SATELLITE GRAVIMETRY AS A TOOL FOR FORECASTING OIL AND GAS POTENTIAL

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This study explores the use of satellite gravity data and derived crustal models for predicting oil and gas potential in the east of the Russian platform. The research utilizes structural data (including GOCE satellite gravity-derived Moho depth), thermal data, and hydrocarbon potential data. The methodology involves three steps: 1) statistical analysis using Student's -test to identify significant parameters distinguishing areas with and without hydrocarbon fields; 2) classification of the study area into three zones based on their hydrocarbon potential; and 3) application of a logistic regression machine learning model to forecast hydrocarbon potential in uncertain areas. The results show that most analyzed parameters have statistically significant differences between areas with and without hydrocarbon fields. The logistic regression model achieves 83% accuracy in predicting hydrocarbon potential. The study concludes that satellite gravity data and derived crustal models can be effectively used to forecast oil and gas potential in sedimentary basins, with the Precaspian basin, Cis-Ural trough, parts of the Central-Russia and Mezen rift systems, and the Timan-Pechora basin identified as the most promising areas in the east of the Russian platform.

About the authors

I. Ognev

Kazan Federal University

Email: ognev.igor94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4155-9858
Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Scientific and educational center "TRIZ Modeling", candidate of geological and mineralogical sciences 2023

G. Khamidullina

Kazan Federal University

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2675-9077

D. Nourgaliev

Kazan (Volga) Federal University

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4269-0962
professor, doctor of geological and mineralogical sciences

F. Garaev

Kazan Federal University

ORCID iD: 0009-0006-2447-1423

D. Ikhsanova

Kazan Federal University

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8078-4022

D. Mulikova

Kazan Federal University

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3892-2284

References

  1. Artemieva I. M., Thybo H. EUNAseis: A seismic model for Moho and crustal structure in Europe, Greenland, and the North Atlantic region // Tectonophysics. — 2013. — Vol. 609. — P. 97–153. — doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.08.004.
  2. Artemieva I. M. Lithosphere structure in Europe from thermal isostasy // Earth-Science Reviews. — 2019. — Vol. 188. — P. 454–468. — doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.11.004.
  3. Avrov V. Y., Buyalov N. I., Vasiliev V. G. Map of oil and gas potential of the USSR as of January 1 1967. — Moscow : Main Directorate of Geodesy, Cartography, 1969. — (In Russian).
  4. Beardsmore G. R., Cull J. P. Crustal Heat Flow: A Guide to Measurement and Modelling. — Cambridge University Press, 2001. — doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511606021.
  5. Bouman J., Floberghagen R., Rummel R. More Than 50 Years of Progress in Satellite Gravimetry // Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. — 2013. — Vol. 94, no. 31. — P. 269–270. — doi: 10.1002/2013eo310001.
  6. Bouman J., Ebbing J., Meekes S., et al. GOCE gravity gradient data for lithospheric modeling // International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. — 2015. — Vol. 35. — P. 16–30. — doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2013.11.001.
  7. Constantino R. R., Hackspacher P. C., Souza I. A. de, et al. Basement structures over Rio Grande Rise from gravity inversion // Journal of South American Earth Sciences. — 2017. — Vol. 75. — P. 85–91. — doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2017.02.005.
  8. Förste C., König R., Bruinsma S., et al. On the principles of satellite-based Gravity Field Determination with special focus on the Satellite Laser Ranging technique // 20th International Workshop on Laser Ranging. — Potsdam : Helmholtz Centre, 2016.
  9. Fowler C. M. R. The Solid Earth: An Introduction to Global Geophysics (2nd ed.) — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  10. Haas P., Ebbing J., Szwillus W. Sensitivity analysis of gravity gradient inversion of the Moho depth—a case example for the Amazonian Craton // Geophysical Journal International. — 2020. — Vol. 221, no. 3. — P. 1896–1912. — doi: 10.1093/gji/ggaa122.
  11. Jennings S. S., Hasterok D., Lucazeau F. ThermoGlobe: Extending the global heat flow database // Journal TBD. — 2021.
  12. Nabighian M. N., Ander M. E., Grauch V. J. S., et al. Historical development of the gravity method in exploration // Geophysics. — 2005. — Vol. 70, no. 6. — P. 63–89. — doi: 10.1190/1.2133785.
  13. Ognev I., Ebbing J., Haas P. Crustal structure of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton revealed by inverse and forward gravity modelling // Solid Earth. — 2022a. — Vol. 13, no. 2. — P. 431–448. — doi: 10.5194/se-13-431-2022.
  14. Ognev I., Ebbing J., Lösing M., et al. The thermal state of Volgo–Uralia from Bayesian inversion of surface heat flow and temperature // Geophysical Journal International. — 2022b. — Vol. 232, no. 1. — P. 322–342. — doi: 10.1093/gji/ggac338.
  15. Paraskun V. I., Rozhetskiy B. Y. Database of Oil and gas fields of FSUE ”VNIGNI”. — Rosgeolfond, 2011. — (In Russian).
  16. Sobh M., Ebbing J., Mansi A. H., et al. Inverse and 3D forward gravity modelling for the estimation of the crustal thickness of Egypt // Tectonophysics. — 2019. — Vol. 752. — P. 52–67. — doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.12.002.
  17. Zheng W., Hsu H., Zhong M., et al. Requirements Analysis for Future Satellite Gravity Mission Improved-GRACE // Surveys in Geophysics. — 2014. — Vol. 36, no. 1. — P. 87–109. — doi: 10.1007/s10712-014-9306-y.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Ognev I., Khamidullina G., Nourgaliev D., Garaev F., Ikhsanova D., Mulikova D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.