Civil society, “civil theology” and Augustine’s political morality: a comparative analysis with ancient teachings

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The study is devoted to a comparative analysis of the concepts of “civil society”, “civil theology” in relation to the political morality of Blessed Augustine Aurelius with ancient teachings. The article attempts a hermeneutic analysis of the concept of civil society often used in the theory of state-legal doctrines. The differences are established between the pagan Roman understanding of justice and the proposed by Blessed Augustine, based on Holy Scripture as the basis of state-legal relations in ancient society: according to Augustine, the real reason why classical philosophy makes it impossible to raise virtuous people and leads to self-destruction is not because it is irreligious, but because it expresses itself in a wrong and wrong conception of a deity. And this is most evident in pagan polytheism. It is therefore clear that Augustine, in his attempt to define civil society, follows the classical tradition, emphasizing its essential agreement with Scripture. His main opposition to the ancient pagan philosophers concerns not so much their teaching about the natural ideals of civil society and the need for the existence of justice within it, but their inability to achieve a single just society.

About the authors

Sergey Nikolaevich Khrameshin

Slavic Greek Latin Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: gospravo@igpran.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Аврелий Августин. Письма // Letters of St. Augustine of Hippo [Electronic resource] // New Advent. 2020. URL: https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1102.htm (дата обращения: 03.02.2020)).
  2. Белов В.Н., Сеземан В.Э. Этика Платона и проблема зла // Кантовский сборник. 2010. № 1 (31). С. 75–89.
  3. Блаженный Августин. Творения: в 4 т. / cост. и подгот. текста к печати С.И. Еремеева. Т. 3. О граде Божием. Кн. I–ХIII; т. 4. О граде Божием. Кн. ХIV–ХХII. СПб.; Киев, 1998.
  4. Цицерон. О государстве // Цицерон Марк Туллий. Диалоги: О государстве. О законах / пер. с лат. В.О. Горенштейн; изд. подгот. И.Н. Веселовский и др. М., 1994. С. 7–88.
  5. Чистякова О.В. Философские смыслы человека в греко-византийской патристике // Вопросы философии. 2021. № 8. С. 142–152.
  6. Arquillière Η.-X. L'augustinisme politique: Essai sur la formation des theories politiques du Moyen Âge. Paris, 1972. P. 102.
  7. Funkenstein Α. Théologie et imagination scientifique du Moyen Age au XVII siècle. Paris, 1995. P. 291, 292.
  8. Glotz G. Η ελληνική “πόλις” / μτφρ. Α. Σακελλαρίου. Αθήνα, 1989.
  9. History of political philosophy / L. Strauss, J. Cropsey (eds.). Chicago, 1987. P. 183, 184.
  10. Khrameshin S. Theological foundations of treatise “The city of God” by Aurelius Augustine // Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 2020. Vol. 17. No. 7. P. 8029–8042.
  11. Lenox-Conyngham Α. Ambrose and philosophy // Christian faith and Greek philosophy in late antiquity. Leiden, 1993. P. 112–128.
  12. MacMullen R. Corruption and the decline of Rome. New Haven, 1988. XII.
  13. Νίσμπετ Ρ. Κοινωνική αλλαγή και ιστορία. Αθήνα, 1995. Σ. 97–105.
  14. Peterson Ε. Der Monotheismus als politisches Problem: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der politischen Theologie im lmperium Romanum // Peterson Ε. Theologische Traktate. München, 1951. S. 45–147.
  15. Straub J. Regeneratio imperii. Aufsätze über Roms Kaisertum und Reich im Spiegel der hiednischen und christlichen Publizistik. Darmstadt, 1972. S. 271–295.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies