ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION AND SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME IN PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC HEAD CANCER


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the study - to determine the degree of endothelial dysfunction in the dynamics of the perioperative period in patients with cancer of the pancreatic head in relation to the development and course of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. A total of 42 patients with cancer of the pancreatic head, underwent radical surgery. The parameters of the vascular endothelium: the number of circulating endothelial cells, the content of NO metabolites in blood and excretion, the content of von Willebrand factor in the blood, the level of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome have been determined. It has been revealed that the presence of endothelial dysfunction signs before surgical intervention corresponds to an increase risk of systemic inflammatory response after surgery was significantly correlated with its constituent symptoms.

About the authors

A. F Lazarev

Altay branch of N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

Zh. A Doskaliev

Almaty regional oncological clinic

S. T Olzhaev

Almaty regional oncological clinic

Email: olzhayev@mail.ru
канд. мед. наук, дир.

References

  1. Sorensen L.T., Hemmingsen U., Kallehave F., Wille-Jorgensen P., Kjaergaard J., Moller L.N., Jorgensen T. Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery. Ann. Surg. 2005; 241 (4): 654-8.
  2. Poulsen M., Trezza M., Atimash G.H., Sorensen L.T., Kallehave F., Hemmingsen U., Jorgensen L.N. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality following gastroenterostomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2009; 13 (7): 1238-44.
  3. Huser N., Michalski C.W., Schuster T, Friess H., Kleeff J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic gastroenterostomy for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2009; 96 (7): 711-9.
  4. Bone R.C. Toward an epidemiology and natural history of SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome). J. A. M. A. 1992; 268 (24): 3452-5.
  5. Bory M. Detection of circulating cells: a new diagnostic test of angina at rest. Arch. Mal. Coeur. 1995; 88 (12): 1827-31.
  6. Карпюк В.Б., Черняк Ю.С., Шубич М.Г. Лабораторные критерии оценки NO-синтетазной активности у больных с сосудистыми заболеваниями головного мозга. Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. 1998; 8: 40.
  7. Воробьев А.И., ред. Руководство по гематологии. Т. 3: Патология гемостаза. М.: Издательство Ньюдиамед; 2005.
  8. Celermajer D., Sorensen K.E., Gooch V.M. et al. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992; 340: 1111-5.
  9. Chatterjee A., Catravas J.D. Endothelial nitric oxide (NO) and its pathophysiologic regulation. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2008; 49 (4): 134-40.
  10. Коун Э., Лиотта Л. Инвазивный рост и метастазирование злокачественных новообразований. From: Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 2002. 14th ed.
  11. Балдуева И.А. Противоопухолевые вакцины. Практическая онкология. 2003; 3-4: 157-66.
  12. Новиков В.И., Карандашов В.И., Сидорович И.Г. Иммунотерапия при злокачественных новообразованиях. М.: Медицина; 2002.
  13. Миронов П.И., Альес В. Ф. Молекулярные аспекты системного воспалительного ответа при сепсисе. Реанимация и интенсивная терапия в анестезиологии. Новости науки и техники. 2000; 4: 1-9.
  14. Bone R.C. Toward a theory regarding the pathogenesis of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome: what we do and do not know about cytokine regulation. Crit. Care Med. 2006; 24 (1): 163-72.

Copyright (c) 2013 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies