Clinical results of radiation and chemoradiation therapy of locally advanced cervix cancer

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Aim. This study reported clinical results of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who were treated with conformal radiotherapy and three-dimensional (3D) image-guided adapted brachytherapy and combinations of cytotoxic drugs.

Material and methods. This study included 190 patients with cervical cancer stages IIb, IIIb, and IVb (metastases in para-aortic lymph nodes) during 2011–2015 treated with definitive conformal radiation or chemoradiotherapy, with total dose for D95 50 Gy for 25 fractions. 3D brachytherapy high dose rate planning and dose reporting followed the GEC-ESTRO recommendations. Prescribing dose per fraction for HR-CTV D90 was 7.5 Gy weekly 4 fractions. Total dose HR-CTV D90 40 Gy (EQD2). Average total dose for HR-CTV D90 from the course of radiation therapy was 95.0 ± 0.67 Gy (EQD2).

Following four groups of patient were evaluated: group 1 – radiation therapy (n = 72), group 2 – chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin (n = 40), group 3 – chemoradiation therapy with a combination of irinotecan + cisplatin, two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 39), group 4 – chemoradiation therapy with a combination of paclitaxel + cisplatin, two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 39). Clinical outcomes including local control (LC), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.

Results. Three-year OS and CSS in all these groups were as follows: group 1 – 88.4% ± 4.5% and 64.4% ± 7.3%, respectively; group 2 – 77.7% ± 7.6% and 77.5% ± 7.1%, respectively; group 3 – 69.8% ± 9.6% and 66.3% ± 8.9%, respectively; group 4 – 81.3% ± 6.4% and 62.1% ± 8.0%, respectively (p > 0.05). The use of chemoradiotherapy in the groups did not increase the 3-year OS in cervical cancer stage IIIb: in group 1 – 84.0% ± 7.5%, group 2 – 76.2% ± 9.4%; group 3 – 77.2% ± 9.1%, and group 4 – 84.9% ± 7.0% (p > 0.05). However, CSS was higher on the first year of observation in group 3 – 96.3% ± 3.6% compared with group 1 – 74.2% ± 7.5% (p = 0.049), with a 3-year observation – 75.7% ± 9.6% and 59.0% ± 11.4%, respectively (p = 0.31). Combined chemoradiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer increases the time of progression from 9.5 months (in groups 1 and 2) up to 19.4 months and 16.4 months (in groups 3 and 4), respectively (p = 0.05). A decrease in the number of local relapses during 3 years was obtained in groups 2 and 4 compared with group 1 (100% vs. 90.3%, p = 0.05). LC within 3 years among 190 patients was 94.7% ± 1.6%. Gastrointestinal early toxicity was noted higher in group 3 compared to groups 1, 2, and 4 (recites G2–3 – 25.7% vs. 5.6%, 5.0%, and 2.6%, respectively, p = 0.05). Late cystitis G2–3 is higher in groups 2, 3, 4 compared with group 1 (15.4% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.07).

Conclusion. The study showed high efficiency of treatment of patients with cervical cancer with the introduction in the clinic of modern technologies in radiation therapy with 3D visualization, as well as chemoradiotherapy programs with acceptable toxicity.

作者简介

Olga Kravets

N.N. Blokhin’s National Medical Research Center of Oncology

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Kravetz_olga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3347-5278

MD, PhD, DSc, Senior Researcher, Department of Radiosurgery, N.N. Blokhin’s National Medical Research Center of Oncology

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

E. Romanova

N.N. Blokhin’s National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: Kravetz_olga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0101-512X
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

V. Gorbunova

N.N. Blokhin’s National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: Kravetz_olga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0703-2550
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Kaprin A.D., Starinskij V. V., Petrov G. V. State of Oncology aid rendered to population of Russia in 2017. Moscow: MNIOI name P.A. Gertsena – branch Rams «NMIC Radiology» of Ministry of health of Russia. 2018. (In Russian).
  2. Castelnau-Marchand P., Chargari C., Maroun P. et al. Clinical outcomes of definitive chemoradiation followed by intracavitary pulsed-dose rate im age-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015;139(2):288-94
  3. Chargari C., N. Magné I., Dumas T. et al. Physics contributions and clinical outcome with 3D-MRI-based pulsed-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009;74(1):133-9.
  4. Lakosi F., de Cuypere M., Viet Nguyen P. et al. Clinical efficacy and toxicity of radio-chemotherapy and magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer patients: A mono-institutional experience. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1558-66.
  5. Potter R., Georg P., Dimopoulos J.C. et al. Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 2011;100(1):116-23.
  6. Tharavichitkul E., Chakrabandhu S., Wanwilairat S. et al. Intermediate-term results of image-guided brachytherapy and high-technology external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer: Chiang Mai University experience. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;130: 81-5.
  7. Lin A.J., Kidd E., Dehdashti F. et al. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Image-Guided Adapted Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer. Int. J. Radia.t Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019;103(5):1088-097.
  8. Gill B.S., Kim H., Houser C.J. et al. MRI-guided high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for treatment of cervical cancer: the University of Pittsburgh experience. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2015;91(3):540-7.
  9. McNeil C. New standard of care for cervical cancer sets stage for next questions. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1999;91(6):500-1.
  10. Duenas-Gonzalez A., Cetina-Peraz L., Onate-Ocana L.E. et al. Multimodel treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Arch. Med. Res. 2005;36(2):129-35.
  11. Jelavic T.B., Mise B.P., Strikic A. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer after treatment with concomitant chemoradiotherapy-room for improvement? Anticancer Res. 2015;35(7):4161-5.
  12. Umayahara K., Takekuma M., Hitashima Y. et al. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: The JACCRO GY-01 trial. J. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140(2):253-8.
  13. Tanqiitqamol S., Katanyoo K., Laopaiboon M. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent for locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014;12.
  14. Mayadev J., Viswanathan A., Liu Y. et al. American Brachytherapy Task Group Report: A pooled analysis of clinical outcomes for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Brachytherapy. 2017;16(1):22-43.
  15. Kravets O.A. Radiotherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer (treatment optimization, prognostic factors): dissertation for the degree of doctor of medical sciences. Moscow. 2010. (In Russian)

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2020


 


##common.cookie##