Study of the duration of the retention period in patients with the combined pathology of occlusion of the dentition

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most severe categories of pediatric patients is those with concomitant dental occlusion. Owing to the increase in the quality and effectiveness of orthodontic care nowadays and the reduction in the duration of the treatment stage in pediatric patients with orthodontic problems with concomitant dental occlusion, the duration of the retention period and retention devices used should be analyzed, which is the aim of this study.

AIM: To analyze the duration of the retention period in patients with concomitant dental occlusion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study enrolled 26 children aged 6–18 years with dental occlusion in the second and third planes who were taken for orthodontic treatment. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 14 children aged 6–16 years with dental occlusion in two planes (53.85%). All patients underwent orthodontic treatment using removable and non-removable orthodontic devices. Group 2 included 12 children aged 7–18 years with dental occlusion in three planes (46.15%).

RESULTS: After orthodontic treatment, the duration of the retention period was analyzed in children with concomitant dental occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS: Retention of the achieved result after correction of concomitant dental dentition is an important stage of the rehabilitation process. During the retention period, which lasted for 16–24 months in group 1 and 19–32 months in group 2, all patients had inactivated removable and non-removable retention devices, specially made for this purpose.

About the authors

Victor M. Vodolatsky

Stavropol State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vmv.st@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5124-2112

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Stavropol

Ruslan S. Makatov

Stavropol State Medical University

Email: Makatov2008@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6573-9282
SPIN-code: 6238-7009
ResearcherId: GWV-1997-2022
Russian Federation, Stavropol

References

  1. Johnston CD, Littlewood SJ. Retention in orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2015;218(3):119–22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.47
  2. Zachrisson BU. Multistranded wire bonded retainers: from start to success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(5):724–727. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.015
  3. Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, et al. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(1):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub4
  4. Statovskaya EE, Petrova NP, Efremenko EI. Types of retention devices. Saint Petersburg: SZGMU; 2016. 36 p. (In Russ).
  5. Kuznetsova MYu, Sevbitov AV, Dorofeev AE, et al. Analysis of results of retention in patients, who passes orthodontic treatment on the non-removable equipment. Challenges in Modern Medicine. 2020;43(3):412–423. (In Russ). doi: 10.18413/2687-0940-2020-43-3-412-423

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Hawley retention device.

Download (34KB)
3. Fig. 2. Removable retainer of own design (a) in the oral cavity (b).

Download (121KB)
4. Fig. 3. Fixed wire retainer.

Download (35KB)
5. Fig. 4. Retention mouthguard.

Download (32KB)
6. Fig. 5. Tongue spikes.

Download (41KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Vodolatsky V.M., Makatov R.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies