Email this article Unification of the civil process as a factor in reducing the burden on the budgetary system of the Russian Federation
- Authors: Chucha S.Y.1, Sorokin V.P.2
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow
- Issue: No 8 (2025)
- Pages: 48-56
- Section: Court, prosecutor’s office, bar, notarial system
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1026-9452/article/view/308085
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945225080052
- ID: 308085
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The article examines the optimization and unification of the civil process from the point of view of protecting the interests of the state in the budgetary sphere. Trends in the optimization of the process in Russia are identified. The current and most promising areas for the unification of the development of the civil process in order to reduce the burden on the state budget system are proposed: improvement and development of simplified forms of dispute resolution; exclusion of evasion of payment of state duty; elimination of duplicating functions at the stage of execution of judicial acts, etc. The need to increase the efficiency of the civil process is substantiated by systematically being guided by the criteria for ensuring the fulfillment of the main task of the court – the correct and timely resolution of disputes and saving budget funds necessary to ensure the optimal functioning of the judicial.
About the authors
S. Y. Chucha
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: chuchaigpan@gmail.com
10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow, Russia
V. P. Sorokin
Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow
Email: sor.vladislav2013@yandex.ru
17 B. Tulskaya str., 115225 Moscow, Russia
References
- Borisova L. V., Letova N. V., Sokolova T. V. et al. Review of the international scientific conference “Civilistic anniversaries” dedicated to the centenary of N. S. Malein “Legal responsibility and justice in the digital environment” // State and Law. 2021. No. 7. Pp. 190–196 (in Russ.).
- Vinogradova E. V. The antithesis of universally recognized principles and norms and state constitutional identity in the modern polycentric system of international relations // Proceedings of the IGP RAS. 2023. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 28–40 (in Russ.).
- Galuzo V. N. On some problems of the legal regulation of evidence in civil proceedings // International Journal of Civil and Commercial Law. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 39–43 (in Russ.).
- Efremova N. N. The court in the modern state: traditional values and current problems of the organization of justice // Proceedings of the IGP RAS. 2016. No. 1. Pp. 81– 89 (in Russ.).
- Zhuikov V. M. General concept of the development of procedural legislation and legislation on the judicial system // Journal of Russ. law. 2010. No. 7. Pp. 5–17 (in Russ.).
- Zorkin V. D. Speech of the Chairman of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation at the X All-Russian Congress of Judges // Judge. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 9–11 (in Russ.).
- Institutions for the protection of state interests in the field of civil jurisdiction / ed. by E. V. Mikhailova. M., 2024 (in Russ.).
- Laptev V. A., Solovyanenko N. I. Electronic justice. Electronic document management: scientific and practical manual / ed. by S. Yu. Chucha. M., 2019. Pp. 7–18 (in Russ.).
- Letova N. V. Measures of social support for labor veterans: features of protection of rights in appointment and loss // State and Law. 2025. No. 6. Pp. 109–119 (in Russ.).
- Letova N. V. Features of protection of the rights of labor veterans when assigning them separate social benefits // Law. 2024. No. 6. Pp. 171–177 (in Russ.).
- Letova N. V. Features of the legal personality of children // State and Law. 2023. No. 10. Pp. 125–132 (in Russ.).
- Malikov S. V., Chucha S. Yu. Intersectoral protection of labor and social rights in the context of social transformation (review of the International Scientific and Practical Conference) // State and Law. 2024. No. 2. Pp. 207–213 (in Russ.).
- Mikhailova E. V. Prerequisites for the right to file a claim: the current state // State and Law. 2023. No. 8. Pp. 24–34 (in Russ.).
- Mikhailova E. V., Letova N. V., Solovyanenko N. I. et al. Judicial and non-judicial protection of civil, family and labor rights in the context of globalization and digitalization of the state and society // State and Law. 2022. No. 9. Pp. 66–74 (in Russ.).
- Putin V. V. Speech of the President of the Russian Federation at the X All-Russian Congress of Judges // Judge. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 3, 4 (in Russ.).
- Savenkov A. N. The global crisis of modernity as a subject of Philosophy of Law // State and Law. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 5–19 (in Russ.).
- Solovyanenko N. I. Problems of realization and protection of the rights of participants in economic relations in the context of digital inequality // State and Law. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 188–193 (in Russ.).
- Judicial power in the system of protection of the rights of the individual and the state / ed. by E. V. Mikhailova, A. A. Solovyov, I. I. Butrim. M., 2024. P. 20 (in Russ.).
- Chucha S. Yu. To reduce the burden on the court, simplified procedures are not enough, active use of mediation and introduction of electronic enforcement proceedings // Moscow Lawyer. 2012. No. 3. Pp. 6–11 (in Russ.).
- Chucha S. Yu. Public and private guarantees of wage protection in case of employer insolvency // Public and private principles of legal regulation in a modern welfare state / ed. by A. V. Egorov, T. S. Taranova (chief editors). Minsk, 2024. Pp. 28–33 (in Russ.).
- Chucha S. Remote work as a method of labor protection in periods of public hazard // Supremacy of law. 2021. No 2. Pp. 141–150. doi: 10.52388/2345-1971.2021.e2.12
Supplementary files
