Development of the judicial system as a subject research in post-non-classical science

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Social concern with issues of justice, objectivity, independence and effectiveness of justice has accompanied humanity since the time of the need to resolve disputes that arise by turning to a third independent judge. Much has been said about this in the writings of ancient authors during the existence of classical scientific rationality. In non-classical scientific rationality, this discourse acquires its specific characteristics, and the achievements of post-non-classical science objectify the need for further transformations in the judicial sphere, the legitimacy of justice. This is due to the fact that the structure of the judiciary is in a relationship of functional dependence on social systems as one of the substructures of state power, which has a huge impact on the economic, political, rule-making, cultural and moral spheres of social practice. For the judicial system at all times, the attributive properties are not only the continuity of its existence, but also the dynamism of its own structures or individual institutions, which at various stages of real existence are characterized by transformational changes, sometimes cardinal. In order to increase the efficiency of the social functioning of the judicial system, to meet its needs of legal development, it is necessary to generalize scientific ideas about judicial transformations as a real historical and legal phenomenon that accompanied the existence of state power. The article characterizes the essential features of the concepts “judicial system”, “judicial reforms”, “judicial reform”.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Valentina M. Bolshakova

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management – Branch)

Author for correspondence.
Email: valentinabolshakova@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7490-3443

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law Department

Russian Federation, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Gagarin Ave., 46

References

  1. Bolshakova V. M. The genesis of the formation and development of the judicial system of the Russian Federation in the late XX – early XXI century: institutional and regulatory characteristics // Law and politics. 2021. No. 3. Pp. 26–36 (in Russ.).
  2. Bolshakova V. M. Dynamics of judicial transformations in Russia in the second half of the XIX – early XXI century: historical and legal research / ed. by A. A. Demichev. Tambov, 2021. P. 89 (in Russ.).
  3. Bolshakova V. M. The concept of judicial transformations in Russia in the second half of the XIX – early XXI century (theoretical and legal, historical and structural and functional aspects) // Journal of Russ. law. 2022. Vol. 26. No. 4. Pp. 116–134 (in Russ.).
  4. Bolshakova V. M. Philosophical foundations of the application of the methodology of chronodiscrete monogeographic comparative jurisprudence // Actual problems and prospects of development of the scientific school of Chronodiscrete monogeographic comparative jurisprudence: collection of scientific works based on the materials of the Fourth All-Russian Scientific Conference, Nizhny Novgorod, November 17, 2021. N. Novgorod, 2021. Pp. 44–51 (in Russ.).
  5. Bolshakova V. M., Kholikov I. V. Dialectics of changeability and divisibility: notes on the criteria for periodization of judicial transformations in Russia in the second half of the XIX – early XXI century // Lex russica (Russian law). 2022. No. 3 (184). Pp. 142–159 (in Russ.).
  6. Vlasov V. I. Dialectics of stability and instability of society: on the example of Russian history // Ethnosocium and interethnic culture. 2016. No. 2 (92). Pp. 113–122 (in Russ.).
  7. Vlasov V. I., Abasov V. A. The theoretical basis of modern judicial reform in Russia (On the 30th anniversary of the adoption of the concept of judicial reform) // Herald of the Faculty of Law of the Southern Federal University. 2021. Vol. 8. No. 3. Pp. 9–14 (in Russ.).
  8. Vlasov V. I., Verichev K. B. Dynamics of development of judicial reform in Russia // Science and education: economy and economics; entrepreneurship; law and management. 2017. No. 6 (85). Pp. 57– 60 (in Russ.).
  9. Vlasov V. I., Vlasova G. B. The importance of judicial reform for the political and legal development of the state // Science and education: economy and economics; entrepreneurship; law and management. 2014. No. 11 (54). Pp. 19–22 (in Russ.).
  10. Grebennikov V. V., Grudtsyna L. Yu. Principles of organization and typologization of judicial systems // State and Law. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 102–106 (in Russ.).
  11. Demichev A. A. On the comparability of the judicial reform of 1864 and judicial transformations of the late twentieth – early XXI century in Russia // Historical and legal problems: a new perspective. 2014. No. 9–1. Pp. 7–14 (in Russ.).
  12. Demichev A. A. On scientific novelty in historical and legal research // Russ. Journal of Legal Studies. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 2 (7). Pp. 16–21 (in Russ.).
  13. Demichev A. A., Bolshakova V. M., Ilyukhina V. A. Periodization of the history of judicial transformations in Russia in the second half of the XIX–XXI centuries // History of the state and law. 2021. No. 5. Pp. 34–45 (in Russ.).
  14. Zhuikov V. M. The general concept of the development of procedural legislation and legislation on the judicial system // Journal of Russ. law. 2010. No. 7 (163). P. 5 (in Russ.).
  15. Isaev I. A. Metaphors of the Law: from “light” to “flame” // Lex russica (Russian law). 2021. Vol. 74. No. 6. Pp. 23–35 (in Russ.).
  16. Kleandrov M. I. Constitutionally significant imperfections of the judiciary in the Russian Federation // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. Vol. 88. No. 10. P. 886 (in Russ.).
  17. Kleandrov M. I. On the directions of improving the mechanism of judicial power in ensuring justice // State and Law. 2021. No. 3. P. 19 (in Russ.).
  18. Kleandrov M. I. On the need for a new judicial reform in Russia // Innovations in legal science and practice as a factor in harmonizing the relationship between personality, society and the state: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Novosibirsk, October 5–7, 2017. Novosibirsk, 2017. Pp. 10–13 (in Russ.).
  19. Kleandrov M. I. On the strategy for the development of the mechanism of judicial power in the Russian Federation // Russ. Justice. 2017. No. 10 (138). P. 33 (in Russ.).
  20. Klimenko A. I. Contexts of understanding the category of “social state” in legal science // Law and education. 2008. No. 11. Pp. 56– 61 (in Russ.).
  21. Kolokolov N. A. The state and the court: our reflections on some criteria of attractiveness and effectiveness // Herald of Economic Security. 2021. No. 4. Pp. 194–210 (in Russ.).
  22. Kolokolov N. A. Judicial construction: from the Industrial Age to the era of the second Modern // Herald of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2021. No. 6. Pp. 151, 152 (in Russ.).
  23. Kun T. The structure of scientific revolutions // Researcher / Researcher. 2010. No. 1–2 (5–6). Pp. 46–61 (in Russ.).
  24. Kun T., Ball O. A. Logic of discovery or psychology of research? // Philosophy of Science. 1997. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 20–48 (in Russ.).
  25. Kun T., Lakatos I., Popper K. R. The structure of scientific revolutions / compilation and preface to the book: V. Yu. Kuznetsov; transl. from English: I. Z. Naletov, V. N. Porus, A. L. Nikiforov, O. A. Ball. M., 2001 (in Russ.).
  26. Lazarev V. V. Doctrine of implementation of solutions judicial bodies in legislation // Journal of Russ. law. 2019. No. 7. P. 7 (in Russ.).
  27. Lazarev V. V. Functional characteristics of the principles of law // Yurid. technika. 2020. No. 14. Pp. 207–212 (in Russ.).
  28. Lazarev V. V., Fursov D. A. On the question of the role of justice in the life of the state // Legal science and practice. Herald of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018. No. 4 (44). Pp. 34–38 (in Russ.).
  29. Mal’ko A.V., Salomatin A. Yu. Conceptual proposals for deepening judicial reform in Russia // Legal policy and legal life. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 29–36 (in Russ.).
  30. Maltsev G. V. Social foundations of law. M., 2011 (in Russ.).
  31. Matskevich I. M., Vlasenko N. A. Formalization of specialties of scientific research in the field of law: content and prospects // Journal of Russ. law. 2013. No. 6 (198). Pp. 116–147 (in Russ.).
  32. Momotov V. V. Russian justice at the present stage: the main trends of development // Judge. 2018. No. 8 (92). Pp. 41–51 (in Russ.).
  33. Momotov V. V. Judicial reform of 2018 in the Russian Federation: concept, goals, content (part I) // Journal of Russ. law. 2018. No. 10 262). Pp. 134–146 (in Russ.).
  34. Savenkov A. N. Philosophy of Law and legal thinking: history and modernity // Questions of philosophy. 2019. No. 8. Pp. 38–48 (in Russ.).
  35. Stepin V. S. Scientific rationality in technogenic culture: types and historical evolution // Questions of philosophy. 2012. No. 5. P. 18 (in Russ.).
  36. Stepin V. S. Features of scientific cognition and criteria of types of scientific rationality // Epistemology and philosophy of science. 2013. Vol. 36. No. 2. Pp. 78–91 (in Russ.).
  37. Stepin V. S. Types of scientific rationality and synergetic paradigm // Complexity. The mind. Post-neoclassical. 2013. No. 4. Pp. 45–59 (in Russ.).
  38. Yarovaya M. V. Typology of judicial systems of modern European states // Herald of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Ser. “Legal Sciences”. 2008. No. 1 (21). Pp. 49–53 (in Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies