Forensic expert activity in the system of scientific and technical support of criminal proceedings

封面

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article presents the results of the analysis and critical assessment of the history of development and the current state of forensic and forensic activities as the most important elements of the system of scientific and technical support of criminal proceedings; their rational and promising organization in the Investigative Committee of Russia is noted; the reasons for their departmental separations, respectively, in the Ministry of Justice of Russia and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, characterized by lengthy discussions and the adoption of questionable organizational and legal decisions; a set of principles has been formulated that the specified system should meet, as well as a list of projected organizational and legal measures aimed at its formation and organization of functioning.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Aleksandr Volynsky

Kikot’ Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; Sukharev Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: prmosu@mvd.ru

Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of Criminology, Professor of the Department of Forensic Expertise and Operational Investigative Activitie

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow

参考

  1. Belkin R. S. The history of domestic criminology. M., 1999 (in Russ.).
  2. Volynsky A. F. On the centenary of the forensic service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia: the unlearned lessons of history // Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019. No. 4 (52). Pp. 90–100 (in Russ.).
  3. Volynsky A. F. Scientific and technical support of criminal proceedings: the experience of the past, the problems of the present day and a look into the future: materials scientific-practical Conference “Inter-polytech-2022”. M., 2022 (in Russ.).
  4. Volynsky A. F. The subject of criminology and “scientific separatism”: consequences and possibilities of their overcoming // Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018. No. 1 (45). Pp. 175–185 (in Russ.).
  5. Volynsky A. F. The Republic of Belarus has reformed the system of forensic institutions. And Russia? // Theory and practice of forensic examination in modern conditions. M., 2015 (in Russ.).
  6. Volynsky A. F. Forensic examination before the “court of history” (conclusion of a specialist) // Forensic examination and research. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 26–36 (in Russ.).
  7. Volynsky A. F. Forensic examination: systemic problems require systemic approaches to their solution: collection of materials of the International Forum on June 7–8, 2017. M., 2017. Pp. 78–85 (in Russ.).
  8. Volynsky A. F. Expertise and special scientific and technical research on the new Criminal Procedure Code of the Socialist Republic of Romania // Soviet Justice. 1970. No. 24. Pp. 25, 26 (in Russ.).
  9. Kardashevskaya M. V. The concept of forensic activity and its relationship with criminalistics and forensic examination // Disclosure and investigation of crimes: science, practice, experience. M., 2020. Pp. 35–43 (in Russ.).
  10. Koldaev V. M. From the history of practical criminology in Russia: the application of scientific methods of work in the search and investigation of crimes: facts, documents, comments. M., 2005. Pp. 52–74 (in Russ.).
  11. Krylov I. F. Essays on criminology and forensic examination. L., 1975 (in Russ.).
  12. Technical and forensic support of crime investigation / ed. by A. M. Bagmet. M., 2015 (in Russ.).
  13. Khrustalev V. N. How to ensure the reliability of evidence obtained by expert means? // Forensic examination. 2016. Iss. 3 (47). Pp. 156–171 (in Russ.).

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024
##common.cookie##