Comparative Constitutional Law: new approaches, concepts and categories (All-Russian the “Round Table”)
- Authors: Varlamova N.V.1, Vasilieva T.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 11 (2023)
- Pages: 207-215
- Section: Scientific life
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1026-9452/article/view/251274
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520028732-6
- ID: 251274
Abstract
About the authors
Natalia V. Varlamova
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation, Moscow
Tatiana A. Vasilieva
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7294-1649
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Боден Ж. О демономании колдунов / пер. с ср.-фр. и лат. И. Сахарчука. СПб., 2021.
- Arnull A. The Many Ages of the Court of Justice of the European Union // New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice: Revisiting Law in Context / ed. by C. Kilpatrick, J. Scott. Oxford, 2020. P. 12–44.
- Besselink L.F.M. The Parameters of Constitutional Conflict after Melloni // European Law Review. 2014. Vol. 39. No. 4. P. 531–552.
- Franklin J.H. Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth-Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History. New York, London, 1963.
- Hotman F. Antitribonian / ed., transl. by H.A. Lloyd. Leiden, Boston, 2021.
- Kelley D.R. Civil Science in the Renaissance: Jurisprudence in the French Manner // History of European Ideas. 1981. Vol. 2. Iss. 4. P. 261–276.
- Rasmussen M. Agents of Constitutionalism: The Quest for a Constitutional Breakthrough in European Law, 1945–1964 // Crafting the International Order. Practitioners and Practices of International Law since c. 1800 / ed. by M.M. Payk, K.C. Priemel. Oxford, 2021. P. 249–276.
- Rasmussen M. Establishing a Constitutional Practice of European Law: The History of the Legal Service of the European Executive, 1952–65 // Contemporary European History. 2012. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 375–397.
- Siegel N.S., Siegel R.B. Equality Arguments for Abortion Rights // UCLA Law Review Discourse. 2013. Vol. 60. P. 160–170.
