A comparative analysis of the active and residual magnetization methods in the nondestructive testing of rails


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The comparison of residual Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) with traditional MFL method was carried out as applied to rail nondestructive testing. The mechanisms for the residual magnetization of rails are considered. It is concluded that the traditional Magnetic Flux Leakage method is more effective as compared with one based on а rail remanence.

作者简介

A. Antipov

St. Petersburg State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: a.antipov@phys.spbu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199164

A. Markov

OAO Radioavionica

Email: a.antipov@phys.spbu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Troitskii pr. 4b, St. Petersburg, 190103

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2016