Public moods of peasants and agrarian utopia in the works of Russian Neo-Narodniks
- Authors: Viazinkin A.Y.1, Yakimov K.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Tambov State Technical University
- Issue: Vol 27, No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 1062-1069
- Section: NATIONAL HISTORY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1810-0201/article/view/298280
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2022-27-4-1062-1069
- ID: 298280
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The ideas of the Neo-Narodism’s intelligentsia about the socio-political moods and psychology of the Russian peasantry and building on the basis of these ideas and the basic provisions of the classical populism of agrarian utopia are studied. The relevance of the study lies in the creation of a theoretical base for studying in the field of generational (generation of “revolutionary turning point”) and intellectual (phenomenon of agrarianism in Russian thought) history. The purpose of this research is to study the problem of the historical role of the peasantry and the fate of the Russian village in the ideology of Neo-Narodism. During the study, analytical and historicalcomparative methods were used. As a result of the analysis of historical sources, it is concluded that the Neo-Narodism’s ideas about the Russian peasantry, despite the sharply changing sociocultural and revolutionary political circumstances, remained mainly in line with the ideas of classical populism. Adepts of folk studies turned to the problem of the growth of protest moods in the peasant sphere and found out that it was caused by the problem of land shortage that worsened during the revolutionary turning point. Neo-Narodnik V.G. Bogoraz notes the conservatism of a significant part of rural residents who were distrustful of revolutionary ideas. A.V. Chayanov’s utopian project went beyond the boundaries of purely populist thought, entered into an alliance with scientific agrarianism and took into account the political circumstances that developed after the establishment of Bolshevik power and the domination of Marxist ideology.
About the authors
A. Y. Viazinkin
Tambov State Technical University
Email: vyazinkin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3821-6168
Candidate of Philosophy, Senior Research Scholar
106 Sovetskaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian FederationK. A. Yakimov
Tambov State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: gnom-gnom123@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1756-3515
Candidate of History, Senior Research Scholar
106 Sovetskaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian FederationReferences
- Viazinkin A.Y. Pokoleniye «revolyutsionnogo pereloma» v sud’be russkoy derevni pervoy treti XX v.: problemy istoriografii [Generation of the “Revolutionary Turning Point” in the fate of the russian village in the first third of the 20th century: problems of historiography]. Voprosy istorii [History Questions], 2022, no. 7-2, pp. 153-165. https://doi.org/10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202207Statyi46. (In Russian).
- Redfield R. Narodnoye obshchestvo (glavy 1–2) [The Folk Society (chapters 1-2)]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obsh-chestvo – Personality. Culture. Society, 2008, vol. 10, no. 5-6 (44-45), pp. 99-113. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/220015. (In Russian).
- Redfield R. Narodnoye obshchestvo (prodolzheniye) [The Folk Society (continued)]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obsh-chestvo – Personality. Culture. Society, 2009, vol. 10, no. 1 (46-47), pp. 53-58. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/220015. (In Russian).
- Zhvania D.D. I.I. Kablits o krest’yanskoy obshchine i samobytnoy modernizatsii Rossii [I.I. Kablitz about the peasant community and the original modernization of Russia]. Istoriya i istoriografiya pravogo narodni-chestva [History and Historiography of Right-Wing Populism]. Voronezh, Istoki Publ., 2014, pp. 175-185. (In Russian).
- Kablitz I.I. Osnovy narodnichestva: v 2 ch. [The Basics of Populism: in 2 pts.]. St. Petersburg, N.A. Lebedeva Publ., 1888, pt 1, 464 p. (In Russian).
- Tan V.G. (Bogoraz). Narodnoye predstavitel’stvo [National Representation]. Moscow, P.K. Pryannikov's typoli-thography Publ., 1905, 48 p. (In Russian).
- Tan V.G. (Bogoraz). Novoye krest’yanstvo [New Peasantry]. Moscow, A.P. Poplavsky Publ., 1905, 126 p. (In Russian).
- Tan V.G. (Bogoraz). Muzhiki v Gosudarstvennoy dume: ocherki [Men in the State Duma: Essays]. Moscow, V.M. Sablina Publ., 1907, 72 p. (In Russian).
- Chayanov A.V. Osnovnyye idei i formy organizatsii sel’skokhozyaystvennoy kooperatsii [Main Ideas and Forms of the Organization of Agricultural Cooperation]. Moscow, Science Publ., 1991, 456 p. (In Russian).
- Hobsbawm E. Epokha kraynostey: Korotkiy dvadtsatyy vek (1914–1991) [Era of Extremes: Short Twentieth Century (1914–1991)]. Moscow, Independent Newspaper Publ., 2004. 632 p. (In Russian).
- Levada Y.A. Ishchem cheloveka: Sotsiologicheskiye ocherki, 2000–2005 [Looking for Man: Sociological Es-says, 2000–2005]. Moscow, Novoye Izdatelstvo Publ., 2006, 384 p. (In Russian).
- Kuznetsov I.A. Rossiyskaya agrarno-ekonomicheskaya mysl’ v tyunenovskoy perspektive (1875–1925) [Russian agrarian and economic thought in the Tyunensky perspective (1875–1925)]. Istoriya mysli. Russkaya myslitel’naya traditsiya [History of Thought. Russian Thought Tradition]. Moscow, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 376-411. (In Russian).
- Nikulin A.M. Chayanovskiy utopizm: balansiruya sredi krizisov intensifikatsii optimumov [Chayanovian uto-pian visions: looking for the balance under the crises of optima intensification]. Krest’yanovedeniye – Russian Peasant Studies, 2017, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6-30. https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2017-2-1-6-30. (In Russian).
- Chayanov A.V. Moskovskaya gofmaniada [Moscow Gofmaniada]. Moscow, TONCHU Publ., 2006, 352 p. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
