The subject of law as a formall-ydogmatic model of human in legal reality: anthropological and legal analysis

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the subject of law as a formal-dogmatic model of a person in legal reality. The process of the doctrinal formation of the subject-legal model is traced, four methodological transitions in the legal view of the subject of law are distinguished. The importance of an anthropological and legal approach to understanding a person and his behavior in modern legal reality is substantiated. The anthropological and legal approach is based on the idea, that law is inherently human phenomenon, the main goal and value of which is the person himself, and not his subject-legal model. In this regard, it is proposed to recognize the official nature of legal-conceptual design in relation to the teachings of a person in law. Despite the fact that the formal-defense method underlies the legal regulation of social relations and the legal means created with its help are a guarantee for a person as the main legal value, nevertheless, it is a person, and not his legal structure, is a central element of legal reality and legal system. To know the anthropological and legal properties of a person and their use in legal regulation, an additional level of legal representation of legal personality in relation to the formal-defendant is proposed.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vadim I. Pavlov

National Center for Legislation and Legal Research of the Republic of Belarus

Author for correspondence.
Email: vadim_pavlov@tut.by
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2867-1039

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

Belarus, Minsk

References

  1. Arkhipov S. I. The subject of law: a theoretical study. SPb., 2004. Pp. 25–123, 291 (in Russ.).
  2. Bratus S. N. Subjects of Civil Law. M., 1950. P. 6 (in Russ.).
  3. Vasev I. N. Subjective law as a general theoretical category. M., 2012. Pp. 152–155, 163 (in Russ.).
  4. Vedeneev Yu. A. Jurisprudence: phenomenon and concept. Introduction to the genealogy of the language of conceptual paradigms. M., 2022 (in Russ.).
  5. Vitruk N. V. General theory of the legal status of personality. M., 2008. Pp. 23–26, 43, 193 (in Russ.).
  6. Voevodin L. D. The legal status of personality in Russia. M., 1997. Pp. 12, 29, 31–38 (in Russ.).
  7. Gadzhiev G. A. Ontology of law: (a critical study of the legal concept of reality). M., 2013. P. 16 (in Russ.).
  8. Gadzhiev G. A., Voynikanis E. A. Can a robot be a subject of law (search for legal norms to regulate the digital economy)? // Law. HSE Journal. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 24–48 (in Russ.).
  9. Gorban V. S. Why is the Philosophy of Law today? // Theory and practice of social development. 2018. No. 12 (130). Pp. 99–103 (in Russ.).
  10. Dozhdev D. V. Roman Private Law: textbook // under the general editorship of V. S. Nersesyants. 3rd ed., rev. and add. M., 2011. Pp. 290, 291 (in Russ.).
  11. Zhukov V. I. Anthropology in the Philosophy of Law: statement of the problem // State and Law. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 61–73 (in Russ.).
  12. Kelsen G. Pure doctrine of law. 2nd ed. SPb., 2015. P. 219 (in Russ.).
  13. Kovler A. I. Anthropology of law: textbook for universities. M., 2002 (in Russ.).
  14. Kofanov L. L. Priestly colleges in Early Rome. On the question of the formation of Roman sacred and public law. M., 2001 (in Russ.).
  15. Kofanov L. L. Persona and persona publica in republican Rome // Ancient law. 2010. No. 1 (25). P. 40 (in Russ.).
  16. Kuchinsky V. A. Personality, freedom, law. M., 1978. P. 133 (in Russ.).
  17. Lapaeva V. V. Libertarian-legal dogmatics as a factor in improving the quality and effectiveness of legal regulation // Effectiveness of legal regu-lation / under the general editorship of A. V. Polyakov, V. V. Denisenko, M. A. Belyaeva. M., 2017. Pp. 40–69 (in Russ.).
  18. “Leon and Konstantin Varna Tsar”: the Old Russian text of the Eclogue of laws // Shchapov Ya. N. The Byzantine “Eclogue of laws” in the Russian written tradition. SPb., 2011. Pp. 13–58 (in Russ.).
  19. Lipshits E. E. Law and court in Byzantium in the IV–VIII centuries. M., 1976. Pp. 59, 60 (in Russ.).
  20. Locke J. Two treatises on government // Locke J. Essays: in 3 vols. M., 1988. Pp. 263–265 (in Russ.).
  21. Matuzov N. I. The legal system and personality. Saratov, 1987. Pp. 48, 51–71 (in Russ.).
  22. Mitskevich A. V. Subjects of Soviet law. M., 1962. P. 4 (in Russ.).
  23. Montesquieu Sh. L. On the spirit of laws. M., 1999. P. 16 (in Russ.).
  24. Narbekov V. Nomocanon of Patriarch Photius of Constantinople with the interpretation of Valsamon. Kazan, 1899. Part 2 (in Russ.).
  25. Ovchinnikov A. I. Legal thinking in the hermeneutical paradigm. Rostov-on-Don, 2002 (in Russ.).
  26. Orzikh M. F. Personality and law. M., 1975 (in Russ.).
  27. Orzikh M. F. Law and personality: questions of the theory of legal influence on the personality of a socialist society. Kiev; Odessa, 1977 (in Russ.).
  28. Pavlov A. S. The original Slavic-Russian nomocanon. Kazan, 1869 (in Russ.).
  29. Pavlov V. I. Anthropology of law in the context of legal, philosophical and religious traditions: the history of formation. M., 2021. Pp. 37–168 (in Russ.).
  30. Pashentsev D. A. The subject of law enforcement in a digital society // The subject of law: stability and dynamics of legal status in the conditions of digitalization: collection of scientific works / under the general editorship of D. A. Pashentsev, M. V. Zaloilo. M., 2021. Pp. 58– 65 (in Russ.).
  31. Pokrovsky I. A. Abstract and concrete man in the face of Civil Law (Prolegomena for the upcoming discussion of the draft law of obligations) // Herald of Civil Law. 1913. No. 4. Pp. 32, 33, 49 (in Russ.).
  32. Polyakov A. V. Human rights and state sovereignty // Postclassical ontology of law / under the general editorship of I. L. Chestnov. SPb., 2016. Pp. 305–310 (in Russ.).
  33. Ponomareva E. V. The phenomenon of quasi-subject of law: questions of theory. M., 2020. Pp. 7–25, 33–63 (in Russ.).
  34. Postclassical ontology of law / under the general editorship of I. L. Chestnov. SPb., 2016 (in Russ.).
  35. Puchkov O. A. Anthropological comprehension of law. Yekaterinburg, 1999 (in Russ.).
  36. Pyatkov D. V. Positions of domestic civilists on the definition of the concept of “natural person”: retrospectives and modernity // Izvestiya AltGU. Legal sciences. 2018. No. 6 (104). Pp. 190, 191 (in Russ.).
  37. Radbrukh G. Philosophy of Law. M., 2004. P. 147 (in Russ.).
  38. Sociocultural anthropology of law / ed. by N. A. Isaev, I. L. Chestnov. SPb., 2015 (in Russ.).
  39. Social anthropology of law of modern society / ed. by I. L. Chestnov. SPb., 2006 (in Russ.).
  40. Spectorsky E. V. The problem of social physics in the XVII century: in 2 vols. SPb., 2006. Vol. 2. P. 53 (in Russ.).
  41. Stepanov S. K. Deconstruction of legal personality or the place of artificial intelligence in law // Digital Law. 2021. No. 2 (2). Pp. 14–30 (in Russ.).
  42. Strogovich M. S. The main issues of Soviet socialist legality. M., 1966. P. 156 (in Russ.).
  43. The subject of law: stability and dynamics of legal status in the conditions of digitalization: collection of scientific works / under the general editorship of D. A. Pashentsev, M. V. Zaloilo. M., 2021 (in Russ.).
  44. Troyanos S. N. The concept of “icononomiya” in Byzantine law (taking into account modern Greek canonistics) // Theological works. 2012. Iss. 43–44. Pp. 485–501 (in Russ.).
  45. Khalfina R. O. The general doctrine of legal relations. M., 1974. Pp. 123, 124 (in Russ.).
  46. Khvostova K. V. Proniya: socio-economic and legal problems // Byzantine vremennik. 1988. Vol. 49. P. 13 (in Russ.).
  47. Cherdantsev A. F. Logical-linguistic phenomena in jurisprudence. M., 2015. P. 220 (in Russ.).
  48. Cheremisinova M. E. The legal status of subjects in virtual space. M., 2020 (in Russ.).
  49. Chestnov I. L. Postclassical theory of law. SPb., 2012. Pp. 386–406 (in Russ.).
  50. Shershenevich G. F. General theory of law. M., 1910. P. 575 (in Russ.).
  51. Eclogue: Byzantine legislative code VIII century / introductory article, transl., comm. E. E. Lipshits. M., 1965 (in Russ.).
  52. Yampolskaya Ts. A. On the subjective rights of Soviet citizens and their guarantees // Questions of Soviet State Law. M., 1959. Pp. 187, 188 (in Russ.).
  53. Ecloga. Das Gesetzbuch Leons III und Konstantinos’ V. Herausgegeben von Ludwig Burgmann. Frankfurt-am-Main, 1983.
  54. Franciosi G. Famiglia e persone in Roma antica: dall’eta arcaica al principato. 3 ed. Torino, 1995.
  55. Norbert R. Anthropologie juridique. 1re ed. Paris, 1988.
  56. Schlag P. The problem of the subject // Texas Law Review. 1991. Vol. 69. Pp. 1627–1743.

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies