In vitro production of myeloid-derived suppressor cells from peripheral blood monocytes

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are of interest as key regulators of the immune response for the development and improvement of cellular technologies in biomedicine. Enhancing the suppressive activity of these cells is important for developing therapies for autoimmune diseases and miscarriages, and their suppression may be useful in the treatment of cancer, since MDSCs are known to suppress antitumor immunity. However, there is a problem that prevents the active study of MDSCs, i.e., the difficulty in obtaining sufficient numbers of this cell population. Isolation of MDSCs in cancer patients poses an ethical challenge. Moreover, these MDSC may differ in subpopulation composition and suppressive activity due to individual factors. Researchers who generate human MDSC from bone marrow cells may also face similar problems. Therefore, finding a reliable and affordable source of these cells to facilitate the study of their functions is extremely important. Attempts to obtain human MDSCs in vitro have been ongoing for a long time. GM- CSF, IL-6, IL- 1β, IL-4, PGE2, LPS, M-CSF, IFNγ are described as factors that induce the ex vivo MDSC differentiation. However, despite multiple factors used, not all protocols are clearly reproducible, leading to generation of a sufficient number of cells in the target population. Previously, we had also developed a scheme for MDSC differentiation from CD11b+ cells derived from human peripheral blood, which made it possible to obtain a tangible but still insufficient percentage of cells to study functional activity.

To increase the number of MDSCs in cultures, we developed a protocol aimed for differentiation of these cells from peripheral blood monocytes (CD14+ cells) previously transformed into PCMO (programmed cells of monocytic origin). The monocytes isolated by immunomagnetic separation were cultured in a de-differentiating medium (complete culture medium supplemented with M-CSF, IL-3 and β-mercaptoethanol) for one week. Later on, the medium was replaced by the addition of GM-CSF, being cultured for three days, followed by addition of LPS and IL-1β in order to induce suppressive activity. We have found that culturing CD14+ cells on a two-week schedule with prior creation of dedifferentiation conditions resulted in a slightly decreased percentage of viable cells in culture. However, there was a trend towards an increased ratio of MDSCs in culture (from an average of 34 to 40%) and an increase in their suppressive activity (arginase and IDO expression). The percentage of Arg+ cells increased by average of 10%, and IDO+ cells, by 16%. Moreover, the percentage of mature M-MDSCs was significantly (several-fold) higher when compared with differentiation protocol using CD11b+ cells. Hence, this method of MDSCs production enables us to increase the number of cells belonging to the conditionally “mature” monocyte subpopulation of MDSCs, as well as the percentage of functional suppressor cells in the population. The described scheme may be used to improve the quality of studies aimed at modulating MDSC functions in order to develop new therapeutic approaches.

About the authors

Valeria P. Timganova

Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: timganovavp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4581-1969

PhD (Biology), Research Associate, Laboratory of Cellular Immunology and Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Perm

K. Y. Shardina

Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: shardinak@gmail.com

Research Assistant, Laboratory of Cellular Immunology and Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Perm

M. S. Bochkova

Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: krasnykh-m@mail.ru

PhD (Biology), Research Associate, Laboratory of Cellular Immunology and Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Perm

D. I. Usanina

Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: usanina_d@mail.ru

Research Assistant, Laboratory of Cellular Immunology and Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Perm

S. A. Zamorina

Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: mantissa7@mail.ru

PhD, MD (Biology), Leading Research Associate, Laboratory of Cellular Immunology and Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Ecology and Genetic of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Perm

References

  1. Шардина К.Ю., Заморина С.А., Раев М.Б., Черешнев В.А. Роль миелоидных супрессорных клеток в процессах формирования иммунной толерантности в период беременности // Цитология, 2022. T. 64, № 2. С. 116-125. Shardina K.Yu., Zamorina S.A., Rayev M.B., Chereshnev V.A. The role of myeloid suppressor cells in the processes of formation of immune tolerance during pregnancy. Tsitologiya = Cytology, 2022, Vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 116-125. (In Russ.)]
  2. Crook K.R., Liu P. Role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in autoimmune disease. World J. Immunol., 2014, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 26-33.
  3. Fainaru O., Hantisteanu S., Hallak M. Immature myeloid cells accumulate in mouse placenta and promote angiogenesis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2011, Vol. 204, no. 6, pp. 544.e18-544e23.
  4. Gordon S., Taylor P.R. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2005, Vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 953-964.
  5. Ibanez-Vea M., Zuazo M., Gato M., Arasanz H., Fernandez-Hinojal G., Escors D., Kochan G. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment: current knowledge and future perspectives. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp., 2018, Vol. 66, pp. 113-123.
  6. Köstlin N., Kugel H., Spring B., Leiber A., Marmé A., Henes M., Rieber N., Hartl D., Poets C.F., Gille C. Granulocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells expand in human pregnancy and modulate T-cell responses. Eur. J. Immunol., 2014, Vol. 44, no. 9, no. 2582-2591.
  7. Kumar V., Patel S., Tcyganov E., Gabrilovich D.I. The nature of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Trends Immunol., 2016, Vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 208-220.
  8. Kuwana M., Okazaki Y., Kodama H., Izumi K., Yasuoka H., Ogawa Y., Kawakami Y., Ikeda Y. Human circulating CD14+ monocytes as a source of progenitors that exhibit mesenchymal cell differentiation. J. Leukoc. Biol., 2003, Vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 833-845.
  9. Lechner M.G., Megiel C., Russell S.M., Bingham B., Arger N., Woo T., Epstein A.L. Functional characterization of human Cd33+ and Cd11b+ myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets induced from peripheral blood mononuclear cells co-cultured with a diverse set of human tumor cell lines. J. Transl. Med., 2011, Vol. 9, 90. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-90.
  10. Sanchez-Pino M.D., Dean M.J., Ochoa A.C. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC): When good intentions go awry. Cell Immunol., 2021, Vol. 362, 104302. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2021.104302.
  11. Shardina K., Timganova V., Bochkova M., Uzhviyuk S.. Generation of human myeloid-derived suppressor сells from CD11b+ Cells in vitro. In: Isaeva, E., Rocha, Á. (eds) Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century – Innovations and Technologies in Interdisciplinary Applications. Perm Forum 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2023, Vol 622. Springer, Cham.
  12. Umansky V., Blattner C., Gebhardt C., Utikal J. The role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in cancer progression. Vaccines, 2016, Vol. 4, no. 4, 36. doi: 10.3390/vaccines4040036.
  13. Ungefroren H., Fändrich F. The programmable cell of monocytic origin (PCMO): a potential adult stem/progenitor cell source for the generation of islet cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 2010, Vol. 654, pp. 667-682.
  14. Youn J.I., Kumar V., Collazo M., Nefedova Yu., Condamine T., Cheng P., Villagra A., Antonia S., McCaffrey J.C., Fishman M., Sarnaik A., Horna P., Sotomayor E., Gabrilovich D.I. Epigenetic silencing of retinoblastoma gene regulates pathologic differentiation of myeloid cells in cancer. Nat. Immunol., 2013, Vol. 14, pp. 211-220.
  15. Zhang W., Li J., Qi G., Tu G., Yang C., Xu M. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in transplantation: the dawn of cell therapy. J. Transl. Med., 2018, Vol. 16, 19. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1395-9.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1. Percentage of M-MDSCs from the total population of MDSCs derived from CD14+ cells

Download (51KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Timganova V.P., Shardina K.Y., Bochkova M.S., Usanina D.I., Zamorina S.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies