Study of the Formation Time of a Self-Sustained Subnanosecond Discharge at High and Ultrahigh Gas Pressures


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The formation times of self-sustained subnanosecond discharges in nitrogen at pressures of 1‒40 atm and in hydrogen at pressures of 1–60 atm are analyzed in terms of the avalanche model. In experiments, a subnanosecond voltage pulse with an amplitude of 102 ± 2 kV was applied to a 0.5-mm-long discharge gap with a uniformly distributed electric field (the curvature radii of both the cathode and anode ends were 1 cm). The rise time of the voltage pulse from 0.1 to 0.9 of its amplitude value was about 250 ps. Breakdown occurred at the leading edge of the pulse. The discharge formation time was measured at different gas pressures with a step of 5–10 atm. Analysis of the experimental results shows that, in nitrogen at pressures of 10–40 atm and in hydrogen at pressures of 20–50 atm, breakdown occurs earlier than the electron avalanche reaches its critical length and that the critical avalanche length lies in the range of (2–8) × 10–2 mm, which is one order of magnitude shorter than the discharge gap length. This means that the avalanche–streamer model is inapplicable in this case. The fast formation of a conducting channel under these conditions can be explained by ionization of gas by runaway electrons. In this case, the conducting column develops as a result of simultaneous development of a large number of electron avalanches in the gas volume. An increase in the hydrogen pressure from 50 to 60 atm leads to an abrupt increase in the discharge formation time by about 50%. As a result, the growth time of the electron avalanche to its critical length becomes shorter than the discharge formation time. In this case, the electrons cease to pass into the runaway regime and the discharge is initiated from the cathode due to field emission from microinhomogeneities on its surface. Under these conditions, the discharge formation time is well described by the avalanche–streamer model.

About the authors

S. N. Ivanov

Institute of Electrophysics, Ural Branch

Author for correspondence.
Email: stivan@iep.uran.ru
Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg, 620016

V. V. Lisenkov

Institute of Electrophysics, Ural Branch; Yeltsin Ural Federal University

Email: stivan@iep.uran.ru
Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg, 620016; Yekaterinburg, 620075

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.