Principles of requests’ formulation to artificial intelligence technologies as a component of interaction strategies
- 作者: Avramenko A.P.1
-
隶属关系:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- 期: 卷 30, 编号 5 (2025)
- 页面: 1083-1090
- 栏目: THEORY AND METHODS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1810-0201/article/view/358584
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-5-1083-1090
- ID: 358584
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Importance. In light of the rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in both practical and research applications, the formulation of queries assumes a pivotal role in human–machine interaction strategies. This article delves into the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs) and systematically explores effective prompting principles, highlighting their significance in enhancing the accuracy, consistency, and controllability of AI-generated outputs. Our objective is to construct a comprehensive taxonomy of query types within the framework of interaction strategies.
Materials and Methods. To accomplish this, we employ methods of analysis and synthesis of existing theoretical and practical materials related to this subject. These materials are drawn from studies conducted over the past three years, exploring various approaches to optimizing human–machine communication.
Results and Discussion. The findings of the investigation reveal that there exist several types of inquiries at the initial phase of engagement with the model. Following these queries, a dialogue ensues to validate the accuracy of the provided responses. The algorithm for effective interaction with the machine necessitates specific skills that can be evaluated based on specific criteria and the metrics of the obtained response.
Conclusion. Establishing standardization for query generation processes is crucial for ensuring the secure and responsible utilization of AI in large-scale applications. Consequently, the development of interdisciplinary programs focused on crafting strategies for interacting with AI should be prioritized in future research endeavors.
作者简介
A. Avramenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: avram4ik@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-3004-2192
SPIN 代码: 7197-9077
Scopus 作者 ID: 57221929626
Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor of the Linguistics and Information Technologies Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Area Studies
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation参考
- Korzynski P., Mazurek G., Krzypkowska P., Kurasniski A. (2023). Artificial intelligence prompt engineering as a new digital competence: analysis of generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 25-37. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110302, https://elibrary.ru/wczzrp
- Sysoyev P.V. (2025). A modern teacher’s competence in the field of artificial intelligence: structure and content. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 58-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-6-58-79, https://elibrary.ru/zjmqfd
- Fox Tree J., Herring S.C., Nguyen A., Whittaker S., Martin R., Takayama L. (2024). Conversational fluency and attitudes towards robot pilots in telepresence robot-mediated interaction. Journal of Computer Sup-ported Cooperative Work, no. 33, pp. 473-498.
- Oppenlaender J. (2024). A taxonomy of prompt modifiers for text-to-image generation. Behaviour & Infor-mation Technology, vol. 43, issue 15, pp. 3763-3776. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.13988
- Si C., Gan Zh., Yang Zhe. et al. (2023). Prompting GPT‑3 to be reliable. The 11th International Conference on Learning Representaions. Kigali, pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.09150
- Cao Y.T., Pruksachatkun Y., Chang K.-W., Gupta R., Kumar V., Dhamala J., Galstyan A. (2022). On the intrinsic and extrinsic fairness evaluation metrics for contextualized language representations. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 561-570. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.62
- Ekin S. (2023). Prompt engineering for ChatGPT: a quick guide to techniques, tips, and best practices. TechRxiv, vol. 1, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.22683919.v2
- Kovari A. (2024). ChatGPT the omniscient? A guide to effective prompting. 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference and Workshop Óbuda on Electrical and Power Engineering (CANDO‑EPE). Budapest, pp. 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1109/CANDO-EPE65072.2024.10772984
- Kim J., Park S., Jeong K. et al. (2023). Which is better? Exploring prompting strategy for LLM‑based metrics. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison on NLP Systems. Bali, Indinesia, pp. 164-183. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.03754
- Bhandari P. (2022). A survey on prompting techniques in LLMs. AI Aligment Forum, pp. 1-10.
- Fagbohun O., Harrison R.M., Dereventsov A. (2023). An empirical categorization of prompting techniques for large language models: a practitioner’s guide. The 4th International Conference on AI, ML, Data Science, and Robotics, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.14837
- Avramenko A.P., Matveeva O.Yu. (2020). Evaluating the level of interaction strategies of master’s degree students of non-philological specialties (French as a second foreign language). Rhema. Rema, no. 3, pp. 53-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2020-3-53-64, https://elibrary.ru/hcnroj
- Yu Z., He L., Wu Zh. et al. (2023). Towards better chain‑of‑thought prompting strategies: a survey. ArXiv, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.04959
- Chang E.Y. (2023). Prompting large language models with the Socratic method. 2023 IEEE 13th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC). Las Vegas, pp. 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCWC57344.2023.10099179
补充文件


