Association between biophilia, self-perceived emotional state, and brain bioelectrical activity during the perception of natural and urban landscapes
- Authors: Razumnikova O.М.1
-
Affiliations:
- Novosibirsk State Technical University
- Issue: Vol 31, No 8 (2024)
- Pages: 575-585
- Section: ORIGINAL STUDY ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1728-0869/article/view/314537
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco643220
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IFZNED
- ID: 314537
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies suggest that exposure to natural environments reduces stress and enhances emotional well-being, often accompanied by decreased cortical activation. In contrast, urban environments produce the opposite effect. However, the specific electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythms and brain regions involved in relaxation mechanisms, as well as the factors contributing to individual differences in these responses, remain unclear.
AIM: To examine the relationship between biophilia, self-reported emotional state, and brain bioelectrical activity during the perception of natural and urban landscapes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 83 university students (mean age 20.0±1.5 years) who assessed their biophilia and emotional response (valence, arousal, and amplitude) after watching custom-made films depicting either natural or urban landscapes. EEG recordings (19-channel) were obtained from 37 participants. Psychometric assessments of biophilia and emotional self-perception were analyzed in relation to EEG frequency-spatial activity across seven spectral bands.
RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was observed between biophilia scores and self-reported arousal in response to both natural and urban landscapes (0.41< Rs< 0.51, 0.01< p< 0.05, Spearman’s test). Natural landscapes elicited positive emotions, whereas urban environments induced negative emotional responses. A positive correlation of arousal levels during natural landscape perception was observed in low-frequency delta and theta EEG bands, both in the baseline state and during film viewing (0.40< Rs< 0.72, 0.005< p< 0.05). The perception of natural landscapes was associated with arousal/valence modulation in alpha and beta rhythms, primarily localized in the frontal and temporoparietal regions, with a left-hemisphere dominance. In contrast, urban landscapes exhibited greater right-hemisphere activation. The correlation with psychometric self-assessment of biophilia was observed in baseline EEG alpha and gamma frequencies.
CONCLUSION: Watching natural landscapes induces positive emotional states, whereas urban environments trigger negative emotional responses. Psychometric biophilia scores and emotional self-assessments are reflected in baseline brain activity patterns, with enhanced relaxation effects following exposure to natural landscapes and attenuated effects after urban stimulus exposure. EEG correlates of emotional self-assessment indicate predominant left-hemisphere engagement in natural landscape perception, whereas urban landscapes are associated with greater right-hemisphere activation.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Olga М. Razumnikova
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: razom@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7831-9404
SPIN-code: 6016-6988
Dr. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, NovosibirskReferences
- Borrell-Carrió F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):576–582. doi: 10.1370/afm.245
- Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137(5):535–544. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.5.535
- Extremera N, Sánchez-Álvarez N, Rey L. Pathways between ability emotional intelligence and subjective well-being: bridging links through cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Sustainability. 2020;12(5):2111. doi: 10.3390/su12052111
- Menefee DS, Ledoux T, Johnston CA. The importance of emotional regulation in mental health. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2022;16(1):28–31. doi: 10.1177/15598276211049771
- Song Y, Lu H, Hu S, et al. Regulating emotion to improve physical health through the amygdala. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015;10(4):523–530. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu083
- Tsujimoto M, Saito T, Matsuzaki Y, et al. Role of positive and negative emotion regulation in well-being and health: the interplay between positive and negative emotion regulation abilities is linked to mental and physical health. J Happiness Stud. 2024;25:25. doi: 10.1007/s10902-024-00714-1
- Dean JH, Shanahan DF, Bush R, et al. Is Nature relatedness associated with better mental and physical health? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071371
- Fong KC, Hart JE, James P. A review of epidemiologic studies on greenness and health: updated literature through 2017. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018;5(1):77–87. doi: 10.1007/s40572-018-0179-y
- Freymueller J, Schmid HL, Senkler B, et al. Current methodologies of greenspace exposure and mental health research-a scoping review. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1360134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1360134
- Ghosh V, Alee R. Nature heals: the relationship of nature-connectedness with subjective happiness and resilience. International Journal of Indian Psychology. 2023;11(2):334–344. doi: 10.25215/1102.034
- Koivisto M., Grassini S. Mental imagery of nature induces positive psychological effects. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(1):30348–30363. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04088-6
- Razumnikova ОМ, Varnavskyi IN. Differences in emotional relations to viewing films with natural and urban content in older and younger adults. Valeologiya. 2017:(4)55–62. doi: 10.18522/2218-2268-2017-4-55-61 EDN: YPQFNO
- Davidov A, Razumnikova O, Bakaev M. Nature in the heart and mind of the beholder: psycho-emotional and eeg differences in perception of virtual nature due to gender. Vision (Basel). 2023;7(2):30. doi: 10.3390/vision7020030
- Di Fabio A, Rosen MA. Accounting for individual differences in connectedness to nature: Personality and gender differences. Sustainability. 2019;11(6):1693. doi: 10.3390/su11061693
- Fernández Núñez MB, Campos Suzman L, Maneja R, et al. The differences by sex and gender in the relationship between urban greenness and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review. J Urban Health. 2022;99(6):1054–1067. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00685-9
- Gaekwad JS, Sal Moslehian A, Roös PB, Walker A. A meta-analysis of emotional evidence for the biophilia hypothesis and implications for biophilic design. Front Psychol. 2022;13:750245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750245
- Hazlehurst MF, Hajat A, Tandon PS, et al. Associations of residential green space with internalizing and externalizing behavior in early childhood. Environ Health. 2024;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01051-9
- Imperatori C, Massullo C, De Rossi E, et al. Exposure to nature is associated with decreased functional connectivity within the distress network: A resting state EEG study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1171215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1171215
- Mavros P, J Wälti M, Nazemi M, et al. A mobile EEG study on the psychophysiological effects of walking and crowding in indoor and outdoor urban environments. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):18476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20649-y
- Naghibi M, Farrokhi A, Faizi M. Small urban green spaces: insights into perception, preference, and psychological well-being in a densely populated areas of Tehran, Iran. Environ Health Insights. 2024;18:11786302241248314. doi: 10.1177/11786302241248314
- Chang CY, Hammitt WE, Chen PK, et al. Psychophysiological responses and restorative values of natural environments in Taiwan. Landsc Urban Plan. 2008;85(2):79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.010
- Grassini S, Segurini GV, Koivisto M. Watching nature videos promotes physiological restoration: evidence from the modulation of alpha waves in electroencephalography. Front Psychol. 2022;13:871143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871143
- Sahni P, Kumar J. Effect of nature experience on fronto-parietal correlates of neurocognitive processes involved in directed attention: an ERP study. Ann Neurosci. 2020;27(3-4):136–147. doi: 10.1177/0972753121990143
- Imperatori C, Massullo C, De Rossi E, et al. Exposure to nature is associated with decreased functional connectivity within the distress network: a resting state EEG study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1171215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1171215
- Clayton S, Irkhin BD, Nartova-Bochaver SK. Enviromental identity in Russia: validation and relationship to the concern for people and plants. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019;16(1):85–107. doi: 10.17323/1813-8918-2019-1-85-107
- Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994;25(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
- Lacey MF, Gable PA. Frontal asymmetry as a neural correlate of motivational conflict. Symmetry. 2022;14(3):507. doi: 10.3390/sym14030507
- Palmiero M, Piccardi L. Frontal EEG asymmetry of mood: a mini-review. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11:224. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00224
- Coan JA, Allen JJB. The state and trait nature of frontal EEG asymmetry in emotion. In: The asymmetrical brain Boston Review. The MIT Press; 2002. P. 565–615. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1463.003.0023
- Ito M., Takahashi T., Kurihara Y., Osu R. The effect of evaluating self’s emotions on frontal alpha asymmetry. bioRxiv. 2023. Ar. 535188. doi: 10.1101/2023.04.02.535188
- Mishra S, Srinivasan N, Tiwary US. Dynamic functional connectivity of emotion processing in beta band with naturalistic emotion stimuli. Brain Sci. 2022;12(8):1106. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081106
- Geng H, Xu P, Aleman A, et al. Dynamic organization of large-scale functional brain networks supports interactions between emotion and executive control. Neurosci Bull. 2024;40(7):981–991. doi: 10.1007/s12264-023-01168-w
- Hao Y, Yao L, Evans GW. Neural responses during emotion transitions and emotion regulation. Front Psychol. 2021;12:666284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666284
Supplementary files
