A comparative analysis of the active and residual magnetization methods in the nondestructive testing of rails
- 作者: Antipov A.G.1, Markov A.A.2
-
隶属关系:
- St. Petersburg State University
- OAO Radioavionica
- 期: 卷 52, 编号 3 (2016)
- 页面: 155-160
- 栏目: Magnetic and Electromagnetic Methods
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1061-8309/article/view/181114
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830916030037
- ID: 181114
如何引用文章
详细
The comparison of residual Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) with traditional MFL method was carried out as applied to rail nondestructive testing. The mechanisms for the residual magnetization of rails are considered. It is concluded that the traditional Magnetic Flux Leakage method is more effective as compared with one based on а rail remanence.
作者简介
A. Antipov
St. Petersburg State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: a.antipov@phys.spbu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199164
A. Markov
OAO Radioavionica
Email: a.antipov@phys.spbu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Troitskii pr. 4b, St. Petersburg, 190103
补充文件
