Social and Symbolic Spaces in the Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper introduces the history of the concept of social space of Pierre Bourdieu in its interaction with symbolic space. The primary focus is such an issue as the relationship between the objective scientific classification of social relations and the practical everyday classifications of social agents. Symbolic space is realized as a space of lifestyles that express differences that are objectively inscribed in the living conditions of social agents. According to Bourdieu, the connecting mechanism between social space and symbolic space (the space of lifestyles) is habitus. It is a system of stable dispositions that incorporate the agent’s experience and function as a matrix of perception, evaluation and action. Bourdieu seeks to show how the same structural invariant is reproduced simultaneously in both social and symbolic spaces. He constructs a social space using contemporary French society as an empirical object. The study demonstrated how the French social space can be characterized by three dimensions, which Bourdieu identified as the total volume of capital, composition of capital, and evolution of capital (evolution of social position in time).

About the authors

Natalia A. Shmatko

HSE University

Email: nshmatko@hse.ru
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences Moscow, Russia

Yulia V. Markova

Independent researcher

Email: yulia.markova@gmail.com
Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Independent Researcher Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Бурдье П. Генезис и структура поля религии / Пер. с фр. О.И. Кирчик // Бурдье П. Социальное пространство: Поля и практики / Под ред. Н.А. Шматко. СПб., М.: Алетейя, Институт экспериментальной социологии, 2005. С. 7–74.
  2. Дюркгейм Э. Социология. Ее предмет, метод, назначение / Пер. с фр. А.Б. Гофман. М.: Канон, 1995. — 352 с.
  3. Atkinson W. Charting fields and spaces quantitatively: From multiple correspondence analysis to categorical principal components analysis. Quality & Quantity. 2024. Vol. 58. P. 829–848. doi: 10.1007/s11135-023-01669-w EDN: AJANGT
  4. Atkinson W., Schmitz A. The German social space and its homologies: National variation on a basic structure. Current Sociology. 2024. Vol. 72. No. 1. P. 168–191. doi: 10.1177/00113921221100582 EDN: FWLYRB
  5. Atkinson W., Marzec P. The German Space of Lifestyles: A Multidetermined Structure. Journal of Consumer Culture. 2023. Vol. 23. No. 4. P. 926–948. doi: 10.1177/14695405221149117 EDN: CWBUSN
  6. Atkinson W. The social space and misrecognition in 21st century France. The Sociological Review. 2021. Vol. 69. No. 5. P. 990–1012. doi: 10.1177/00380261211020182 EDN: VUUHRH
  7. Bennett T., Emmison M., Frow J. Accounting for Tastes: Australian Everyday Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 328 p.
  8. Bennett T., Savage M., Silva E.B., Warde A., Gayo-Cal M., Wright D. Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge, 2009. 336 p. doi: 10.4324/9780203930571
  9. Blasius J., Friedrichs J. Lifestyles in distressed neighborhoods: A test of Bourdieu’s “taste of necessity” hypothesis. Poetics. 2008. Vol. 36. No. 1. P. 24–44. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2007.12.001
  10. Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 348 p.
  11. Bourdieu P. Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique: précédé de trois études d’ethnologie Kabyle. Genève: Librairie Droz, 1972. 269 p. doi: 10.3917/droz.bourd.1972.01
  12. Bourdieu P. General Sociology, Volume 1. Classification Struggles: Lectures at the Collège de France (1981—1982). Ed. by P. Champagne, J. Duval, F. Poupeau, M.-C. Rivière. Cambridge: Polity, 2018. 182 p.
  13. Bourdieu P. La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1979. 680 p.
  14. Bourdieu P. Méditations pascaliennes: Éléments pour une philosophie négative. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1997. 316 p.
  15. Bourdieu P. Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1994. 251 p.
  16. Bourdieu P. Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory. 1989. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 14–25. doi: 10.2307/202060
  17. Coulangeon P., Lemel Y. Is “Distinction” Really Outdated? Questioning the Meaning of the Omnivorization of Musical Taste in Contemporary France. Poetics. 2007. Vol. 35. No. 2. P. 93–111. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2007.03.006
  18. Desrosières A., Thévenot L. Les catégories socioprofessionnelles. Paris: La Découverte, 1988. 128 p.
  19. Empirical investigations of social space. Ed. by J. Blasius, F. Lebaron, B. Le Roux, A. Schmitz. Cham: Spring-er Cham, 2019. 440 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15387-8
  20. Flemmen M., Jarness V., Rosenlund L. Social space and cultural class divisions: The forms of capital and con-temporary lifestyle differentiation. The British Journal of Sociology. 2018. Vol. 69. No 1. P. 124–153. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12295
  21. Ginsburger M. The More It Changes the More It Stays the Same: The French Social Space of Material Consumption between 1985 and 2017. British Journal of Sociology. 2022. Vol. 73. No. 4. P. 706–753. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12970
  22. Katchanov Yu.L., Shmatko N.A. The idea of social space by Pierre Bourdieu. Russian Sociological Review. 2024. Vol. 23. No. 4. P. 203–226. doi: 10.17323/1728-192x-2024-4-196-220
  23. Le Roux L., Rouanet H. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2010. 126 p. doi: 10.4135/9781412993906
  24. Multivariate Scaling Methods and the Reconstruction of Social Spaces: Papers in Honor of Jörg Blasius. Ed. by A. Barth, F. Leßke, R. Atakan, M. Schmidt, Y. Scheit. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 2023. 259 p. doi: 10.3224/84742764
  25. Noûs C., Robette N., Roueff O. The Multidimensional Structure of Taste: A Cultural Legitimacy Based on Interactions between Education, Age, and Gender. Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods. 2021. Vol. 8. doi: 10.4000/bssg.625
  26. Quantifying Theory: Pierre Bourdieu. Ed. by K. Robson, C. Sanders. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009. 228 p. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020 -9450-7
  27. Roueff O. Les homologies structurales: une magie sociale sans magiciens? La place des intermédiaires dans la fabrique des valeurs. Trente ans après La Distinction de Pierre Bourdieu. Dir. P. Coulangeon, J. Duval. Paris: La Découverte, 2014. P. 153–164. doi: 10.3917/dec.coula.2013.01.0153
  28. Rupp J.C.C. Les classes populaires dans un espace social à deux dimensions. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. 1995. Vol. 109. No. 1. P. 93–98. doi: 10.3406/arss.1995.3156
  29. Schwartz O. Peuton parler des classes populaires? Un texte inédit d’Olivier Schwartz. La Vie des idées. 13 septembre 2011. Accessed 12.09.2024. URL: https://laviedesidees.fr/Peut-on-parler-des-classes.html
  30. Sociologie des classes populaires contemporaines. Dir. Y. Siblot, I. Coutant, N. Renahy, [et al.]. Paris: Colin, 2015. 368 p.
  31. The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction. Ed. by P. Coulangeon, J. Duval. London: Routledge, 2015. 344 p.
  32. Trente Ans Après La Distinction de Pierre Bourdieu. Dir. P. Coulangeon, J. Duval. Paris: La Découverte, 2013. 272 p. doi: 10.3917/dec.coula.2013.01
  33. Wacquant L. Bourdieu in the City: Challenging Urban Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2023. 288 p.
  34. Wacquant L., Akçaoğlu A. Practice and symbolic power in Bourdieu: The view from Berkeley. Journal of Classical Sociology. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 37–51. doi: 10.1177/1468795X16682145

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).