Comparative assessment of the preventive efficacy of Individual oral hygiene products in persons with decompensated caries

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Background. The violation of the marginal tightness of composite restorations and the recurrence of the carious process remains relevant to this day, especially in persons with a decompensated form of caries activity. In this regard, of undoubted interest is the possibility of a wide preventive effect of individual oral hygiene products with a remineralizing effect, particularly those containing brushite crystals. Brushite crystals have unique adhesive properties and tropism to hydroxyapatite crystals on the enamel surface. The principal mechanism of action of the “RemarsGel” system is a chemical reaction that occurs when calcium nitrate from tube # 1 is mixed with ammonium hydrogen phosphate from tube # 2, as a result of which a brushite crystal is formed on the surface of the teeth. Material and methods. From a clinical point of view, this study compared the clinical efficacies of a standard prophylaxis program (using traditional fluoride-containing personal oral hygiene products) of carious recurrence in patients with a high degree of caries activity and a developed program for using a natural two-component complex to strengthen and remineralize RemarsGel enamel. The effectiveness of the applied technique was monitored using clinical research methods immediately after sanitation and 1, 12, and 36 months after it. Results. The high efficiency of brushite crystals was established in terms of preventing violations of the integrity of the enamel–composite joint, which has a direct and immediate effect on the recurrence of the carious process. A statistically significant difference in the Ryge criteria was found between group Nos. 1 and 2. These results were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy and statistical processing of the research results. Conclusion. A scientifically based indication of the intended use of the system must be added to the list of main indications for use — in the presence of a significant amount of adhesive restorations in the oral cavity, made using direct and indirect methods, especially with decompensate caries.

About the authors

Vladimir V. Sadovsky

Institute of Scientific and Research Management in Dentistry

Author for correspondence.
Email: sadovsky@bk.ru

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Honorary President of the Dental Association of Russia, Director of Institute of Scientific and Research Management in Dentistry

Russian Federation, Moscow

I. E. Esaulenko

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: sadovsky@bk.ru
Russian Federation, Voronezh

B. R. Shumilovich

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: sadovsky@bk.ru
Russian Federation, Voronezh

V. A. Kunin

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: sadovsky@bk.ru
Russian Federation, Voronezh

V. V. Rostovtsev

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: sadovsky@bk.ru
Russian Federation, Voronezh

References

  1. Shumilovich BR, Vorob'eva YB, Malykhina IE, Chertovskikh AV. Modern ideas about the crystal structure of hydroxyapatite and the processes of age-related changes in tooth enamel (in vitro study). Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. 2015;4(1):77–86. (in Russian)
  2. Shumilovich BR, Saneev AV, Malykhina IE, Chertovskikh AV. Morphological features of the microstructure of enamel and dentin during their preparation with a rotary instrument (in vitro study). Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. 2016;5(1):69–75. (in Russian)
  3. Boer VM. Discussion on modern concepts of adhesive sealing. Part 1. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2001;(4):12–15. (in Russian)
  4. Shumilovich BR, Kosolapov VP, Rostovtsev VV, Filippova ZA. Modern aspects of solving the problem of bacterial contamination of various components of dental care. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2018;97(8):743–749. (in Russian)
  5. Sadovskiy VV. Clinical technologies of caries blocking. Moscow: Meditsinskaya kniga; 2005. 72 p. (in Russian)
  6. Shumilovich BR, Saneev AV, Malykhina IE, Chertovskikh AV. Technology of enamel sealing with the use of self-adhesive fluid composite when filling the chewing group of teeth. Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. 2016;5(1):69–75. (in Russian)
  7. Ippolitov YA. The importance of the organic component of the hard tissues of the tooth for the prevention of the destructive process. Vestnik Instituta stomatologii. 2006;(2):41–46. (in Russian)
  8. Yudina NA, Leus PA. A new integral indicator of dental status and its use in scientific research. Institut stomatologii. 2010;(1):86–88. (in Russian)
  9. Ron' GI, Mandra YV. On the choice of bonding systems in the treatment of caries. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 1999;(1):48–51. (in Russian)
  10. Batyukov NM. System analysis of dental hard tissues based on optical and electrical probing signals (Parts I-III). Institut stomatologii. 2007;(1):102–105. (in Russian)
  11. Terri D, Leynfild K, Dzheyms A. Minimally invasive technique. The concept and principles of adhesion. Dental Times. 2010;(4):6–8. (in Russian)
  12. Tey F. The status quo and the future of dentin adhesives. DentArt. 2003;(2):13–16. (in Russian)
  13. Kimishima T, Nara Y, Hasegawa M. Adhesive strength for single-step adhesive systems. In: Proceedings of the 83rd Conference of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR); Baltimor, Maryland, USA; 9-12 March 2005.
  14. Lutts F. Discussion on the issue of modern concepts of adhesive filling. Part II. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2001;(4):15–18. (in Russian)
  15. Shumilovich BR, Besek M, Rostovtsev VV, et al. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the state of the enamel-composite compound when using individual oral hygiene products containing brushite. Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. 2018;7(3):92–99. (in Russian)
  16. Lutskaya I, Gorbachev V. Justification of the principle of adhesive preparation. Cathedra. 2013;(43):48–54. (in Russian)
  17. Makeeva IM, Khaustova EA. Evaluation of the marginal integrity of composite materials by the method of resistivity. In: MMSI 75 let: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Moscow; 1997. (in Russian)
  18. Khiora ZP. Expanding the possibilities of direct aesthetic restoration of the frontal group of teeth with the help of «sandwich technology”. Maestro stomatologii. 2005;(1):10–17. (in Russian)
  19. Khiora ZP. Aesthetic restoration of teeth with the use of nanocomposites. Clinical Atlas: textbook. manual for dental students. Saint Petersburg; 2007. 144 p. (in Russian)
  20. Shpak TA. Adhesive systems in modern dentistry. Part I. Institut stomatologii. 2005;(1):93–95. (in Russian)
  21. Shpak TA. Adhesive systems in modern dentistry. Part II. Institut stomatologii. 2005;(2):42–44. (in Russian)
  22. Dubova MA. Adhesive systems in modern dentistry. Institut stomatologii. 2005;(1):93–95. (in Russian)
  23. Nikolaenko SA, Shapiro LA, Zubarev AI. The influence of parameters of the hybrid layer on the adhesion of a modern composite. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2009;(3):48–51. (in Russian)
  24. Petrikas OA, Petrikas IV. Adhesive technologies. How serious is it? (Components of the success of adhesive technologies). Novoe v stomatologii. 1998;(9):3–7. (in Russian)
  25. Terikhova TN. Current data on the composition, structure and properties of hard tooth tissues. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2002;(1):27–34. (in Russian)
  26. Shumilovich BR, Mironova VV, Vorob'eva YB. Laboratory analysis of the quality of applying the adhesive system to the surface of enamel and dentin as a prevention of recurrent caries in the treatment of the chewing group of teeth. Stomatologiya detskogo vozrasta i profilaktika. 2015;XIV(1):10–13. (in Russian)
  27. Shumilovich BR, Chertovskikh AV, Vorob'eva YB. Achieving reliable adhesion in clinical practice. Laboratory tests of Ketchant Gel and Clearfil SE Bond self-adhesive System (Kuraray). Dental Market. 2015;(4):32–35. (in Russian)
  28. Brackett WW, Ito S, Nishitani Y, et al. The microtensile bond strength of self-etching ad-hesives to ground enamel. Oper Dent. 2006;31(3):332–337.
  29. Haller V, Blunck U. Review and analysis of modern adhesive systems. Novoe v stomatologii. 2004;(1):11–19. (in Russian)
  30. Joffe E. How to choose a material for the adhesive technique? Novoe v stomatologii. 2000;(1):19–22. (in Russian)
  31. Krejci I, Placek M, Stavridakis M. New perspectives in dentine adhesion — different types of joints. Novoe v stomatologii. 2002;(6):21–24. (in Russian)
  32. Liebenberg WH. Test period for adhesive dentistry. Stomatologiya. 2000;(1):52–53. (in Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Comparative characteristics of the studied contingent in terms of Ryge immediately after rehabilitation (A) and 1 month later (B): NewVar0 - 1st group (control); NewVar1 - 2nd group (experimental).

Download (240KB)
3. Fig. 2. Comparative characteristics of the studied contingent in terms of Ryge 12 (A) and 36 (B) months after sanation: NewVar0 - 1st group (control); NewVar1 - 2nd group (experimental).

Download (251KB)
4. Fig. 3. Cluster analysis.

Download (163KB)
5. Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Scanning electron microscopy of the enamel-composite compound immediately after treatment (group 1, control).

Download (211KB)
6. Fig. 5. Scanning electron microscopy of the enamel-composite compound immediately after treatment (group 2, experimental).

Download (232KB)
7. Fig. 6. Scanning electron microscopy of the enamel-composite compound after treatment with Colgate Total 12 (group 1, control).

Download (526KB)
8. Fig. 7. Scanning electron microscopy of the enamel-composite joint after treatment with "RemarsGel" (group 2, experimental).

Download (249KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies