Theoretical Study of Charge Transfer between a Metal Surface and a Hydrogen Atom in the Excited p-State
- Авторлар: Moskalenko S.1, Gainullin I.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Moscow State University
- Шығарылым: № 1 (2023)
- Беттер: 103-111
- Бөлім: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1028-0960/article/view/137667
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1028096022110152
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BKJIQJ
- ID: 137667
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
Some features of the charge transfer between ions and the metal surface, which are due to its atomic structure, were numerically investigated. The simulation was based on a three-dimensional implementation of the wave packet propagation method. The studied system consisted of an Al(110) metal surface and an excited hydrogen atom with an electron in the p-state, which does not have spherical symmetry. When considering a model static problem, it was shown that electron exchange is more efficient when the symmetry axis of the p-orbital was oriented perpendicular to the Al surface, rather than parallel. Also, analysis of the obtained data showed that the time dependence of the atomic population function has an exponential decay. The solution of the “dynamic” problem showed that for an excited hydrogen atom moving along the metal surface, the electron exchange does not depend on the orientation of the p-orbital symmetry axis with respect to the direction of motion of the atom. The study of the dynamics of the charge transfer with a metal surface made it possible to observe for p-orbitals, the symmetry axis of which was directed parallel to the metal surface, the separation of the electron density passing to the surface into two parts, which diverge relative to the p-orbital symmetry plane.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
S. Moskalenko
Moscow State University
Email: ivan.gainullin@physics.msu.ru
Russia, 119992, Moscow
I. Gainullin
Moscow State University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ivan.gainullin@physics.msu.ru
Russia, 119992, Moscow
Әдебиет тізімі
- Hutchings G.J., Haruta M. // Appl. Catal. A. 2005. V. 291. P. 2. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.05.044
- Lai X., Clair T.P.St., Valden M., Goodman D.W. // Prog. Surf. Sci. 1998. V. 59. P. 25. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6816(98)00034-3
- Lai X., Clair T.P.St., Goodman D.W. // Faraday Discuss. 1999. V. 114. P. 279. https://www.doi.org/10.1039/A902795E
- Bacal M., Wada M. // Appl. Phys. Rev. 2015. V. 2. P. 021305. https://www.doi.org/10.1063/1.4921298
- Gainullin I.K. // Surf. Sci. 2018. V. 677. P. 324. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2018.08.007
- Usman E.Yu., Urazgil’din I.F., Borisov A.G., Gauyacq J.P. // Phys. Rev. B. 2001. V. 64. P. 205405. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.205405
- Amanbaev E.R., Shestakov D.K., Gainullin I.K. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2009. V. 3. P. 865. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S1027451009060032
- Magunov A.A., Shestakov D.K., Gainullin I.K., Urazgil’din I.F. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2008. V. 2. P. 764. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S1027451008050170
- Gainullin I.K., Usman E.Yu., Song Y.W., Urazgil’din I.F. // Vacuum. 2003. V. 72. P. 263. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2003.07.001
- Zykova E.Y., Khaidarov A.A., Ivanenko I.P., Gainullin I.K. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2012. V. 6. P. 877. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S102745101211016X
- Klavsyuk A.L., Kolesnikov S.V., Gainullin I.K., Saletsky A.M. // Eur. Phys. J. B. 2012. V. 85. P. 331. https://www.doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2012-30352-3
- Amanbaev E.R., Gainullin I.K., Zykova E.Yu., Urazgildin I.F. // Thin Solid Films. 2011. V. 519. P. 4737. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.026
- Obreshkov B., Thumm U. // Phys. Rev. A. 2013. V. 87. P. 022903. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.022903
- Bryukvina L.I., Lipko S.V., Martynovich E.F. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2013. V. 7. № 4. P. 617. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S1027451013040071
- Stueckelberg E.C.G. // Helvetica Physica Acta. 1932. V. 5. P. 369.
- Gainullin I.K. // UFN. 2020. V. 63. P. 888. https://www.doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.2019.11.038691.
- Yin C., Guo Z., Gellman A.J. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2020. V. 124. P. 10605. https://www.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02058
- Bruckner B., Bauer P., Primetzhofer D. // Surf. Sci. 2020. V. 691. P. 121491. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2019.121491
- Oohara W., Kaji T., Hirose K. et al. // AIP Advances. 2020. V. 10. P. 095006. https://www.doi.org/10.1063/5.0020697
- Oohara W., Fujii M., Watai M., Hiraoka Y., Egawa M., Morinaga Y., Takamori S., Yoshida M. // AIP Advances. 2019. V. 9. P. 085303. https://www.doi.org/10.1063/1.5109805
- Gao L., Zhu Y., Shi Y., Liu P., Xiao Y., Li G., Liu Y., Esaulov V.A., Chen X., Chen L., Guo Y. // Phys. Rev. A. 2017. V. 96. P. 052705. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.052705
- Shaw J., Zhang Y., Doerr D., Chakraborty H., Monismith D. // Phys. Rev. A. 2019. V. 98. P. 052705. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.052705
- Shaw J., Monismith D., Zhang Y., Doerr D., Chakra- borty H.S. // Atoms. 2020. V. 7. P. 89. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/atoms7030089
- Iglesias-García A., Romero M.A., García E.A., Goldberg E.C. // Phys. Rev. B. 2020. V. 102. P. 115406. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.115406
- Liu J. et al. // Phys. Rev. A. 2020. V. 101. P. 032706. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.032706
- Xiao Y., Shi Y., Liu P., Zhu Y., Gao L., Guo Y., Chen L., Chen X., Esaulov V. // Nucl. Instum. Methods. Phys. Res. B. 2019. V. 450. P. 73. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2018.11.022
- Mamedov N.V., Mamedov I.M. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys. 2020. V. 84 P. 713. https://www.doi.org/10.3103/S1062873820060155
- Balakshin Y.V., Kozhemiako A.V., Evseev A.P., Minnebaev D.K., Elsehly E.M. // Moscow University Phys. Bull. 2020. V. 75. P. 218. https://www.doi.org/10.3103/S0027134920030030
- Shemukhin A.A., Smirnov A.M., Evseev A.P., Vorobyeva E.A., Kozhemiako A.V., Minnebaev D.K., Balakshin Y.V., Nazarov A.V., Chernysh V.S. // Moscow University Phys. Bull. 2020. V. 75. P. 133. https://www.doi.org/10.3103/S0027134920020113
- Sereda I., Tseluyko A., Ryabchikov D., Hrechko Y., Azarenkov N. // Vacuum. 2019. V. 162. P. 163. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.01.046
- Aleksandrov A.F., Gainullin I.K., Sonkin M.A. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech.2020. V. 14. P. 791. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S1027451020040205
- Gainullin I.K. // Moscow University Phys. Bull. 2019. V. 74. P. 585. https://www.doi.org/10.3103/S0027134919060158
- Majorosi S., Czirják A. // Comp. Phys. Comm. 2016. V. 208. P. 9. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.07.006
- Fu Y., Zeng J., Yuan J. // Comp. Phys. Comm. 2017. V. 210. P. 181. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.09.016
- Lüdde H.J., Horbatsch M., Kirchner T. // Eur. Phys. J. B. 2018. V. 91. P. 99. https://www.doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2018-90165-x
- Zhou S.P., Liu A.H., Liu F.C., Wang C.C., Ding D.J. // Chinese Phys. B. 2019. V. 28. P. 083101. https://www.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/28/8/083101
- Liu Q., Liu F., Hou C. // Procedia Computer Sci. 2020. V. 171. P. 312. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.032
- Gainullin I.K., Klavsyuk A.L. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2012. V. 76. P. 542. https://www.doi.org/10.3103/S1062873812050115
- Riascos V.Q. et al. // Phys. Rev. A. 2021. V. 103. № 6. P. 062805. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.062805
- Fu-Ming T. et al. // Acta Physica Sinica. 2020. V. 69. № 23. P. 234202. https://www.doi.org/10.7498/aps.69.20200700
- Wang L., Sun G., Liu X. et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. B. 2021. V. 497. P. 10. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2021.03.022
- Salvo C., Karmakar P., Yarmoff J. // Phys. Rev. B. 2018. V. 98. P. 035437. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035437
- Urazgil’din I.F. // Phys. Rev. B. 1993. V. 47. P. 4139. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.4139
- Tolstogouzov A., Daolio S., Pagura C. // Surf. Sci. 1999. V. 441. P. 213. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028(99)00881-X
- Elovikov S.S., Zykova E.Yu., Mosunov A.S. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2002. V. 66. P. 558.
- Mashkova E.S. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. B. 2003. V. 212. P. 164.
- Zinoviev A.N., Babenko P.Y., Meluzova D.S., Shergin A.P. // JETP Letters. 2018. V. 108. P. 633.
- Brongersma H.H., Draxler M., de Ridder M., Bauer P. // Surf. Sci. 2007. V. 62. P. 63.
- He X., Zhou W., Wang Z.Y., Zhang Y.N., Shi J., Wu R.Q., Yarmoff J.A. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013. V. 110. P. 156101.
- Souda R., Ayzawa T., Hayami W., Otani S., Ishizawa Y. // Phys. Rev. B. 1990. V. 42. P. 7761. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.7761
- Gainullin I.K., Usman E.Yu., Song Y.W., Urazgil’din I.F. // Vacuum. 2004. V. 72. P. 263.
- Gainullin I.K., Usman E.Y., Urazgil’din I.F. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2005. V. 232. P. 22.
- Gainullin I.K., Urazgildin I.F. // Phys. Rev. B. 2006. V. 74. № 20. P. 205403.
- Shestakov D.K., Polivnikova T.Yu., Gainullin I.K., Urazgildin I.F. // Nuclear Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2009. V. 267. P. 2596.
- Gainullin I.K. // Surf. Sci. 2019. V. 681. P. 158.
- Гайнуллин И.К. // Вестник МГУ. Серия 3. Физика. Астрономия. 2019. №. 5. С. 67.
- Gainullin I.K. // Phys. Rev. A. 2019. V. 100. P. 032712.
- Гайнуллин И.К. // Успехи физических наук. Т. 190. С. 950. https://www.doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.2019.11.038691.
- Martynenko Yu.V. // Rad. Eff. Defects. Solids. 1973. V. 20. P. 211.
- Winter H. // Phys. Rep. 2002. V. 367. P. 387.
- Los J., Geerlings J.J.C. // Phys. Rep. 1990. V. 190. P. 133.
- Canario A.R. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2005. V. 71. № 12. P. 121401.
- Ermoshin V.A., Kazansky A.K. // Phys. Lett. A. 1996. V. 218. P. 99.
- Gainullin I.K., Sonkin M.A. // Phys. Rev. A. 2015. V. 92. P. 022710.
- Gainullin I.K., Sonkin M.A. // Computer Phys. Commun. 2015. V. 188. P. 68.
- Gainullin I.K. // Computer Phys. Commun. 2017. V. 210. P. 72.
- Gainullin I.K. // Phys. Rev. A. 2017. V. 95. № 5. P. 052705.
- Jennings P.J., Jones R.O., Weinert M. // Phys. Rev. B. 1988. V. 37. P. 6113.
- Chulkov E.V., Silkin V.M., Echenique P.M. // Surf. Sci. 1999. V. 437. P. 330.