Impact of combat conditions on casualties and surgical care

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern armed conflicts evolve rapidly, resulting in changes in combat scenarios, tactical settings, and military medicine. This, in turn, influences the prevalence of combat-related surgical injuries, with a significant effect on the scope and type of surgical care provided during the early stages of casualty evacuation. The medical evacuation support system established at the beginning of the military operation is currently facing new challenges. These include providing medical care throughout a lengthy prehospital phase as well as the need for specialty care and military medical examination for the increasing number of light casualties in the active army.

AIM: This work aimed to assess the prevalence of combat-related surgical injuries as well as the type and scope of surgical care in various combat scenarios of a modern regional conflict.

METHODS: Data on casualties that required surgical treatment were pooled and analyzed for several forward medical facilities of individual medical battalions, including those of reinforced combat teams, during a modern armed conflict.

RESULTS: Modern warfare is evolving rapidly, as evidenced by the fact that three-fourths of patients admitted to tertiary care were injured as a result of unmanned aerial vehicle attacks. Changes in combat conditions have significantly altered the prevalence of combat-related surgical injuries and the type of surgical care provided. The longer time to casualty evacuation for specialty surgical care is the most significant change influencing the current medical evacuation support system. Other changes, including the decreased proportion of severe and extremely severe wounds (by 15.4%), the increased proportion of minor wounds (by 49.9%), the decreased incidence of penetrating wounds (by 45.2%), and the increased incidence of isolated wounds (by 53.2%), facilitate secondary and tertiary casualty evacuation.

CONCLUSION: The changes discussed above are primarily associated with a longer time to casualty evacuation for specialty surgical care. These changes signify a new, significant challenge for tactical medicine during a lengthy prehospital phase. Specialized military hospitals for light casualties deployed in a combat area and its immediate vicinity have reduced the need for casualty evacuation to rear military medical facilities.

About the authors

Rustam R. Kasimov

Military Clinical Hospital No. 442; Military Medical Directorate of the Leningrad Military District

Author for correspondence.
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5866-8378
SPIN-code: 5682-2810

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Mukhamed A. Hezhev

Military Medical Directorate of the Leningrad Military District

Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-7863-6790
SPIN-code: 6313-0747

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Igor M. Samokhvalov

Kirov Military Medical Academy; Saint Petersburg I.I. Janelidze Ambulance Research Institute

Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1398-3467
SPIN-code: 4590-8088

Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Anatoliy A. Zavrazhnov

Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5889-5175
SPIN-code: 5328-5819

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey A. Kovalenko

Military Clinical Hospital No. 442

Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-3547-760X

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vadim A. Рrosvetov

Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5503-1598
SPIN-code: 1717-7735

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Samokhvalov IM, Kryukov EV, Markevich VY, et al. Military field surgery in 2031. Military Medical Journal. 2021;342(9):4–11. doi: 10.52424/00269050_2021_342_9_04 EDN: JWTNSB
  2. Kotenko PK, Pak RV, Golovinova VY. Organization of medical care and treatment rendered to slightly wounded during the armed conflicts of the late XX-early XXI centuries. In: 3rd Asia-pacific congress on military medicine: proceedings of the congress, Saint Petersburg, 08-12 August 2016. Saint Petersburg: Kirov Military Medical Academy; 2016. 28 p. EDN: YGBXPZ
  3. Blackbourne LH, Baer DG, Eastridge BJ, et al. Military medical revolution: prehospital combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):372–377. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182755662
  4. Zhukov AA, Guzeyev RN, Chuvashev ML. Separate medical battalions (medical detachments) in the medical support system of the troops (forces) of the special military operation. In: Collection of materials of the All-Army scientific-practical conference "Actual problems of medical support of troops (forces)". Saint Petersburg: Kirov Military Medical Academy; 2024. P. 28–38. EDN: UOWRIJ
  5. Ivchenko EV, Ovchinnikov DV. Main scientific and practical results of the study in the Military Medical Academy of combat pathology of the period of Special Military Operation. Russian Military Medical Academy Reports. 2024;43(4):457–469. doi: 10.17816/rmmar636549 EDN: BVPONC
  6. Kryukov EV, Golovko KP, Badalov VI, et al. Features of providing qualified surgical care in a modern armed conflict. Military Medical Journal. 2024;345(11):4–14. doi: 10.52424/00269050_2024_345_11_4 EDN: GJVPKT
  7. DeSoucy E, Shackelford S, Dubose J, et al. Review of 54 cases of prolonged field care. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(1):121–129. doi: 10.55460/OAL4-CBRC
  8. Garcia P, Rosen J, Kapoor Ch, et al. Trauma Pod: a semi-automated telerobotic surgical system. Int J Med Robotics. 2009;5(2):136–146. doi: 10.1002/rcs.238
  9. Pisarenko LV, Gumenyuk SA, Potapov VI. On the possibilities and significance of unmanned aerial vehicles for the pre-hospital stage of medical care. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal of Emergency Medical Care. 2024;13(3):501–513. doi: 10.23934/2223-9022-2024-13-3-501-513 EDN: FHOJQU
  10. Hanford Ch, Revees F, Parcer P. Prospective use of unmanned aerial vehicles for military medical evacuation in future conflicts. J R Army Med Corps. 2018;164(4):293–296. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2017-000890
  11. Taylor A, Corley J. Theater blood support in the prehospital setting. US Army Med Dep J. 2016;(2-16):43–47.
  12. Golovko KP. Features of surgical aid to the wounded in the area of military operations and ways of its improvement. [dissertation abstract]. Saint Petersburg; 2005. 20 p. (In Russ.) EDN: NHXZIX
  13. Samokhvalov IM, Kryukov EV, Markevich VY, et al. Twenty "beginnings" of N.I. Pirogov’s military field surgery, their relevance and development. Military Medical Journal. 2022;343(8):11–19. doi: 10.52424/00269050_2022_343_8_11 EDN: TSUCFL
  14. Samokhvalov IM. Delivery of surgical services for wounded in modern armed conflicts: surgical services at the different stages of medical evacuaton (report 1). Military Medical Journal. 2012;333(12):4–11. EDN: RPBIPD

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).