myeloid growth factors. JNCCN. 2013;11(10):1266-90.
  14. Bennett CL, Djulbegovic B, Norris LB, Armitage JO. Colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia during cancer therapy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(12):1131-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct1210890
  15. Prevention and Management of Neutropenic Sepsis in Cancer Patients. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Guidance. 2012, 22 p.
  16. Новодережкина Е.А., Зырянов С.К. Значение исследований реальной клинической практики в оценке технологий здравоохранения. Фармакоэкономика. Современная фармакоэкономика и фармакоэпидемиология. 2022;15(3):380-9 [Novoderezhkina EA, Zyrianov SK. Znachenie issledovanii real'noi klinicheskoi praktiki v otsenke tekhnologii zdravookhraneniia. Farmakoekonomika. Sovremennaia farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiia. 2022;15(3):380-9 (in Russian)].
  17. Колбин А.С., Белоусов Д.Ю. Краткий отчет о развитии доказательств, основанных на данных реальной клинической практики (RWD/RWE) в 2021 году: США, Россия и Евразийский экономический союз (ЕАЭС). Реальная клиническая практика: данные и доказательства. 2022;2(1):1-9 [Kolbin AS, Belousov DYu. A brief report of real-world evidence development (RWD/RWE) in 2021: United States, Russia, and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Real-World Data & Evidence. 2022;2(1):1-9 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-6.
  18. Faria R, Hernandez Alava M, Manca A, Wailoo AJ. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 17: The use of observational data to inform estimates of treatment effectiveness for Technology Appraisal: Methods for comparative individual patient data. 2015. Available at: http://www.nicedsu.org.uk. Accessed: 14.02.2023.
  19. Колбин А.С. От имени рабочей группы по RWD/RWE в Российской Федерации. Резолюция по результатам работы конференции: «RWD/RWE – Инструменты исследования реальной клинической практики: сегодня и завтра». Реальная клиническая практика: данные и доказательства. 2021;1(1):21-4 [Kolbin AS Resolution based on the results of the conference: “RWD/ RWE – Research Tools of Real-World Clinical Practice Today and Tomorrow”. Real-World Data & Evidence. 2021;1(1):21-4 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-5
  20. Кононенко И.Б., Кагония Л.М., Ларионова В.Б., и др. Клинические рекомендации по назначению колониестимулирующих факторов с целью профилактики развития фебрильной нейтропении. Утверждено на Заседании правления Ассоциации онкологов России. М., 2014 [Kononenko IB, Kagoniia LM, Larionova VB, et al. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii po naznacheniiu koloniestimuliruiushchikh faktorov s tsel'iu profilaktiki razvitiia febril'noi neitropenii. Utverzhdeno na Zasedanii pravleniia Assotsiatsii onkologov Rossii. Moscow, 2014 (in Russian)].
  21. Klastersky J, de Naurois J, Rolston K, et al. Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl. 5):v111-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw325
  22. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2020 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2021 [Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniia v Rossii v 2020 godu (zabolevaemost' i smertnost'). Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena − filial FGBU “NMITs radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2021 (in Russian)].
  23. Snegovoy A, Dergunov A, Tatyanenko A, et al. Defendor: Real-world evidence of primary prolonged G-CSF prophylaxis by empegfilgrastim for relative dose intensity compliance in patients with solid tumors – The primary analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(Suppl. 16):e18788. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18788
  24. Sorokina I, Ganshina I, Ibragimova T, et al. Abstract P3-07-23: Defendor Special: Primary empegfilgrastim prophylaxis (prolonged G-CSF) for optimal treatment outcomes in high risk early breast cancer cohort. The interim analysis. Cancer Res. 2023;83(Suppl. 5):P3-07.
  25. Nielson CM, Bylsma LC, Fryzek JP, et al. Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Solid Tumor Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncologist. 2021;26(9):e1609-18. doi: 10.1002/onco.13822
  26. Aapro M, Boccia R, Leonard R, et al. Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(11):3295-304. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3842-1
  27. Cornes P, Gascon P, Chan S, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia. Adv Ther. 2018;35(11):1816-29. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0798-6

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Procedure of extraction and preparation of real-world data based from electronic medical records.

Download (186KB)
3. Fig. 2. Distribution of patients by malignant neoplasm (MN) location in the dataset (DS) 1, %.

Download (78KB)
4. Fig. 3. Distribution of patients by MN localizations in the DS 2, %.

Download (41KB)
5. Fig. 4. Distribution of patients by cytotoxic therapy regimens in DS 1, %.

Download (48KB)
6. Fig. 5. Distribution of patients by cytotoxic therapy regimens in DS 2, %.

Download (53KB)
7. Fig. 6. Administration rate of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs).

Download (75KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies