Janus kinase inhibitor in combination therapy for atopic dermatitis
- Authors: Olisova O.Y.1, Kochergin N.G.1, Abdulridha A.1, Myzina K.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Issue: Vol 27, No 5 (2024)
- Pages: 516-525
- Section: DERMATOLOGY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1560-9588/article/view/313025
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dv632984
- ID: 313025
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic recurrent immunoinflammatory skin disease that develops against the background of a genotypic defect in the skin barrier function and innate and adaptive autoimmunity. Currently, there is no specific therapy for atopic dermatitis, so there remains a need to constantly search for effective pathogenetic approaches to its treatment. Today, the Janus kinase type 1 inhibitor abrocitinib is recommended for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
AIM: To conduct a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of the combination of UVB 311 nm with abrocitinib and UVB 311 nm phototherapy against the background of standard therapy according to indications in the treatment of patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period from 2023 to 2024, the dermatological status and quality of life were assessed in 40 patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who were prone to frequent relapses. The patients were treated at the clinic for skin and venereal diseases. Depending on the therapy, all patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 20 patients receiving systemic, topical therapy in combination with UVB 311 nm phototherapy and additionally abrocitinib, at an induction dose of 200 mg followed by a dose of 100 mg. The second group included 20 patients who received systemic, local therapy in combination with UVB 311 nm phototherapy. Upon admission to the hospital and after two months of therapy, a comparative assessment of the DLQI index and an assessment of the prevalence and intensity of skin lesions in accordance with the SCORAD and IGA index were performed, an assessment of the level of IgE in the blood were performed
RESULTS: After the course of therapy, the SCORAD index in patients of the first and second groups decreased statistically significantly (p=0.001) by 2.4 times and 1.6 times, respectively. The DLQI index in patients of the first and second groups after the course of therapy significantly (p=0.001) decreased by 3.2 times, 2.1 times, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a more significant effectiveness of therapy with abrocitinib in combination with UVB 311 nm compared with UVB 311 nm monotherapy in patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Olga Y. Olisova
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: olisovaolga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2482-1754
SPIN-code: 2500-7989
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, MoscowNikolay G. Kochergin
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: nkocha@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7136-4053
SPIN-code: 1403-3031
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowAli Hussein Abdulridha
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: alsadiali901@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1156-1762
Russian Federation, Moscow
Kristina A. Myzina
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: Bashlakova_Kristina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9628-0523
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Weil C, Sugerman PB, Chodick G, et al. Epidemiology and economic burden of atopic dermatitis: Real-world retrospective data from a large nationwide Israeli healthcare provider database. Adv Ther. 2022;39(6):2502–2514. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02120-6
- Cork MJ, Danby SG, Ogg GS. Atopic dermatitis epidemiology and unmet need in the United Kingdom. Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31(8):801–809. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1655137
- Tsai TF, Rajagopalan M, Chu CY, et al. Burden of atopic dermatitis in Asia. J Dermatol. 2019;46(10):825–834. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15048
- Barbarot S, Auziere S, Gadkari A, et al. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in adults: Results from an international survey. Allergy. 2018;73(6):1284–1293. doi: 10.1111/all.13401
- Hülpüsch C, Weins AB, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Reiger M. A new era of atopic eczema research: Advances and highlights. Allergy. 2021;76(11):3408–3421. doi: 10.1111/all.15058
- Darsow U, Wollenberg A, Simon D, et al.; European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis/EADV Eczema Task Force. ETFAD/EADV eczema task force 2009 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(3):317–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03415.x
- Kochergin NG. Skin barier, xerosis, kuperosis. Russ J Allergy. 2013;(6):9–12. EDN: RTLFJD
- Siegfried EC, Jaworski JC, Kaiser JD, Hebert AA. Systematic review of published trials: Long-term safety of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:75. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0607-9
- Salvati L, Cosmi L, Annunziato F, et al. From emollients to biologicals: Targeting atopic dermatitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10381. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910381
- Frazier W, Bhardwaj N. Atopic dermatitis: Diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(10):590–598.
- Wollenberg A, Barbarot S. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: Part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(5):657–682. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14891
- Eichenfield LF, Stripling S, Fung S, et al. recent developments and advances in atopic dermatitis: A focus on epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment in the pediatric setting. Paediatr Drugs. 2022;24(4):293–305. doi: 10.1007/s40272-022-00499-x
- Wang Q, Liu L, Gao S, et al. Guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis in children: A systematic review. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2023;184(2):132–141. doi: 10.1159/000527007
- He Q, Xie X, Chen Q, et al. Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1342810. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1342810
- Wan H, Jia H, Xia T, Zhang D. Comparative efficacy and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A network meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(9):e15636. doi: 10.1111/dth.15636
- Deeks ED, Duggan S. Аbrocitinib. Drugs. 2021;81(18):2149–2157. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01638-3
- Mikhailova D, Ungar B, Renert-Yuval Y, Guttman-Jassky E. Oral Janus kinase inhibitors for atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023;130:577–592. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.020
- Tsiogka A, Kyriazopoulou M, Kontochristopoulos G, et al. The JAK/STAT pathway and its selective inhibition in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4431. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154431
- Blauvelt A, Silverberg JI, Lynde CW, et al. Abrocitinib induction, randomized withdrawal, and retreatment in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from the JAK1 atopic dermatitis efficacy and safety (JADE) REGIMEN phase 3 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(1):104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.05.075
- Olisova OYu, Vladimirov VV, Muraxovskaya EK. UVA 370 nm phototherapy of atopic dermatitis. Russ J Skin Venereal Dis. 2013;(6):22–27. doi: 10.17816/dv36837.
- Olisova OYu, Monaxov SA, Korchazhkina NB. Narrow-wave phototherapy 311 nm in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis. Russ J Skin Venereal Dis. 2012;(3):25–27. EDN: PFBPCL doi: 10.17816/dv36660
Supplementary files
