Variants of facial nerve neurotization

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This study presents facial nerve neurotization, a common method of surgical treatment of facial muscle paralysis. In this surgical procedure, a trunk or some portions of individual fibers are sewn to an intact nerve-neurotizator to the injured facial nerve that can act as sublingual, masseteric, phrenic, accessory, glossopharyngeal nerves, as well as the descending branch of the sublingual nerve and anterior branches of the C2–C3 cervical spinal nerves. Often, neurosurgeons combine various donor nerves and autotransplanting inserts for better results. The main stages of neurotization of the facial nerve includes isolation and transection of the facial nerve, isolation and transection of the trunk or separate fibers of the neurotizer, and nerve suturing in an “end-to-end” or “end-to-side” fashion. Facial cross-plasty, the most innovative method of facial nerve neurotization, should be carefully performed, during which an anastomosis is performed between the damaged and intact facial nerves using autotransplantation inserts from the calf nerve or from a free muscle graft, including a tender muscle and an anterior branch of the locking nerve. Recovery of facial nerve function and regression of characteristic symptoms takes time and specialized recovery treatment. Generally, among the lesions of the cranial nerves, injuries and diseases of the facial nerve rank first and are one of the most common pathologies of the peripheral nervous system. The clinical picture of facial nerve injuries in various origins is quite monotonous and manifested by persistent paralysis or paresis of the facial muscles. Various highly effective techniques are aimed at restoring the function of the facial nerve and facial muscles. Many conservative and operative methods of treating facial nerve neuropathy have been presented in the modern medical literature. However, all methods of facial nerve neurotization have several disadvantages, and the leading ones are the inability to achieve 100% efficiency and development of one degree or another neurological deficit.

About the authors

Alexey I. Gaivoronsky

Military medical academy of S.M. Kirov; Saint Petersburg State University

Email: don-gaivoronsky@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1886-5486

doctor of medical sciences, professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Bogdan V. Skaliitchouk

Military medical academy of S.M. Kirov

Author for correspondence.
Email: bogdan_skaliitchouk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6024-8142
SPIN-code: 5453-1036

cadet

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vyacheslav V. Vinogradov

Military medical academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: ulytreack@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5930-3805

cadet

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitriy E. Alekseev

Military medical academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: dealekseev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8685-3965

candidate of medical sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitriy V. Svistov

Military medical academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: dvsvistov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3922-9887

candidate of medical sciences, docent

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Danny J, Revenaugh PC. Facial reanimation: an update on nerve transfers in facial paralysis. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2019;27(4):231–236. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000543
  2. May M, Schaitkin BM. Facial Paralysis Rehabilitation Techniques. NY: Thieme, 2003. 289 p.
  3. Tsymbaliuk IaV, Tsymbaliuk VI, Tretyak IB, et al. Comparative Analysis of Various Types of Neurotization as a Method of Surgical Treatment of Peripheral Facial Paresis. Novosti Khirurgii. 2020;28(3):299–308. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18484/2305-0047.2020.3.299
  4. Gaivoronsky IV, Madaj OD, Gaivoronskaya MG, Kirillova MP. The possibility of assessing the midface morphometric parameters according to x-ray methods. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2019;21(1):171–174. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/brmma25916
  5. Hohman MH, Hadlock TA. Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Facial Palsy: 2000 Patients at a Facial Nerve Center. The Laryngoscope. 2014;124(7):283–293. doi: 10.1002/lary.24542
  6. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg. 1985;93(2):146–147. doi: 10.1177/019459988509300202
  7. May M, Sobol SM, Mester SJ. Hypoglossal-facial nerve interpositional-jump graft for facial reanimation without tongue atrophy. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery. 1991;104(6): 818–825. doi: 10.1177/019459989110400609
  8. Shurgaya TsM. Khirurgicheskii algoritm lecheniya bol’nykh s litsevymi paralichami [dissertation]. Moscow, 1996. 35 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Grebenyuk VI, Chuprina YuV. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie paralichei litsevykh myshts. Leningrad: Meditsina; 1964. 155 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Nerobeev AI, Dydykin SS, Omerelli ER, et al. Mylohyoid nerve as a donor for facial nerve restoration. A topographic-anatomical study. Part I. Annaly plasticheskoi, rekonstruktivnoi i ehsteticheskoi khirurgii. 2011;(3):17–23. (In Russ.).
  11. Goven’ko FS. Khirurgiya povrezhdeniya perifericheskikh nervov. Saint-Petersburg: Feniks; 2010. 384 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Pol’shina VI. Reinnervatsiya mimicheskikh myshts s ispol’zovaniem zhevatel’nogo nerva [dissertation]. Moscow; 2016. 130 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Zotov AV, Rzayev DA, Dmitriev AB, et al. Evaluation of short-term surgical outcomes in facial paralysis patients treated by trigeminal neurotization. Burdenko’s journal of neurosurgery. 2016;80(4):31–39. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/neiro201680431-39
  14. Matos Cruz AJ, De Jesus O. Facial Nerve Repair. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
  15. Sánchez-Ocando M, Gavilán J, Penarrocha J, et al. Facial nerve repair: the impact of technical variations on the final outcome. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2019;276(12): 3301–3308. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05638-8
  16. Amer TA, El Kholy MS. The split hypoglossal nerve versus the cross-face nerve graft to supply the free functional muscle transfer for facial reanimation: A comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(5):750–757. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.01.008
  17. Nechaeva AS, Ulitin AYu, Pustovoy SV, Tastanbekov MM. Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis for management of facial palsy. Rossiiskii neirokhirurgicheskii zhurnal imeni professora A.L. Polenova. 2019;11(3):32–37. (In Russ.).
  18. Cusimano MD, Sekhar L. Partial Hypoglossal to Facial Nerve Anastomosis for Reinnervation of the Paralyzed Face in Patients with Lower Cranial Nerve Palsies. Neurosurgery. 1994;35(3):532–533. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199409000-00027
  19. Darrouzet V, Guerin J, Bebear JP. New technique of side-to-end hypoglossal–facial nerve attachment with translocation of the infratemporal facial nerve. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(1):27–34. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0027
  20. Samii M, Alimohamadi M, Khouzani RK, et al. Comparison of Direct Side-to-End and End-to-End Hypoglossal-Facial Anastomosis for Facial Nerve Repair. World Neurosurgery. 2015;84(2):368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.029
  21. Sultanekh AM. Plastika litsevogo nerva stvolom pod’yazychnogo nerva s reinnervatsiei pod’yazychnogo nerva ego niskhodyashchei vetv’yu [dissertation]. Moscow; 1994. 16 p. (In Russ.).
  22. Gao Z, Jia X, Xu J, et al. Neurorrhaphy for Facial Reanimation with Interpositional Graft: Outcome in 23 Patients and the Impact of Timing on the Outcome. World Neurosurgery. 2019;126:e688–e693. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.124
  23. Spira M. Anastomosis of masseteric nerve to lower division of facial nerve for correction of lower facial parlysis. Preliminary Report. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1978;61(3):330–334. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197803000-00004
  24. Boahene K. Reanimating the paralyzed face. F1000Prime Reports. 2013;5:49. doi: 10.12703/p5-49
  25. Fournier H-D, Denis F, Papon X, et al. An anatomical study of the motor distribution of the mandibular nerve for a masseteric-facial anastomosis to restore facial function. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 1997;19(4):241–244. doi: 10.1007/bf01627866
  26. Gayvoronsky IV, Rodionov AA, Gayvoronskaya MG, et al. Role of chewing muscles and temporomandibular joint in the realization of mandibula buttress function. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2017;19(4):158–163. (In Russ.).
  27. Biglioli F, Colombo V, Rabbiosi D, et al. Masseteric–facial nerve neurorrhaphy: results of a case series. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(1): 312–318. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.jns14601
  28. Hontanilla B, Marré D. Comparison of Hemihypoglossal Nerve versus Masseteric Nerve Transpositions in the Rehabilitation of Short-Term Facial Paralysis Using the Facial Clima Evaluating System. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2012;130(5):662e–672e. doi: 10.1097/prs.0b013e318267d5e8
  29. Harii K, Ohmori K, Torii S, et al. Free gracilis muscle transplantation, with microneurovascular anastomoses for the treatment of facial paralysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1976;57(2):133–143. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197602000-00001
  30. Viterbo F. Secondary procedures in facial reanimation. Reoperative aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Missouri; 2007. P. 859–879.
  31. Kim MJ, Kim HB, Jeong WS, et al. Comparative Study of 2 Different Innervation Techniques in Facial Reanimation. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2019;84(2):188–195. doi: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002034

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Neurotization of the facial nerve by the sublingual approach according to M. May, S.M. Sobol, S.J. Mester (1991)

Download (394KB)
3. Fig. 2. Neurotization of the facial nerve by chewing according to M. Spira (1978)

Download (143KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Gaivoronsky A.I., Skaliitchouk B.V., Vinogradov V.V., Alekseev D.E., Svistov D.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies