Choice of surgical treatment approach in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction
- 作者: Shvets D.S.1,2, Kaganov O.I.1,2, Orlov A.E.1,2, Kozlov A.M.1,2, Frolov S.A.1,2, Mikolenko N.I.2
-
隶属关系:
- Samara State Medical University
- Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
- 期: 卷 28, 编号 4 (2023)
- 页面: 177-187
- 栏目: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1028-9984/article/view/266642
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/onco624168
- ID: 266642
如何引用文章
详细
BACKGROUND: Every year more than 1 million new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed worldwide, with approximately 30% patients already having distant metastases. Colorectal cancer is often complicated, which makes chemotherapy challenging or, in some cases, impossible, therefore worsening the prognosis. As the first step, such patients need to undergo surgical treatment, in order to eliminate existing complications. However, what volume of surgery remains a discussion point among ongologists: a colostomy or a cytoreductive r2 resection to remove the primary tumor.
AIM: To analyze the results of complex treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and to optimize surgical treatment approaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a study in Samara regional clinical Oncology dispensary (Samara, Russia), which included patients with metastatic colorectal cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction. Before treatment, all patients were examined according with current clinical standards. Subsequently, the patients were divided into two groups: the first group included patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery (r2 resection to remove the primary lesion due to the presence of colonic obstruction), and the second group included patients who underwent palliative surgery (colostomy or a bypass anastomosis in order to eliminate intestinal obstruction without removing the primary tumor).
RESULTS: We found that postoperative complications in patients who had undergone primary tumor removal were significantly more prevalent. At the same time, however, the number of complications at the stage of chemotherapy, combined with angiogenesis inhibitor therapy, was significantly greater than in the group of patients in whom primary lesion was not removed. Complications that arose during chemotherapy affected the number of chemotherapy cycles performed. Discontinuation of chemotherapy affected event-free and overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Timely identification and elimination of existing complications by removing the primary tumor focus before chemotherapy is an important component of an individual approach in order to develop treatment optimal tactics for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
作者简介
Denis Shvets
Samara State Medical University; Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Email: shvetsdenis@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2934-9933
SPIN 代码: 3682-5192
俄罗斯联邦, Samara; Samara
Oleg Kaganov
Samara State Medical University; Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Email: okaganov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1765-6965
SPIN 代码: 2705-4187
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Samara; SamaraAndrey Orlov
Samara State Medical University; Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Email: orlovae@samaraonko.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6145-3343
SPIN 代码: 8902-5712
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Samara; SamaraAlexey Kozlov
Samara State Medical University; Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Email: amihalu4@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6492-999X
SPIN 代码: 1793-2631
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Samara; SamaraSergey Frolov
Samara State Medical University; Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Email: frol_ser@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-1194-3220
SPIN 代码: 6341-0137
俄罗斯联邦, Samara; Samara
Nikita Mikolenko
Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Nekit.Mikolenko@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-7479-155X
俄罗斯联邦, Samara
参考
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Sauer AG, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):145–164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020 GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
- Kaprin AD, Starinskii VV, Shakhzadova AO, editors. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020. Morbidity and mortality. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena — filial FGBU “NMITs radiologii” Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii; 2021. (In Russ).
- Aliev VA, Mamedli ZZ, Barsukov YuA, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer. Evolution of treatment strategies: surgeons’ point of view. Pelvic Surgery and Oncology. 2021;11(1):42–59. EDN: PZJIFW doi: 10.17650/2686-9594-2021-11-1-42-59
- Wittekind C, Compton C, Quirke P, et al. A uniform residual tumor (R) classification: integration of the R classification and the circumferential margin status. Cancer. 2009;115(15):3483–3488. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24320
- Kozlov AM. Optimization of cytoreductive surgical treatment of colorectal cancer patients with synchronous multiple bilobar metastases to the liver [dissertation]. 2017. (In Russ). EDN: IDLQBM
- Zatevahin II, Magomedovа EG, Pashkov DI. The cancer of a colon complicated by intestinal obstruction. Vestnik khirurgicheskoi gastroenterologii. 2010;(2):30–34. EDN: MXHTSP
- Barsukov YuA, Aliyev VA, Cherkes VL, et al. Cytoreductive surgery in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Vestnik RONTs im. N.N. Blokhina RAMN. 2007;18(3):15–18. EDN: IAPYCF
- Vashakmadze LA, Trakhtenberg AKh, Khomyakov VM, Sidorov DV. Cytoreductive surgery for colorectal cancer with distant metastases. Moscow: FGU “MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena Rosmedtekhnologii”; 2008. (In Russ). EDN: QLXUGX
- Merabishvili VM. Malignant tumors in the North-West Federal Region of Russia (morbidity, mortality, index accuracy, survival). Express – information. Fifth Issue. Belyaev AM, Shcherbakov AM, editors. Saint Petersburg; 2020.
- Sidorov DV, Troitsky AA, Lozhkin MV, Grishin NA, Stepanyuk IV. Immediate and long-term results of total mesorectumectomy for rectal cancer. A single-center prospective study. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2021;10(1):5–11. EDN: EGBQEY doi: 10.17116/onkolog2021100115
- Imyanitov EN. Advances in fundamental oncology: the year 2020 update. Practical oncology. 2021;22(1):1–8. EDN: SBBUET doi: 10.31917/2201001
- Samorodskaya IV, Semenov VY. Malignant neoplasms mortality rates in Moscow and Saint Petersburg in 2015 and 2018. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2020;22(3):79–84. EDN: RCJRTP doi: 10.26442/18151434.2020.3.200192
- Markina IG, Tupitsyn NN, Mikhailova IN, Demidov LV. Hematogenous metastasis of tumors: key points and evolutionary paradigms. Imunologiya gemopoeza. 2018;16(1):109–132. (In Russ). EDN: HHFCKG
- Nasrytdinov TS. Predictive biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Vestnik Kazakhskogo natsional’nogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2019;(1):140–143. EDN: UXSOZK
- Popov SS, Shvedova VG, Bredikhina TA, Mikhailova EV, Shvedov GI. Some aspects of personalized medicine for oncological, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Chemistry. Biology. Pharmacy. 2021;(4):132–141. EDN: YQLLZN
- Gayazova AF, Nagibin SI, Kleschevnikova TM, et al. The importance of tumor markers in diagnosis precancerous diseases of the large intestine at the stage of outpatient care. Medical science and education of Ural. 2018;19(1(93)):131–135. EDN: VZUBKP
- Osombaev MSh, Dzhekshenov MD, Satybaldiev OA, et al. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Meditsinskie nauki. 2021;(1):37–42. EDN: LYEMDE doi: 10.17513/srms.1169
- Krashenkov OP, Ivanikov IO, Konstantinova IuS, et al. Organization of oncological care for patients with colorectal cancer (narrative review). Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2021;10(1):17–29. EDN: OSWYHL doi: 10.17116/dokgastro20211001117
- Maystrenko NA, Khvatov AA, Sazonov AA, Otochkin VV. One-stage combined operations in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. Annals of HPB surgery. 2015;20(2):66–72. EDN: UBDSKR
- Jovine E, Biolchini F, Talarico F, et al. Major hepatectomy in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases: whether or not a contraindication to simultaneous colorectal and liver resection? Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(3):245–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01152.x
- Quireze Junior C, Brasil AMS, Morais LK, et al. Metachronous colorectal liver metastases has better prognosis — is it true? Arq Gastroenterol. 2018;55(3):258–263. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.201800000-64
补充文件
