Doctors in the eyes of the relatives of stroke patients: mutual understanding and relationship


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relatives of the patients presenting with acute cerebral circulation problems (ACCP) and admitted to a neurological department can form the opinion about the quality of the doctor’s work only based on the patients’ health status without regard for the professional skills and dedication of a given specialist; this fact can be attributed, among other things, to stress (a total of 76 subjects were interviewed). At the same time, those understanding the specific character of the medical profession are capable of highly appreciating the quality of the doctor’s work even in the case of an unfavourable outcome of the treatment. All the respondents who participated in the present study emphasized the necessity of the efficient communication with the attending doctor that is in our opinion one of the most important conditions indispensable for the creation of the normal working environment and the reduction of the psychic tension. The authors discuss the possible ways of cooperation between the doctor and the patient’s family with the purpose of reducing stress on the relatives, improving the quality of care and rehabilitative measures after the patient’s discharge from the hospital, and preventing the loss of emotional sensitivity by the doctors.

About the authors

A. A Aidinov

Municipal budgetary healthcare facility “Azov Central City Hospital”

Oleg V. Kubryak

Federal state budgetary institution of science “P.K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology”

Email: o.kubryak@nphys.ru
Moscow

A. V Kholodny

Municipal budgetary healthcare facility “Azov Central City Hospital”

P. Yu Lekomtsev

Municipal budgetary healthcare facility “Azov Central City Hospital”

M. A Zubko

Municipal budgetary healthcare facility “Azov Central City Hospital”

Yu. V Plyasova

State budgetary healthcare facility “M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute”

Moscow

References

  1. Петров Р.В., Юдин Б.Г. Развитие биоэтики в России. Казанский медицинский журнал. 2008; 89(4): 387-94.
  2. Stempsey W.E. Philosophy of medicine is what philosophers of medicine do. Perspect. Biol. Med. 2008; 51(3): 379-91. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0021.
  3. Han B., Haley W.E. Family caregiving for patients with stroke. Review and analysis. Stroke. 1999; 30(7): 1478-85.
  4. Saban K.L., Sherwood P.R., DeVon H.A., Hynes D.M. Measures of psychological stress and physical health in family caregivers of stroke survivors: a literature review. J. Neurosci. Nurs. 2010; 42(3): 128-38.
  5. Camak D.J. Addressing the burden of stroke caregivers: a literature review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2015; 24(17-18): 2376-82. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12884.
  6. Lai D.W. Effect of financial costs on caregiving burden of family caregivers of older adults. Sage Open. 2012 doi: 10.1177/2158244012470467
  7. Veatch R.M. The Patient-Physician Relation: The Patient as Partner. Part 2. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1991.
  8. Nishimura K., Nakamura F., Takegami M., Fukuhara S., Nakagawara J., Ogasawara K. et al. Cross-sectional survey of workload and burnout among Japanese physicians working in stroke care: the nationwide survey of acute stroke care capacity for proper designation of comprehensive stroke center in Japan (J-ASPECT) study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2014; 7(3): 414-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000159.
  9. Кравченко С.А. К обоснованию гуманистической теории сложности общества. Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2013; 1((28): 180-4.
  10. Зарубина Н.Н. Упрощенные социальные практики как способ адаптации к сложному социуму. Социологические исследования. 2014; 5: 37-46.
  11. Кубряк О.В., Ермакова А.Н., Айдинов А.А. К проблематике постдипломного обучения и самообразования врачей в области медицинской реабилитации. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2015; 1(125): 91-8. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2015.1.07
  12. Ондрейкович П. Интерпретация и объяснения в исследованиях социологов. Социологические исследования. 2008; 12: 36-46.
  13. Рогозин Д.М. Когнитивный анализ опросного инструмента. М.: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение»; 2002.
  14. Сорокин П.А. Социальная и культурная динамика: Исследование изменений в больших системах искусства, истины, этики, права и общественных отношений. СПб.: Издательство Русского Христианского гуманитарного института; 2000.

Copyright (c) 2015 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies