The use of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire in assessing the quality of life of military personnel
- Authors: Dybin A.S.1,2, Shapovalov P.Y.3
-
Affiliations:
- North State Medical University
- Military Unit 69008-2
- Military Unit 95420
- Issue: Vol 22, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 143-150
- Section: QUALITY OF LIFE
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1728-2810/article/view/264721
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/socm625893
- ID: 264721
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of the quality of life of military personnel as the basis of the country's defense capability, there is currently no unified methodology for studying this indicator. One of the main factors limiting the use of many existing quality-of-life questionnaires is the medical and social characteristics of the military population, which initially imply a higher level of health of respondents, as well as a special ratio of the number of healthy to practically healthy and to those with chronic diseases. These factors determine the urgency of searching for easy-to-use and informative tools for assessing the quality of life of military personnel, allowing them to evaluate both the desired indicator and serve as an indicator of the effectiveness of interventions in the field of military health.
AIM: To assess the quality of life, which is related to the health of military personnel using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire.
METHODS: In the course of a sociological study of the quality of life of military personnel in 2023, a questionnaire was conducted using EQ-5D-3L. The sample size was 500 observation units. The survey data were evaluated by the official methodology and compared with the data of the Russian population study. The analysis of variance using the Kraskel–Wallis criterion, a posteriori, and comparative analysis using the Mann–Whitney criterion were used.
RESULTS: The negative dynamics of EQ-VAS with age and the absence of differences in assessment depending on the level of education were confirmed, at the same time, it was found that grades on this scale for secondary and higher education in military personnel were lower than in the Russian population. The proportion of respondents who indicated the health profile "11111" among military personnel turned out to be one and a half times higher than in the Russian population. Significant differences in the index of the health status of military personnel between some age groups have been established, as well as higher rates for single people compared with married respondents.
CONCLUSION: The use of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire will create normative indicators to describe the quality of life of military personnel, and will also contribute to the formation of health indices and weight coefficients for further analysis, evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical trials involving representatives of this social group. One of the main conclusions of the article is that the Internet is the most preferred source of health information for Russians today, especially for young people.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Alexey S. Dybin
North State Medical University; Military Unit 69008-2
Author for correspondence.
Email: asdmma@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1907-9276
SPIN-code: 4135-1717
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Arkhangelsk; SeverodvinskPavel Yu. Shapovalov
Military Unit 95420
Email: pavel_1984@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8940-4145
SPIN-code: 3938-9877
Russian Federation, Severodvinsk
References
- Aleksandrova EA, Khabibullina AR. Health-related quality of life measurement using EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Medical Journal of the Russian Federation. 2019;25(4):202-209. EDN: YTBBBT doi: 10.18821/0869-2106-2019-25-4-202-209
- Makarova EI, Yagudina RI. Methodology of Calculation of QALY in Pharmacoeconomic modelling: Using Questionnaires of Study of Patient’s Quality of Life. Pharmacoeconomic: theory and practice. 2018;6(1):7-12. EDN: YUZYLG doi: 10.30809/phe.1.2018.1
- Akulova AI, Gaydukova IZ, Rebrov AP. Validation of the EQ-5D-5L version in Russia. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018;56(3):351-355 EDN: UXBXMW doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2018-351-355
- Andreev DA, Zavyalov AA, Kashurnikov AYu. Two basic versions of the EQ-5D questionnaire as standard international instruments for assessing the quality of life in metropolis. City Healthcare. 2021;2(1):62-69. EDN: XPYTTS doi: 10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2021.v2i1;62-69
- Omelyanovskiy V, Musina N, Ratushnyak S, et al. Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L in Russia. Quality of Life Research. 2021;30(7):1997-2007. EDN: WGYLHS doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02804-6
- Wailoo A, Alava MH, Pudney S, et al. An International Comparison of EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Value in Health. 2021;24(4):568-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.012
- Van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng Y-S, et al. Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets. Value in Health. 2012;15(5):708-715. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008
- Aleksandrova EA, Khabibullina AR, Aistov AV, et al. Russian population health-related quality of life indicators calculated using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Siberian Scientific Medical Journal. 2020;40(3):99-107 EDN: QEMBAH doi: 10.15372/SSMJ20200314
- Hernández Alava M, Pudney S, Wailoo A. Estimating the Relationship Between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L: Results from a UK Population Study. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023;41(2):199-207. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01218-7
Supplementary files
