Cellular immune response to DNA vaccine encoding receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 S protein: dependence on the packing mode

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Massive vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 appears to be one of the most important steps towards solving the problem of the COVID-19 pandemic, which threatened the lives of millions of people over two and a half years. To create anti-COVID-19 vaccines, both traditional approaches (inactivated vaccines), and innovative efforts were used, including the nucleic acid-based vaccines (mRNA, DNA vaccines) which appeared on the market. We constructed a plasmid (DNA vaccine) encoding the gene for the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike protein (S) of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This DNA vaccine was named pVAXrbd. The polycationic carrier polyglucin-spermidine (PGS) and its recombinant RBD protein conjugate (PGS-RBD) were used to package pVAXrbd. By adding the negatively charged DNA pVAXrbd plasmid to polycationic PGS or PGS-RBD molecules, the complexes of polymers with plasmid DNA were formed by self-assembly, due to their non-covalent interaction. The aim of this work was to study cellular response induced by the DNA vaccine at various packaging options, as well as to analyze influence of the vaccine packaging upon development of the immune response. BALB/c mice were injected with DNA vaccine in three versions: “naked” pVAXrbd; plasmid pVAXrbd in PGS envelope; pVAXrbd in PGS-RBD wrapper. In control group, the animals were injected with the recombinant RBD protein. Cellular response was assessed by the IFNγ production using two methods, i.e., ELISpot and ICS using flow cytometry. It was shown that the DNA vaccine pVAXrbd, both per se, or as part of complexes, showed the ability to induce cellular immune response. The most effective cellular immune response was found in the group of animals immunized with pVAXrbd-PGS complex. Using ELISpot detection technique for this group, the largest number of cells responding by IFNγ release was registered upon stimulation with specific peptides; usage of ICS and flow cytometry for evaluation in this group showed higher percentage of IFNγ-producing CD4+ and CD8+T cells. This observed effect could be explained by DNA protection from nuclease action by the polyglucin-spermidine envelope. The pVAXrbd-PGS complexes may be also more efficiently recognized by antigen-presenting cells than naked plasmid DNA. The presented results show that the polyglucin-spermidine envelope provides an increase in immunogenicity of the DNA vaccine pVAXrbd, in terms of virus-specific T cell response.

About the authors

Mariya B. Borgoyakova

State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”

Author for correspondence.
Email: borgoyakova_mb@vector.nsc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0768-1561
SPIN-code: 8588-7391
Scopus Author ID: 57221732585

Junior Research Associate, Center of Genomic Studies in Biological Safety

Russian Federation, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk Region, 630559

Larisa I. Karpenko

State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”

Email: karpenko@vector.nsc.ru

PhD, MD (Biology), Associate Professor, Leading Research Associate, Center of Genomic Studies in Biological Safety

Russian Federation, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk Region, 630559

Ekaterina V. Starostina

State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”

Email: starostina_ev@vector.nsc.ru

PhD (Biology), Research Associate, Center of Genomic Studies in Biological Safety

Russian Federation, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk Region, 630559

Ekaterina A. Volosnikova

State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”

Email: volosnikova_ea@vector.nsc.ru

PhD (Biology), Leading Research Associate, Center of Genomic Studies in Biological Safety

Russian Federation, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk Region, 630559

Alexey M. Zadorozhny

State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”

Email: zadorozhnyy_am@vector.nsc.ru

Research Trainee, Center of Genomic Studies in Biological Safety

Russian Federation, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk Region, 630559

Lyubov A. Orlova

State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”

Email: orlova_la@vector.nsc.ru

Postgraduate Student, Research Trainee, Center of Genomic Studies in Biological Safety

Russian Federation, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk Region, 630559

Alexander A. Ilyichev

State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology “Vector”

Email: ilyichev@vector.nsc.ru

PhD, MD (Biology), Professor, Head, Department of Bioengineering, Center of Genomic Studies in Biological Safety

Russian Federation, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk Region, 630559

References

  1. Ahn J.Y., Lee J., Suh Y.S., Song Y.G., Choi Y.J., Lee K.H., Seo S.H., Song M., Oh J.W., Kim M., Seo H.Y., Kwak J.E., Youn J.W., Woo J.W., Shin E.C., Sung Y.C., Park S.H., Choi J.Y. Safety and immunogenicity of two recombinant DNA COVID-19 vaccines containing the coding regions of the spike or spike and nucleocapsid proteins: an interim analysis of two open-label, non-randomised, phase 1 trials in healthy adults. Lancet Microbe, 2022, Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. e173-e183.
  2. Borgoyakova M.B., Karpenko L.I., Rudometov A.P., Shanshin D.V., Isaeva A.A., Nesmeyanova V.S., Volkova N.V., Belenkaya S.V., Murashkin D.E., Shcherbakov D.N., Volosnikova E.A., Starostina E.V., Orlova L.A., Danilchenko N.V., Zaikovskaya A.V., Pyankov O.V., Ilyichev A.A. Immunogenic properties of the DNA construct encoding the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Mol. Biol. (Mosk.), 2021, Vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 987-998.
  3. Borgoyakova M.B., Karpenko L.I., Rudometov A.P., Volosnikova E.A., Merkuleva I.A., Starostina E.V., Zadorozhny A.M., Isaeva A.A., Nesmeyanova V.S., Shanshin D.V., Baranov K.O., Volkova N.V., Zaitsev B.N., Orlova L.A., Zaykovskaya A.V., Pyankov O.V., Danilenko E.D., Bazhan S.I., Shcherbakov D.N., Taranin A.V., Ilyichev A.A. Self-assembled particles combining SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein and RBD DNA vaccine induce synergistic enhancement of the humoral response in mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2022, Vol. 23, no. 4, 2188. doi: 10.3390/ijms23042188.
  4. Kraynyak K.A., Blackwood E., Agnes J., Tebas P., Giffear M., Amante D., Reuschel E.L., Purwar M., Christensen-Quick A., Liu N., Andrade V.M., Diehl M.C., Wani S., Lupicka M., Sylvester A., Morrow M.P., Pezzoli P., McMullan T., Kulkarni A.J., Zaidi F.I., Frase D., Liaw K., Smith T.R.F., Ramos S.J., Ervin J., Adams M., Lee J., Dallas M., Shah Brown A., Shea J.E., Kim J.J., Weiner D.B., Broderick K.E., Humeau L.M., Boyer J.D., Mammen M.P. SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine INO-4800 induces durable immune responses capable of being boosted in a phase 1 open-label trial. J. Infect. Dis., 2022, jiac016. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac016.
  5. Lagunas-Rangel F.A., Chávez-Valencia V. What do we know about the antibody responses to SARSCoV-2? Immunobiology, 2021, Vol. 226, no. 2, 152054. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2021.152054.
  6. Mallapaty S. India’s DNA COVID vaccine is a world first – more are coming. Nature, 2021, Vol. 597, pp. 161-162.
  7. Mathew D., Giles J.R., Baxter A.E., Oldridge D.A., Greenplate A.R., Wu J.E., Alanio C., Kuri-Cervantes L., Pampena M.B., D’Andrea K., Manne S., Chen Z., Huang Y.J., Reilly J.P., Weisman A.R., Ittner C.A.G., Kuthuru O., Dougherty J., Nzingha K., Han N., Kim J., Pattekar A., Goodwin E.C., Anderson E.M., Weirick M.E., Gouma S., Arevalo C.P., Bolton M.J., Chen F., Lacey S.F., Ramage H., Cherry S., Hensley S.E., Apostolidis S.A., Huang A.C., Vella L.A.; UPenn COVID Processing Unit, Betts M.R., Meyer N.J., Wherry E.J. Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications. Science, 2020, Vol. 369, no. 6508, eabc8511. doi: 10.1126/science.abc8511
  8. Merkuleva I.A., Shcherbakov D.N., Borgoyakova M.B., Shanshin D.V., Rudometov A.P., Karpenko L.I., Belenkaya S.V., Isaeva A.A., Nesmeyanova V.S., Kazachinskaia E.I., Volosnikova E.A., Esina T.I., Zaykovskaya A.V., Pyankov O.V., Borisevich S.S., Shelemba A.A., Chikaev A.N., Ilyichev A.A. Comparative immunogenicity of the recombinant receptor-binding domain of protein S SARS-CoV-2 obtained in prokaryotic and mammalian expression systems. Vaccines (Basel), 2022. Vol. 10, no. 1, 96. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10010096.
  9. Momin T., Kansagra K., Patel H., Sharma S., Sharma B., Patel J., Mittal R., Sanmukhani J., Maithal K., Dey A., Chandra H., Rajanathan C.T., Pericherla H.P., Kumar P., Narkhede A., Parmar D. Safety and immunogenicity of a DNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (ZyCoV-D): Results of an open-label, non-randomized phase I part of phase I/II clinical study by intradermal route in healthy subjects in India. EClinicalMedicine, 2021, Vol. 38, 101020. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101020.
  10. Sekine T., Perez-Potti A., Rivera-Ballesteros O., Strålin K., Gorin J.B., Olsson A., Llewellyn-Lacey S., Kamal H., Bogdanovic G., Muschiol S., Wullimann D.J., Kammann T., Emgård J., Parrot T., Folkesson E., Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group, Rooyackers O., Eriksson L.I., Henter J.I., Sönnerborg A., Allander T., Albert J., Nielsen M., Klingström J., Gredmark-Russ S., Björkström N.K., Sandberg J.K., Price D.A., Ljunggren H.G., Aleman S., Buggert M. Robust T cell immunity in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19. Cell, 2020, Vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 158-168.e14.
  11. Simões R.S.Q., Rodríguez-Lázaro D. Classical and next-generation vaccine platforms to SARS-CoV-2: biotechnological strategies and genomic variants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, Vol. 19, no. 4. 2392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042392.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1. Number of splenocytes producing IFNγ in response to specific stimulation, per 106 cells, determined using ELISpot. Note. On the left, data are presented as means ± standard deviation. On the right is a typical spot view for each group of the immunized animals.

Download (263KB)
3. Figure 2. Percentage of SARS-CoV-2-specific IFNγ-producing CD4+ and CD8+T cells determined by ICS using flow cytometry. Note. The graphs were created with GraphPad Prism 8.0 software, the data are presented as a spread of values from minimum to maximum with the designation of the average values.

Download (133KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Borgoyakova M.B., Karpenko L.I., Starostina E.V., Volosnikova E.A., Zadorozhny A.M., Orlova L.A., Ilyichev A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies