X-ray structures of uridine phosphorylase from Vibrio cholerae in complexes with uridine, thymidine, uracil, thymine, and phosphate anion: Substrate specificity of bacterial uridine phosphorylases


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In many types of human tumor cells and infectious agents, the demand for pyrimidine nitrogen bases increases during the development of the disease, thus increasing the role of the enzyme uridine phosphorylase in metabolic processes. The rational use of uridine phosphorylase and its ligands in pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries requires knowledge of the structural basis for the substrate specificity of the target enzyme. This paper summarizes the results of the systematic study of the three-dimensional structure of uridine phosphorylase from the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio cholerae in complexes with substrates of enzymatic reactions—uridine, phosphate anion, thymidine, uracil, and thymine. These data, supplemented with the results of molecular modeling, were used to consider in detail the structural basis for the substrate specificity of uridine phosphorylases. It was shown for the first time that the formation of a hydrogen-bond network between the 2′-hydroxy group of uridine and atoms of the active-site residues of uridine phosphorylase leads to conformational changes of the ribose moiety of uridine, resulting in an increase in the reactivity of uridine compared to thymidine. Since the binding of thymidine to residues of uridine phosphorylase causes a smaller local strain of the β-N1-glycosidic bond in this the substrate compared to the uridine molecule, the β-N1-glycosidic bond in thymidine is more stable and less reactive than that in uridine. It was shown for the first time that the phosphate anion, which is the second substrate bound at the active site, interacts simultaneously with the residues of the β5-strand and the β1-strand through hydrogen bonding, thus securing the gate loop in a conformation

About the authors

I. I. Prokofev

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”

Email: alashkov83@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119333

A. A. Lashkov

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”

Author for correspondence.
Email: alashkov83@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119333

A. G. Gabdulkhakov

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”

Email: alashkov83@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119333

V. V. Balaev

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”

Email: alashkov83@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119333

T. A. Seregina

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”

Email: alashkov83@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119333

A. S. Mironov

State Research Institute of Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms

Email: alashkov83@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 117545

C. Betzel

University of Hamburg

Email: alashkov83@gmail.com
Germany, Mittelweg 177, Hamburg, 20148

A. M. Mikhailov

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”

Email: alashkov83@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119333


Copyright (c) 2016 Pleiades Publishing, Inc.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies