Cross-sectional study to measure health literacy among the population over 18 years old in selected regions of the Russian Federation: relevance and study design

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health literacy (HL) is a key factor that determines the effectiveness of decisions made by people with regard to a healthy lifestyle, prevention, and treatment of diseases. In addition, high-quality, updated, and comparable data are required to comprehensively understand the overall situation and identify specific areas for intervention. Therefore, the WHO suggests the regular measurement of HL in accordance with the WHO Action Network on Measuring Population and Organizational Health Literacy.

AIM: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive system for measuring HL in the prevention and treatment of noncommunicable diseases and in health promotion among the population aged 18 and older.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The questionnaire HLS19-Q-22-RU_Russian on measuring HL, which was adapted for the Russian population, was used to ensure the reliability and comparability of the data at the international level. Internal consistency and reliability of the questionnaire were studied using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Participants of the study aged 18 years and older in three regions of the Russian Federation were selected using multistage random sampling. The population survey was conducted through personal interviews in households from November to December 2019.

Health literacy levels were formed by calculating the sum of dichotomous elements, which were standardized in the range of 0 to 100. Cut-off points of 50.0–66.6–83.3 were used as threshold values for determining HL levels. The resulting HL levels were labeled as “inadequate,” “problematic,” “sufficient,” and “excellent.”

RESULTS: Based on the HLS19 international research standards for measuring HL, the design of the first population study in Russia was developed, which included five stages: adaptation of the questionnaire, sampling procedure, training of interviewers and supervisors, conducting a population study, and data analysis. The assessment of the internal consistency and reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach’s alpha showed a high α value for the Russian questionnaire (α=0.9). Consequently, an international methodology for measuring HL, adapted for the Russian population, was applied.

CONCLUSION: The findings can be used by researchers, disease prevention, public health promotion, and decision-makers when selecting methods for comprehensive measurements of adult HL at the population level.

About the authors

Maria V. Lopatina

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Author for correspondence.
Email: ms.lopatina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6572-0592
SPIN-code: 3982-0150

MD, Researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

Marina V. Popovich

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Email: MPopovich@gnicpm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2594-3446
SPIN-code: 8255-0059

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Marina L. Fomicheva

Regional Center for Public Health and Medical Prevention of the Novosibirsk Region

Email: mfomicheva@mznso.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2833-534X
SPIN-code: 5911-4952

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

Zukhra R. Ziganshina

Kazan Federal University; Kazan State Medical University

Email: zr_ziganshina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5826-6309
SPIN-code: 8552-0679
Scopus Author ID: 627389

Cand. Sci. (Econ.)

Russian Federation, Kazan; Kazan

Natalya N. Prischepa

Center for Public Health and Medical Prevention of the Republic of Karelia

Email: Natprishhepa@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

Anna V. Kontsevaya

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Email: AKontsevaya@gnicpm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2062-1536
Scopus Author ID: 241921

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Oxana M. Drapkina

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Email: odrapkina@gnicpm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4453-8430
SPIN-code: 4456-1297

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Kickbusch I, Pelikan JM, Apfel F, Tsouros AD. Health literacy: The solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2013. Available at: www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/.../e96854.pdf (assessed: 08.11.2021).
  2. Shanghai Declaration on promoting health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016. Available at: https://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/9gchp/shanghai-declaration/en/ (assessed: 08.11.2021).
  3. Sørensen K, Pean JM, Röthlin F, et al. Health literacy in Europe: Comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). European Journal of Public Health. 2015;25(6):1053-1058. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv043
  4. Doyle G, Cafferkey K, Fullam J. The European Health Literacy Survey: Results from Ireland, Dublin. The European Journal of Public Health. 2012;22:46.
  5. Duong VT, Aringazina A, Baisunova G, et al. Measuring health literacy in Asia: Validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asian countries’. Journal of Epidemiology. 2017;27(2):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.09.005
  6. Levin-Zamir D, Baron-Epel OB, Cohen V, Elhayany A. The association of health literacy with health behavior, socioeconomic indicators, and self-assessed health from a national adult survey in Israel. Journal of Health Communication. 2016;21(2):61-68. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1207115
  7. Van der Heide I, Wang J, Droomers M, et al. The relationship between health, education, and health literacy: Results from the Dutch Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey. Journal of Health Communication. 2013;18(1):172-184. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.825668
  8. Berens EV, Vogt D, Messer M, et al. Health literacy among different age groups in Germany: Results of a crosssectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1151. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3810-6
  9. Duong VT, Lin IF, Sørensen K, et al. Health literacy in Taiwan: A population-based study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2015;27(8):871-880. doi: 10.1177/1010539515607962
  10. Nakayama K, Osaka W, Togari T, et al. Comprehensive health literacy in Japan is lower than in Europe: A validated Japanese-language assessment of health literacy. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1835-x
  11. Friis K, Lasgaard M, Rowlands G, et al. Health Literacy Mediates the Relationship Between Educational Attainment and Health Behavior: A Danish Population-Based Study. Journal of Health Communication. 2016;21(2):54-60. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1201175
  12. Paasche-Orlow MK. The causal pathways linking health literacy with health outcomes. American Journal of Health Behavior. 2007;31:19-26. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S19
  13. Vandenbosch J, Van den Broucke S, Vancorenland S, et al. Health literacy and the use of healthcare services in Belgium. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2016;70(10):1032-1038. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206910
  14. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of Health Literacy. Social Science and Medicine. 2008;67(12):2072-2078. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050
  15. POHL. Network Concept Note, WHO Action Network on Measuring Population and Organizational Health Literacy within the European Health Information Initiative. Vienna: M-POHL, 2018. Available at: https://m-pohl.net (assessed: 08.11.2021)
  16. Pelikan JM, Ganahl K, Roethlin F. Health literacy as a determinant, mediator and/or moderator of health: empirical models using the European Health Literacy Survey dataset. Global Health Promotion. 2018;25(4):57-66. doi: 10.1177/1757975918788300
  17. Lopatina MV, Popovich MV, Karamnova NS, et al. Measuring functional health literacy in the adult population: a review of methods and the assessment of the applicability of the Newest Vital Sign test for the Russian population. Profilakticheskaya Medicina [Preventive Medicine]. 2020;23(6):Issue 2:126-134. [In Russ]. doi: 10.17116/profmed202023062126
  18. Lopatina MV, Popovich MV, Kontsevaya AV, Drapkina OM. Adaptation of the health literacy HLS19 questionnaire for the Russian population. Ekologiya Cheloveka [Human Ecology]. 2021;1:57-64. [In Russ] doi: 10.33396/1728-0869-2021-1-57-64
  19. Kish L. A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. Journal of the American statistical association. 1949;247:380–387. doi: 10.2307/2280236
  20. Balanova YuA, Imaeva AE, Kontsevaya AV, et al. Epidemiological monitoring of risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases in practical health care at the regional level. Methodical recommendations edited by S.A. Boytsov. M., 2016. Available at: http://www.gnicpm.ru (assessed: 08.11.2021).
  21. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, et al. Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  22. Pelikan JM, Nowak P, Bobek J. A methodology for monitoring population health literacy in Europe — the HLS19 project. European Journal of Public Health. 2019;29(4):185-233. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.233
  23. Taber K. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  24. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). 2011. Available at: http://uis.unesco.org (assessed: 08.11.2021).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Study Design.

Download (191KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Lopatina M.V., Popovich M.V., Fomicheva M.L., Ziganshina Z.R., Prischepa N.N., Kontsevaya A.V., Drapkina O.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies