Email this article Elastomeric impression materials used in modern orthopedic dentistry
- Authors: Bordina G.E.1, Lopina N.P.1, Andreev A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Tver State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 27, No 6 (2023)
- Pages: 561-569
- Section: Reviews
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1728-2802/article/view/254408
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent606650
- ID: 254408
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
This article presents a review of elastomeric impression materials currently used in orthopedic dentistry. The elastomer group is divided into silicone, polyester, and thiocol (polysulfide) materials. Silicone impression materials are widely used in orthopedic dentistry. Their structural basis is polymethylsiloxane with active terminal hydroxyl groups. Polyester materials consist of the main and catalyst components (pastes). The main component contains a polymer with imine groups, fillers, and plasticizers. Sulfonic acid ester is present in the catalyst paste. When these two components are mixed, ionic (cationic) polymerization occurs. Polysulfide materials are produced as base and catalyst pastes. The structural unit of the main paste is polysulfide or mercaptan rubber, and the catalyst paste acts as an oxidizer. Lead dioxide is often used as an oxidizer. The resulting polymer does not have a stereoregular structure, which causes its stickiness. It is technologically challenging to obtain a polymer with a stereoregular structure.
When theoretically comparing the listed types of elastomeric impression materials, according to their properties, chemical composition, advantages, and disadvantages, polyester and polysulfide impression materials can be distinguished as more advanced. Silicone materials have disadvantages; however, they are often used for domestic dentistry owing to the presence of domestic manufacturers and relatively low cost.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Galina E. Bordina
Tver State Medical University
Email: gbordina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6375-7981
SPIN-code: 1313-2983
Cand. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, 4 Sovetskaya street, 170000 TverNadezhda P. Lopina
Tver State Medical University
Email: n.lopina@internet.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7213-1531
SPIN-code: 1216-3570
Cand. Sci. (Chemistry), Professor
Russian Federation, 4 Sovetskaya street, 170000 TverAlexey A. Andreev
Tver State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: aandreev01@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1012-9356
Russian Federation, 4 Sovetskaya street, 170000 Tver
References
- Poloneichik NM. The history of the development and application of impression material in dentistry. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2019;(2):84–88. EDN: EGVFML
- Sharafiddinova FA, Zajniev SS, Kamariddinzoda MK. Evaluation of the results of prosthetic treatment of patients with complete absence of teeth on the lower jaw. Dostizheniya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020;(6):53–58. (In Russ). EDN: EPZKFU
- Jaroenpiboon A, Apinsathanon P, Na Nan P, Aimjirakul N. The effects of abutment finish lines on the penetration characteristics of elastomers into the simulated gingival sulcus. Eur J Dent. 2023;17(4):1129–1136. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759697
- Choi JJE, Chen S, Waddell JN. Investigation of dental elastomers as oral mucosa simulant materials. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021;7(5):754–762. doi: 10.1002/cre2.399
- Prohorova EV, Dunaev SA, Afanas’eva A, et al. The choice of impression materials in relation to the clinical situation and the shelf life of the finished impressions (review article). Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2023;30(2):43–47. EDN: DEDDAU doi: 10.24412/1609-2163-2023-2-43-47
- Cevik P, Kocacikli M. Three-dimensional printing technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prosthesis: a case report. Int J Artif Organs. 2020;43(5):343–347. doi: 10.1177/0391398819887401
- Remezova AD, Baroyan MA. Choice of impression materials in orthopedic dentistry. In: Modern problems of science and education. Materials of XI International Student Scientific Conference. 2019. P. 63. (In Russ). EDN: OAQVAZ
- Theocharidou A, Tzimas K, Tolidis K, Tortopidis D. Evaluation of elastomeric impression materials’ hydrophilicity: an in vitro study. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021;55(3):256–263. doi: 10.15644/asc55/3/3
- Homidov HM. Impression materials in prostheric dentistry. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2019;(6-2):173–175. EDN: AGGLLH
- Polonejchik NM. Methods of automatic mixing of non — aqueous elastomeric impression materials and their application. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2019;(4):84–90. EDN: XDXCJZ
- Huettig F, Klink A, Kohler A, et al. Flowability, tear strength, and hydrophilicity of current elastomers for dental impressions. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(11):2994. doi: 10.3390/ma14112994
- Vieira SNV, Lourenço MF, Pereira RC, et al. Conventional and digital impressions for fabrication of complete implant-supported bars: a comparative in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(11):4176. doi: 10.3390/ma16114176
- Bordina GE, Lopina NP, Andreev AA, Nekrasov IA. Dynamics of adhesive systems development in dental practice. Rossijskij stomatologicheskij zhurnal. 2022;26(1):63–74. EDN: VFBFQC
- Grande F, Celeghin G, Gallinaro F, et al. Comparison of the accuracy between full-arch digital scans and scannable impression materials: an in vitro study. Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2023;72(4):168–175. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04766-6
- Ud Din S, Khattak O, Chaudhary FA, et al. Comparison of the elastic recovery and strain-in-compression of commercial and novel vinyl polysiloxane impression materials incorporating a novel crosslinking agent and a surfactant. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15677. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15677
- Dondokov AYu, Sahanov AA, Semeleva EI. Effect of observing the proportions of alginate impression material on shrinkage. Medicine and Education. 2022;(3):6–10. EDN: TBVMDS
- Ud Din S, Parker S, Braden M, Patel M. Improved water absorption behaviour of experimental hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials incorporating a crosslinking agent and a novel surfactant. Dent Mater. 2021;37(6):1054–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.019
- Gordeeva VS, Shiryaeva SO. Study of the effect of disinfecting solution of electrochemically activated water on the structure of silicone impression materials. In: Science Week — 2022. Materials of the International Youth Forum; Stavropol; 2022 Nov 28–Dec 02; Stavropol: Stavropol’skij gosudarstvennyj medicinskij universitet; 2022. P. 573–574. (In Russ). EDN: SRICVK
- Zorina YuYu, Oreshaka OV, Ganisik AV, et al. Comparative characteristics of the depth of penetration of silicone impression materials into the dental groove depending on the receipt of the impression (in the experiment). Medicine in Kuzbass. 2023;22(1):12–16. EDN: WBQIPT doi: 10.24412/2687-0053-2023-1-12-16
- DE Luca M, Bevilacqua L. Impression heater: effectiveness of the thermal accelerator of dental impressions. Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2023;72(1):16–23. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.22.04676-9
- Singer L, Habib SI, Shalaby HE, et al. Digital assessment of properties of the three different generations of dental elastomeric impression materials. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02419-4
- Fraile C, Ferreiroa A, Romeo M, et al. Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(2):1957–1962. Corrected and republished from: Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(6):4673. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04174-2
- Ud Din S, Chaudhary FA, Ahmed B, et al. Comparison of the hardness of novel experimental vinyl poly siloxane (VPS) impression materials with commercially available ones. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:1703869. doi: 10.1155/2022/1703869
- Al-Ansari A. Which final impression technique and material is best for complete and removable partial dentures? Evid Based Dent. 2019;20(3):70–71. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0039-0
- Pandey P, Mantri S, Bhasin A, Deogade SC. Mechanical properties of a new vinyl polyether silicone in comparison to vinyl polysiloxane and polyether elastomeric impression materials. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019;10(2):203–207. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_324_18
- Liu X, Wang X, Wu J, et al. Synthesis of a novel injectable alginate impression material and impression accuracy evaluation. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022;40(6):662–667. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2022.06.006
- Carrilho Baltazar Vaz IM, Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho JF. Marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated after conventional impression making and digital scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(2):223.e1–223.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.011
- Khan SA, Tushar, Nezam S, et al. Comparison and evaluation of linear dimensional accuracy of three elastomeric impression materials at different time intervals using vision inspection system: an in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020;10(6):736–742. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_282_20
- Rech-Ortega C, Fernández-Estevan L, Solá-Ruíz MF, et al. Comparative in vitro study of the accuracy of impression techniques for dental implants: direct technique with an elastomeric impression material versus intraoral scanner. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(1):e89–e95. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22822
- Rajasimhan NV, Jayaraman S, Ali DJ, Subramanian B. Evaluation of cytotoxicity levels of poly vinyl ether silicone, polyether, and poly vinyl siloxane impression materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019;19(4):332–337. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_261_19
- Chen LR, Liang XJ, Yang FY, Luo H. Clinical effect of digital impression combined with all-ceramic denture on restoration of 60 patients with dental defects. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2022;31(3):313–317.
Supplementary files
