Students' perceptions of well-being

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In today's society, there is a need to explore strategies for attaining and improving overall well-being. This exploration requires an examination of perceptions of well-being in different social groups. First and second-year students in higher education institutions represent the future social capital of the nation. Understanding the factors that contribute to their sense of well-being is essential, as it can determine their future social interactions and behaviors.

AIM: to identify the content of students’ perceptions of well-being.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 258 first- and second-year university students. The main research method was a modified free association technique, where students were asked to provide three associations in the form of verbs, adjectives, and nouns, resulting in a total of nine associations per participant. Data were analyzed using frequency analysis and calculation of ranks.

RESULTS: A total of 2322 associations were identified among students. These associations were then organized to form 51 associative groups, which were further combined into 16 semantic groups for meaningful interpretation. The concept of "well-being" was analyzed within a structured semantic space, focusing on emotional and motivational-need characteristics. The semantic space of the concept of “well-being” is structured according to emotional and motivational-need characteristics. The emotional component of well-being encompasses a range of positive emotions with varying degrees of intensity. On the other hand, the motivational-need component primarily addressed needs related to physical comfort, safety, basic life support, and material support.

CONCLUSION: In the content of university students’ perceptions about well-being, the emotional sphere holds the most significant position. Students associate well-being with feelings of calm joy, happiness and emotional stability. Additionally, perceptions of well-being are centered around fulfilling basic and material needs.

About the authors

Inna V. Vasileva

University of Tyumen; Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation

Email: i.v.vasileva@utmn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0740-7260
SPIN-code: 8706-1517

Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, 5 passage on May 9th, Tyumen, 625007; Tyumen

Mikhail V. Chumakov

Kurgan State University;Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Email: mihailchv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4381-5133
SPIN-code: 2121-9058

Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Kurgan; Ekaterinburg

Darya M. Chumakova

Kurgan State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ch-darya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8763-0106
SPIN-code: 6521-4070

Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Kurgan

References

  1. Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 well-being index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–176. doi: 10.1159/000376585
  2. Ryff CD, Singer BH. Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2008;9:13–39. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
  3. Friedman HS, Kern ML. Personality, well-being, and health. Annual review of psychology. 2014;65:719–742. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123
  4. Diener E, Wirtz D, Biswas-Diener R, et al. New measures of well-being. Assessing well-being: Social Indicators Research Series. 2009;39:247–266. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_12
  5. Vasileva IV, Chumakov MV. Dynamics of subjective student wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2022;29(9):643–651. EDN: KYWACP doi: 10.17816/humeco106980
  6. Bradburn N. The Structure of Psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.; 1969.
  7. Sokolova MV. Scale of subjective well-being. Yaroslavl: NPTs «Psikhodiagnostika»; 1996; (In Russ.)
  8. Ryff CD, Keyes CLM. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69(4):719–727. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
  9. Leontiev DA. Happiness and well-being: toward the construction of the conceptual field. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2020;(1):14–37. EDN: TBBDGH doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.02
  10. Kelly G. The Psychology of Personal Constructs: Volume One: Theory and Personality. London: Routledge; 1991. doi: 10.4324/9780203405970
  11. Arestova ON, Mitina OV, Chucarin BA. The level of emotional well-being and the structure of the hierarchy of personal values. Voprosy Psychologii. 2021;(3):85–93. EDN DJQEEY
  12. Chemerskoy GS, Tyulyupo SV, Dashieva BA. Settlement location and school size as determinants of subjective well-being and behavioral attitudes among adolescents. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2023;30(6):439–456. EDN: GLFHIM doi: 10.17816/humeco501763
  13. Vasileva IV, Chumakov MV, Chumakova DM, Bulatova OV. Subjective well-being of psychological-pedagogical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Science Journal. 2021;23(10):129–154. EDN: ZGSBZJ doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-10-129-154
  14. Vorozheikin SA. Concepts of happiness as predictors of subjective well-being of cadets of the troops of the national guard of the Russian Federation. Problems of Modern Education. 2023;(2):90–104. EDN: WLEMRY doi: 10.31862/2218-8711-2023-2-90-104
  15. Vorozheikin SA. Theoretical approaches to the study of the subjective well-being phenomenon. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology. 2022;11(4):316–327. EDN: UKZQCJ doi: 10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-4-316-327
  16. Ermakova ES. Creativity, self-actualization and subjective well-being of students. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. 2023;(2):169–186. EDN: GYRPWO doi: 10.35231/18186653_2023_2_169
  17. Abdullaeva MM, Titova MA, Emelin VA, Pechkovskaya EM. Vector model of professional identity development in modern specialists with different levels of psychological well-being in the context of digitalization in professional environments. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. 2023;46(4):11–35. EDN: CSPSCG doi: 10.11621/LPJ-23-37
  18. Dekhtiarenko AA, Shliagina EI, Gusev AN. Predictors of psychological well-being. Voprosy Psychologii. 2022;68(2):135–146. EDN XAMNT
  19. Vasilieva IV, Chumakov MV. Subjective well-being of students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2023;(3):113–120. EDN: HNPLUU doi: 10.20323/1813-145X_2023_3_132_113
  20. Chumakov MV, Vasilieva IV. The relationship between the sense of security, self-organization and subjective well-being of students in a pandemic. In: Current problems of extreme and crisis psychology. Materials of the III All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House, 2021. P. 126–128. (In Russ.) EDN: GRAFZC
  21. Belinskaya EP, Shaekhov ZD. Psychological well-being and adaptation to the risks of digital world at a young age. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. 2023;46(3):239–260. EDN: FKJOXF doi: 10.10.11621/LPJ-23-35
  22. Gordeyeva TO, Sychyov OA, Osin EN. Inner and outer motivation in students: its sources and influence on psychological well-being. Voprosy Psychologii. 2013;(1):35a–45. EDN: RVVJID
  23. Samokhvalova AG, Shipova NS, Tikhomirova EV, Vishnevskaya ON. Psychological well-being of modern students: typology and targets of psychological help. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2022;30(1):29–48. EDN: FSYQKQ doi: 10.17759/cpp.2022300103
  24. Samokhvalova AG, Tikhomirova EV, Vishnevskaya ON, et al. The structural-functional model of contemporary students' psychological well-being. Russian Psychological Journal. 2021;18(4):47–63. EDN: QKFDLX doi: 10.21702/rpj.2021.4.4
  25. Rubinshtein SL. Problems of General Psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1973 (In Russ.) EDN: YXELJU
  26. Kharkova OA, Kholmatova KK, Kuznetsov VN, et al. Qualitative research in medicine and public health. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2016;23(12):54–59. EDN: XCTCFX doi: 10.33396/1728-0869-2016-12-54-59
  27. Dotsenko EL, Vakhitova ZZ. Psychosemantics. Tyumen: Tyumen State University; 2014. (In Russ.) EDN: SAONCH
  28. Busygina NP. Qualitative research in psychology as a challenge to classical methodologies. In: Paradigms in psychology: scientific analysis. Ed. by AL Zhuravlev, TV Kornilova, AV Yurevich. Moscow: Publishing house "Institute of Psychology RAS"; 2012. P. 308–334. (In Russ.) EDN: SLICSR
  29. Pyatnitskiy NYu. Qualitative research using content analysis and OpenCode. Mental Health. 2018;16(11):81–87. EDN YORWLZ
  30. He Q, Tong H, Liu J-B. How does inequality affect the residents' subjective well-being: inequality of opportunity and inequality of effort. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:843854.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.843854
  31. Arrondo R, Cárcaba A, González E. Drivers of subjective well-being under different economic scenarios. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:696184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696184
  32. Malyshev KB, Malysheva OA. Psychological well-being of the individual. Actual Problems of Pedagogy and Psychology. 2021;2(8):50–62. EDN: IBMSPX
  33. Shamionov RM. Subjective well-being of personality: a psychological pattern and factors. Saratov: Nauchnaja kniga; 2008. (In Russ.) EDN: PXNNMN

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Supplement 1. The most common associations across the entire sample
Download (11KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Supplement 2. Distribution of the most frequently occurring associations for the word «well-being» across semantic groups
Download (12KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies