The New Sociology of Morality: Cognitive and Analytical Perspectives

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article presents analysis of the prospects for the development of the new sociology of morality in the context of ongoing efforts to institutionalize this area of research. In order to assess and generally classify the theoretical and empirical research that has been conducted as part of this project so far, as well as to determine the possible and potentially promising directions for its further evolution, the author identifies two complementary perspectives — cognitive and analytical sociology of morality. This distinction is proposed based on opposing views held by the authors of this research tradition concerning the extent to which the sociology of morality should incorporate the models of explanation and methods of studying morality from the (much more popular and influential) field of cognitive psychology. The article contains a brief general overview of several conceptual and empirical works that serve as examples of each of the two identified perspectives, and also explicates the differences between them based on three dimensions — theoretical, methodological, and axiological. In addition, the article discusses the key features and potential problems for the future development of cognitive and analytical perspectives in sociology of morality, while also identifying a few potential ways to overcome them. Thus, this work contributes to the ongoing development of the program to research the new sociology of morality by demonstrating crucial features and pointing out the key problems of the two identified perspectives, as well as revealing their potential in terms of deepening both sociological and interdisciplinary knowledge about the nature of human moral capacity.

About the authors

Andrey V. Bykov

HSE University; Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS

Email: a.bykov@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8391-8674
ResearcherId: N-3774-2015
Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, HSE University; Research Fellow, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Быков А.В. Социология морали и эволюционная теория: история и перспективы взаимодействия // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 1. С. 127–136. EDN: XXRROZ
  2. Девятко И.Ф. Понятие ценности в социологической теории: влияние и (недооцененные) возможности его интерпретации с позиций гештальт-психологии // Социологические исследования. 2020. № 10. С. 3–12. doi: 10.31857/S013216250011945-2 EDN: MYVLQP
  3. Девятко И.Ф. Проблема ориентации искусственного интеллекта на человеческие ценности (AI value alignment) и социология морали // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 9. С. 16–28. doi: 10.31857/S013216250027775-5 EDN: QVKPLQ
  4. Калинин Р.Г., Девятко И.Ф. Кто заплатит за водопровод: социальный контекст восприятия дистрибутивной справедливости // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2019. № 2. С. 95–114. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.2.05 EDN: ONMLFV
  5. Нарьян С.К., Быков А.В. Проблема моральной агентности акторов: перспективы социологического подхода в контексте теории «моральной диады» // Социологический журнал. 2022. Т. 28. № 1. С. 8–23. doi: 10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8835 EDN: NIJSPT
  6. Николаев В.Г. Социологическая теория в России: на распутьях фрагментации и плюрализма // Социологические исследования. 2022. № 1. С. 30–40. doi: 10.31857/S013216250017450-8 EDN: NPYMDC
  7. Abbott O. The self, relational sociology, and morality in practice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. 189 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-31822-2
  8. Abend G. Two main problems in the sociology of morality. Theory and Society. 2008. Vol. 37. No. 2. P. 87–125. doi: 10.1007/s11186-0079044-y EDN: JZPTBN
  9. Abend G. What’s new and what’s old about the new sociology of morality. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. N.Y.: Springer, 2010. P. 561–584. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_30
  10. Abend G. Thick concepts and the moral brain. European Journal of Sociology. 2011. Vol. 52. No. 1. P. 143–172. doi: 10.1017/S0003975611000051
  11. Abend G. The moral background: An inquiry into the history of business ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014. 339 p. doi: 10.1515/9781400850341
  12. Auriemma V., Iorio G., Morese R., Rama R. Editorial: Neurosociology: A new field for transdisciplinary social analysis. Frontiers in Sociology. 2022. No. 7. P. 911361. Accessed 22.11.2023. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.911361
  13. Bykov A. Altruism: New perspectives of research on a classical theme in sociology of morality. Current Sociology. 2017. Vol. 65. No. 6. P. 797–813. doi: 10.1177/0011392116657861
  14. Bykov A. Rediscovering the moral: The ‘old’ and ‘new’ sociology of morality in the context of the behavioural sciences. Sociology. 2019. Vol. 53. No. 1. P. 192–207. doi: 10.1177/0038038518783967
  15. Carrol J. Skeptical sociology. N.Y.: Routledge, 2014. 216 p.
  16. Deviatko I.F., Bykov A. Weighing the moral worth of altruistic actions: A discrepancy between moral evaluations and prescriptive judgments. Philosophical Psychology. 2022. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 95–121. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2021.1950666
  17. Durkheim E. Sociology and philosophy. N.Y.: Routledge, 2010. 51 p. doi: 10.4324/9780203092361
  18. Ellemers N., van der Toorn J., Paunov Y., van Leeuwen T. The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2019. Vol. 23. No. 4. P. 332–366. doi: 10.1177/1088868318811759
  19. Firat R., McPherson C.M. Toward an integrated science of morality. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. N.Y.: Springer, 2010. P. 361–384. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_19
  20. Handbook of neurosociology. Ed. by D.D. Franks, J.H. Turner. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. 406 p.
  21. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Vol. 2. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S.M. Dromi, A. Luft. Cham: Springer, 2023. 467 p.
  22. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. N.Y.: Springer, 2010. 595 p.
  23. Hitlin S., Vaisey S. The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 51–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145628
  24. Ignatow G. Why the sociology of morality needs Bourdieu’s Habitus. Sociological Inquiry. 2009. Vol. 79. P. 98–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00273.x
  25. Ignatow G. Morality and mind-body connections. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. N.Y.: Springer, 2010. P. 411–424. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_21
  26. Jeffries V. (ed.) The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a Field of Study. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 434 p. doi: 10.1057/9781137391865
  27. Lamont M. Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and the American upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 350 p. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226922591.001.0001
  28. Levine D.N. Adumbrations of a sociology of morality in the work of Parsons, Simmel, and Merton. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. N.Y.: Springer, 2010. P. 57–72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_4
  29. Lizardo O., Mowry R., Sepulvado B., Stoltz D.S., Taylor M.A., Van Ness J., Wood M. What are dual process models? Implications for cultural analysis in sociology. Sociological Theory. 2016. Vol. 34. No. 4. P. 287–310. doi: 10.1177/0735275116675900
  30. McCaffree K. Moral realism in historical sociological theory. Journal of Historical Sociology. 2019. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 124–141. doi: 10.1111/johs.12204
  31. Miles A., Charron-Chénier R., Schleifer C. Measuring automatic cognition: Advancing dual-process research in sociology. American Sociological Review. 2019. Vol. 84. No. 2. P. 308–333. doi: 10.1177/0003122419832497
  32. Miles A., Vaisey S. Morality and politics: Comparing alternate theories. Social Science Research. 2015. Vol. 53. P. 252–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.06.002
  33. Nastina E., Deviatko I.F. Different path to happiness: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction in benefiting close and distant others. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2023. Vol. 40. No. 9. P. 3004–3027. doi: 10.1177/02654075231165720
  34. Pölzler T., Wright J.C. Empirical research on folk moral objectivism. Philosophy Compass. 2019. 14:e12589. Accessed 22.11.2023. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12589
  35. Sayer A. The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 247 p. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511488863
  36. Sayer A. Class and morality. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. N.Y.: Springer, 2010. P. 163–178. doi: 10.1007/978-14419-6896-8_9
  37. Tavory I. The question of moral action: A formalist position. Sociological Theory. 2011. Vol. 29. No. 4. P. 272–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01400.x
  38. Turner J.H. Natural selection and the evolution of morality in human societies. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S. Vaisey. N.Y.: Springer, 2010. P. 125–146. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_7
  39. Turner J.H. The structure, culture, and biology driving moralization of the human Universe. Handbook of the sociology of morality. Vol. 2. Ed. by S. Hitlin, S.M. Dromi, A. Luft. Cham: Springer, 2023. P. 73–99. doi: 10.1007/978-3031-32022-4_5
  40. Turner S. Social theory as a cognitive neuroscience. European Journal of Social Theory. 2007. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 357–374. doi: 10.1177/1368431007080700
  41. Vaisey S. Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology. 2009. Vol. 114. No. 6. P. 1675–1715. doi: 10.1086/597179
  42. Vaisey S., Miles A. Tools from moral psychology for measuring personal moral culture. Theory and Society. 2014. Vol. 43. No. 3–4. P. 311–332. doi: 10.1007/s11186-014-9221-8
  43. Vanke A. Researching lay perceptions of inequality through images of society: Compliance, inversion and subversion of power hierarchies. Sociology. 2023. Online First. Accessed 22.11.2023. doi: 10.1177/00380385231194867
  44. Weiss R., Gomes N.J. Talcott Parsons and the sociology of morality. The American Sociologist. 2021. Vol. 52. P. 107–130. doi: 10.1007/s12108-02009466-w

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).