Email this article ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION SYNDROME AND RESULTS OF OPEN AND ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF INFRARENAL ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM
- Authors: Karpenko AA1, Dyussupov A.A2, Shilova AN1, Dyussupov AZ2, Dyussupov A.A2, Dyussupova AA2, Sabitov ET2, Grjibovski AM3,4,5
-
Affiliations:
- Novosibirsk Institute of Circulation Pathology name after E. N. Meshalkin
- Semey State Medical University
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- 4Northern State Medical University
- 5International Kazakh-Turkish University
- Issue: Vol 22, No 11 (2015)
- Pages: 25-32
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1728-0869/article/view/16971
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco16971
- ID: 16971
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In the period from March 2013 to May 2014, in order to study the syndrome of ischemia-reperfusion and immediate treatment results, a prospective non-randomized clinical study of 43 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was realized. The patients, depending on the method of treatment, divided into 2 groups: 26 patients with open repair (OR) and 17 patients with endovascular repair (EVAR). The main criteria for inclusion into the study were AAA of II and III type by A. V. Pokrovsky and elective repair of the AAA. As markers of ischemia-reperfusion C-reactive protein, proinflammatory cytokine IL-6, anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and oxidative status were investigated. The level of ischemic inflammation and reperfusion markers in patients with OR was generally higher than in patients with EVAR, and the level of IL-6 excess was statistically significant (p = 0.001). The longer the time compression of the abdominal aorta in the OR the higher the level of markers of ischemia-reperfusion. In patients with a time compression of the abdominal aorta more than 30 minutes there was a significant excess of IL-6 before removing the clamp from the abdominal aorta (p = 0.035) and after the start of the magistral blood flow to both lower extremities (p = 0.050), as well as significant excess of indicator of oxidative status of the blood Oxystat before removing the clamp from the abdominal aorta, after the launch of the main blood flow to the feet and 30 minutes after the end of surgery (p = 0.001). The number of local and systemic complications at the early postoperative period was significantly higher in patients undergoing OR (p = 0.002), which for this indicator shows the benefits of EVAR.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A A Karpenko
Novosibirsk Institute of Circulation Pathology name after E. N. MeshalkinNovosibirsk, Russia
Alt A Dyussupov
Semey State Medical University
Email: altay-doc77@mail.ru
кандидат медицинских наук, проректор по научной и клинической работе; сосудистый хирург высшей категории Kazakhstan
A N Shilova
Novosibirsk Institute of Circulation Pathology name after E. N. MeshalkinNovosibirsk, Russia
A Z Dyussupov
Semey State Medical UniversityKazakhstan
Alm A Dyussupov
Semey State Medical UniversityKazakhstan
A A Dyussupova
Semey State Medical UniversityKazakhstan
E T Sabitov
Semey State Medical UniversityKazakhstan
A M Grjibovski
Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 4Northern State Medical University; 5International Kazakh-Turkish UniversityOslo, Norway; Arkhangelsk, Russia; Turkestan, Kazakhstan
References
- Aivatidi C., Vourliotakis G., Georgopoulas S. et al. Oxidative stress during abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - biomarkers and antioxidant's protective effect: a review. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2011; 15: 245-252.
- Blum U., Voshage G., Lammer J., Beyersdorf F., Töllner D. et al. Endoluminal stent-grafts for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 13-20.
- Collard C. D., Gelman S. Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Prevention of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Anesthesiology. 2001; 94: 1 133-8
- Gelman S. The Pathophysiology of Aortic Cross-clamping and Unclamping. Anesthesiology. 1995; 82(4): 1026-57.
- Huang Y., Gloviczki P., Oderich G. S., et al. Outcome after open and endovascular repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysms in matched cohorts using propensity score modeling. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2015; 62: 304-311.
- Kahn R. A., Moskowitz D. M., Manspeizer H. E., et al. Endovascular aortic repair is associated with greater hemodynamic stability compared with open aortic reconstruction. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999; 13: 42-6.
- Kong S. E., Blennerhassett L. R., Heel K. A., et al. Ischemia-reperfusion injury to the intestine. Australia New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 1998; 68: 554-61
- Malick I. H., Yang W, Winslet M. C., Seifalian A. M. Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury of the Intestine and Protective Strategies Against Injury. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2004; 49(9): 1359-77.
- Marks V. еt al. Differential diagnosis by laboratory medicine. 2002. Springer Verlag. P. 234-240.
- Maxwell S. R., Lip G. Y. Reperfusion injury: A review of the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and therapeutic options. International Journal of Cardiology. 1997; 58: 95-117.
- May J., White G. H., Yu W., et al. Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life table method. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 213-21.
- Moll F. L., Powell J. T., Fraedrich G. with co-authors. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for vascular surgery. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery. 2011; 41: 1-58.
- Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. 2002; 360: 1531-9.
- Romson J. L., Hook B. G., Kunkel S. L., et al. Reduction of the extent of ischemic myocardial injury by neutrophil depletion in the dog. Circulation. 1983; 67: 1016-23
- Russell R. C., Roth A. C., Kucan J. O., Zook E. G. Reperfusion injury and oxygen free radicals: a review. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 1989; 5: 79-84.
- Singh K., Bonaa K. H., Jacobsen B. K., Bjork L., Solberg S. Prevalence and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population-based study: the Tromsq Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154: 236-44.
- Swartbol P., Norgren L., Albrechtsson U., et al. Biological responses differ considerably between endovascular and conventional aortic aneurysm surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996; 12: 18-25.
- Treharne G. D., Thompson M. M., Whiteley M. W, Bell P. R., Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair reduces mortality: a physiological analysis. Br J Surg. 1999; 86: 697.
- Walker T. G., Kalva S. P., Yeddula K. et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Written by the Standards of Practice Committee for the Society of Interventional Radiology and Endorsed by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2010; 21: 1632-55.
- Winquist R. J., Kerr S. Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury and adhesion. Neurology. 1997; 49: 23-6
- Woodburn K. R., May J., White G. H. Endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg. 1998; 85: 435-43.
