The preoperative and postoperative period when phalloendoprosthesis


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Аbstract. The recommendations on an integrated approach to the management of patients with penile prosthesis are presented. Penile prosthesis is one of the most effective and radical methods of erectile dysfunction treatment and is a common worldwide surgery, which gives a more predictable effect and allows to meet the expectations of 80-90% of patients and their partners. Currently, surgeons and urologists has quite a diverse choice of different models of phalloendoprosthesis and methodical surgical approaches for their installation. However, there are no clear clinical guidelines worldwide for the management of patients subjected to phalloendoprosthesis in the pre - and postoperative period. There is also no unified approach to the prevention of infectious complications of phalloendoprosthesis, including their preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, based on clinical studies. The authors describe and structure the information about preparation stages and management of patients in pre - and post-operative period to prevent the most common complications. All the developed algorithms are based on extremely small selection and purely descriptive statistics, therefore further studies are needed on the scientific basis of management of patients with penile prosthesis, which should be based on in-depth statistical analysis. We consider it necessary to develop legal acts of management for this category of patients, the creation of Russian clinical guidelines for the prevention of infections in surgical intervention in penile prosthesis.

About the authors

Yu D Udalov

Федеральный медико-биологический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна

Москва

P S Kyzlasov

Федеральный медико-биологический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна

Email: dr.kyzlasov@mail.ru
Москва

A G Martov

Федеральный медико-биологический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна

Москва

M V Zabelin

Федеральный медико-биологический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна

Москва

A A Kazhera

Федеральный медико-биологический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна

Москва

References

  1. Аполихин, О.И. Современная демографическая ситуация и проблемы улучшения репродуктивного здоровья населения России / О.И. Аполихин, Н.Г. Москалева, В.А. Комарова // Эксперимент. и клин. урология. - 2015. - № 4. - С. 8-14.
  2. Локшин, К.Л. Сравнительная характеристика силденафила и других ингибиторов фосфодиэстеразы 5-го типа в лечении больных с эректильной дисфункцией (обзор литературы) / К.Л. Локшин // Русс. мед. журн. - 2013. - № 18. - С. 936-939.
  3. Салахалдин, Р.Д. Эпидемиология эректильной дисфункции: автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. - Ростов н/Д, 2003. - 21 с.
  4. Урология: клинические рекомендации / под ред. Н. А. Лопат- кина. - 2-е изд. - М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013. - 416 с.
  5. Al Mohajer, M. Infections associated with inflatable penile prostheses / M. Al Mohajer, R.O. Darouiche // Sex. Med. Rev. - 2014. - Vol. 2. - Р. 134-140.
  6. Carson, C.C. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of penile prosthesis infection / C.C. Carson // Int. J. Impôt, Res. - 2003. - Vol. 15, № 5. - P. 139-146.
  7. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery. - ASHP, 2015. - 283 р.
  8. Chung, E. Penile prosthesis implantation for the treatment for male erectile dysfunction: clinical outcomes and lessons learnt after procedures / E. Chung [et al.] // World J. Urol. - 2013. - Vol. 31, № 3. - Р. 591-595.
  9. Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections provide recommendations for the care of patients before, during and after surgery / Global Guidelines, 2016. - 184 р.
  10. Grabe, M. Guidelines on Urological Infections / M. Grabe [et al.] // European Association of Urology. - 2015. - 85 р.
  11. Gross, E. Multicenter Investigation of the Micro-Organisms Involved in Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the AUA and EAU Guidelines for Penile Prosthesis Prophylaxis / E. Cross [et al.] // J. Sex. Med. - 2017. - Vol.14. - P. 455-463.
  12. Darouiche, R.O. North American Consensus Document on Infection of Penile Prostheses / R.O. Darouiche // Urology. - 2013. - Vol. 82, № 4. - P. 937-942.
  13. Minervini, А. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: exDe- rience with 504 procedures / А. Minervini, D.J. Ralf, J.P. Pryor // BJU. - 2006. - Vol. 97, № 1. - P. 129-133.
  14. Montague, D.K. Contemporary aspects of penile prosthesis implantation / D.K. Montague, K.W. Angermeier // Urol. int. ˗ 2003. - Vol. 70, № 2. - P. 141-146.
  15. Mulcahy, J.J. Current use of penile implants in erectile dysfunction / J.J. Mulcahy, S.K.Wilson // Curr. Urol. Rep. - 2006. - Vol. 7, № 6. - P. 485-489.
  16. Natali, A. Penile implantation in Europe; Successes and Complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany / A. Natali, R. lianas, M. Fisch // J. Sex. Med. - 2008. - Vol. 5, № 6. - P. 1503-1512.
  17. Pineda, M. Penile Prosthesis Infections-A Review of Risk Factors, Prevention, and Treatment / M. Pineda, A.L. Burnett // Sex Med Rev. - 2016. - Vol. 4, № 4. - P. 389-398.
  18. Wolf, J.S. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis / J.S. Wolf [et al.] // J Urol. - 2008. - Vol. 179, № 4. - P. 1379-1390.
  19. Wijson, S.K. Infection reduction using antibiotic- coated inflatable penile prosthesis / S.K. Wijson [et al.] // Urology. - 2007. - Vol. 70, № 2. - P. 337-340.
  20. Wilson, S.K. Biofilm and penile prosthesis infections in the era of coated implants: A review / S.K. Wilson [et al.] // J. Sex. Med. - 2012. - Vol. 9. - P. 44-53.

Copyright (c) 2018 Udalov Y.D., Kyzlasov P.S., Martov A.G., Zabelin M.V., Kazhera A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies