Socio-hygienic research and assessment of the quality of life of cosmetology patients

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Health is largely determined by environmental factors. A number of skin diseases, as well as its age-related changes, are a poorly studied medical and social problem. The procedures provided in cosmetology clinics can be considered a relative indicator of an improvement in the quality of life, directly related to the restoration and maintenance of balance and harmony of individual and public health of a person with the natural and social environment.

The analysis of the quality of life of patients with cosmetology profile was carried out. It is noted that despite the rapid development of cosmetology, information proving the impact of surgical and non-surgical cosmetic procedures on the patient’s quality of life is limited; there are no effective, reliable rating scales for the patient’s self-assessment of the results of cosmetic therapy. Sociocultural and quality of life factors that force patients to undergo these procedures are not well understood.

The results of a sociological survey of patients with a cosmetology profile allow cosmetologists to plan a complex of interventions for the prevention and correction of age-related changes in appearance, emphasize the professional image of a specialist. The development of rating scales and methods for assessing the quality of botulinum therapy and the patient’s self-assessment of the results of medical care provided on the principles of evidence-based medicine is an urgent issue.

About the authors

Olga Yu. Olisova

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: olisovaolga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2482-1754
SPIN-code: 2500-7989

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Olga N. Krasilnikova

ValleksMed

Author for correspondence.
Email: olga@drkrasilnikova.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8009-1771
SPIN-code: 6534-8254
Russian Federation, 62 Starokaluzhskoe shosse, 117630, Moscow

References

  1. Lazebnik LB, Vertkin AL, Konev YV, et al. Aging: a professional medical approach: a national guide. Moscow : EXPO; 2014. 320 p. (In Russ).
  2. Ko AC, Korn BS, Kikkawa DO. The aging face. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62(2):190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.09.002
  3. Ran W, Gao S. [Advances in treatment of facial rejuvenation in the past ten years. (In Chinese)]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018;32(7):809–814. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201806031
  4. Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI. Textbook of Aging Skin [Electronic resource]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. Available from: https://rd.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-642-27814-3
  5. Krayushkin P. Hardware procedures in cosmetology: the choice of young patients. Kosmetik International. 2015;(3):42–47. (In Russ).
  6. Gubanova EI. Cosmetology today: development guidelines and main trends. Kosmetik International. 2015;(2):16–25. (In Russ).
  7. Gubanova EI, Sharova AA, Orlova OR, Hernandez EI. Aesthetic botulinum therapy. New cosmetology. Injection methods in cosmetology. Ed. by E.I. Hernandez. Moscow: Cosmetics and Medicine; 2018. Р. 22–84. (In Russ).
  8. Filippova LI. Medical and social problems of the organization of cosmetological care to the population at the regional level (on the example of the Nizhny Novgorod region) [dissertation abstract]. Ivanovo; 2004. 21 p. (In Russ).
  9. Gutop E. Well-groomed face: the facets of the possible. Kosmetik International. 2015;(4):24–30.
  10. Maisel A, Waldman A, Furlan K, et al. Self-reported patient motivations for seeking cosmetic procedures. JAMA Dermatology. 2018;154(10):1167–1174. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2357
  11. Imadojemu S, Sarwer DB, Percec I, et al. Influence of surgical and minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures on psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatology. 2013;149(11):1325–1333. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6812
  12. Jung MH, Moon JS. A Study on the effect of beauty service of the elderly on successful ageing: focused on mediated effect of self-esteem. J Asian Finance Econom Business. 2018;5(4):213–223. doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no4.213
  13. Kubanova AA, Lesnaya IN, Chub SG. On the question of the new in the specialty: organizational and practical aspects. Organization and Modernization of Healthcare. 2010;(5):29–34. (In Russ).
  14. Kubanova AA, Martynov AA, Vlasova AV. The century-old experience of domestic dermatovenerology. Stages of development of skin and venereological assistance to the population (part III). Bulletin of Dermatology and Venereology. 2018;(2):12–26. (In Russ).
  15. Goncharova OO. Key trends of the injection cosmetology market in Russia in 2016. Injection Methods in Cosmetology. 2017;(2):4–9. (In Russ).
  16. Redaelli A. Complex correction of age-related changes in the skin of the face. The philosophy of Professor A. Redaelli. Translated from the English by V.P. Adaskevich. Moscow : MEDpress-inform; 2016. 160 p. (In Russ).
  17. Redaelli A, Manturova NE, Stenko AG. Scales for evaluating the results of aesthetic treatment of the face with complex correction with botulinum toxin A (Dysport®) and fillers based on hyaluronic acid. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy. 2017;26(1):31–34. (In Russ).
  18. Olisova OY, Zaslavsky DV, Sydikov AA, et al. Clinical aspects and algorithm of diagnostics of erythroderma of various dermatoses. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2018;21(2):72–80. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1560-9588-2018-21-2-72-80
  19. Pozdnyakova MA, Krasilnikova ON. Business games in the practice of a cosmetologist. In: XXXIX International scientific readings (in memory of A.E. Kovarsky). Collection of articles of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow; 2018. Р. 96–103. (In Russ).
  20. Public health and healthcare: National guidelines. Ed. by V.I. Starodubov, O.P. Shchepin, et al. Moscow : GEOTAR-Media; 2014. 624 p. (In Russ).
  21. Plotnikova EV, Elkin VD, Demchuk ND, Mironov AN. Possibilities of aesthetic correction of the face with botulinum toxin type A in combination with hemagglutinin. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2013;(1):54–57. (In Russ).
  22. Javaeva DG, Bazaev VT, Pashinyan AG, et al. About the basic principles of maintaining medical documentation in medical institutions of dermatocosmetological profile. Medical Business. 2014;(2):55–57. (In Russ).
  23. Olisova OY, Lukashov MI, Pishennaya EV. The choice of rational treatment regimens for various clinical variants of the course of herpetic infection. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2016;19(1):41–44. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1560-9588-2016-19-1-41-44
  24. Kubanov AA, Kaspirovich MA, Melekhina LE, et al. Informatization of medical organizations of the dermatovenerological profile. Modern requirements of statistical accounting. Bulletin of Dermatology and Venereology. 2012;(1):6–12. (In Russ).
  25. Borisevich IV. Marketing study of the market of cosmetic services in a large city [dissertation abstract]. Saint-Petersburg; 2006. 27 p. (In Russ).
  26. Razumovskaya EA. Clinical aspects of using the mapping system of the upper third of the face when using Botox®. Aesthetic Medicine. 2016;(2):179–187. (In Russ).
  27. Plaksin S, Khramtsova N. Assessment of the quality of life and features of self-perception in women who applied for aesthetic correction. Kosmetik International. 2018;(4):30–33. (In Russ).
  28. Wieczorek IT, Hibler BP, Rossi AM. Injectable cosmetic procedures for the male patient. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14(9):1043–1051.
  29. Rakhimullina OA. Medical opportunities and social relevance of new methods of cosmetology practice (on the example of studies of the use of botulinum toxin type A) [dissertation abstract]. Volgograd; 2009. 28 p. (In Russ).
  30. Petrova NN, Smirnova IO. Patients of cosmetology practice ― a risk group of psychosocial maladaptation. Health-The Basis of Human Potential: Problems and Ways to Solve Them. 2017;12(3):920–921. (In Russ).
  31. Sobanko JF, Taglienti AJ, Wilson AJ. Motivations for seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures in an academic outpatient setting. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2015;35(8):1014–1020. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv094
  32. Martynov SE, Arina GA. Factors of psychological readiness to become a patient of aesthetic medicine. Archive of Internal Medicine. 2016;6(S1):82. (In Russ).
  33. Furnham A, Levitas J. Factors that motivate people to undergo cosmetic surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(4):e47–50.
  34. Korenevskaya AY. Principles of the formation of the image of a modern woman. The conditionality of the choice of correction depending on the age category and modern aesthetic trends. Metamorphoses. 2017;(20):4–9. (In Russ).
  35. Zadionchenko EV, Kazakova PO. The demand for cosmetic procedures, depending on the psychological aspects of the individual. Applied Psychology and Pedagogy. 2019;4(2):11–26. (In Russ). doi: 10.12737/article_5d1284224dea37.06601554
  36. Plaksin S, Khramtsova N. Cosmetology VS aesthetic surgery: clinical and psychological portrait of a patient. Kosmetik International. 2017;(1):59–64. (In Russ).
  37. Vissarionov VA, Medvedev VE. Prevalence of affective and anxiety disorders among patients of a plastic surgeon and cosmetologist. Archive of Internal Medicine. 2016;6(S1):83. (In Russ).
  38. Sedova NN, Krainova IY. Services of aesthetic medicine in a modern Russian city. Sociology of the City. 2016;(4):27–36. (In Russ).
  39. Rakhimullina OA, Krainova IY. Citizens as consumers of cosmetic services. Sociology of the City. 2013;(4):11–17. (In Russ).
  40. Ross NA, Todd Q, Saedi N. Patient seeking behaviors and online personas: social media’s role in cosmetic dermatology. Dermatologic Surgery. 2015;41(2):269–276. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000267
  41. Lee JH, Park YG, Park E. A prospective observational study of the effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin in the horizontal neck lines. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42(5):1370–1378. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1160-8
  42. Javaeva DG. The quality of medical care in the profile «Cosmetology» [dissertation abstract]. Moscow; 2012. 20 р. (In Russ).
  43. França K, Kumar A, Fioranelli M, et al. The history of Botulinum toxin: from poison to beauty. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017;167(Suppl. 1):46–48. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0553-7
  44. Kane MA, Gold MH, Coleman WP, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the equivalence of incobotulinumtoxina and onabotulinumtoxina for glabellar frown lines. Dermatologic Surgery. 2015;41(11):1310–1131. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000531
  45. Molina B, David M, Jain R, et al. Patient Satisfaction and efficacy of full-facial rejuvenation using a combination of Botulinum toxin type a and hyaluronic acid fille. Dermatologic Surgery. 2015;41(Suppl. 1):325–332. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000548
  46. Alouf E, Murphy T, Alouf G. Botulinum toxin type a: Evaluation of onset and satisfaction. Plastic Surgical Nursing. 2018;38(3):105–113. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000236
  47. Botulinum toxins, fillers and related substances [Electronic resource]. Ed. M.C. Issa, B. Tamura. Springer, Cham; 2018. Available from: https://rd.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-319-20253-2
  48. Pletyanova IV, Karpova EI. Defects of medical care in aesthetic medicine. Metamorphoses. 2018;(23):66–71. (In Russ).

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies