Comparison of 12 Quadrature Birdcage Coils with Different Leg Shapes at 9.4 T


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The purpose of this study was to analyse the relationship between the radio frequency (RF) coil performance and conductor surface shape for ultra-high field (UHF) magnetic resonance imaging. Twelve different leg-shaped quadrature birdcage coils were modeled and built, e.g., 4 mm-width-leg conventional birdcage coil, 7 mm-width-leg conventional birdcage, 10 mm-width-leg conventional birdcage coil, 13 mm-width-leg conventional birdcage coil, inside arc-shape-leg birdcage coil, outward arc-shape-leg birdcage coil, inside right angle-shape-leg birdcage coil, outward right angle-shape-leg birdcage coil, vertical 4 mm-width-leg vertical birdcage, 6 mm-width-leg vertical birdcage, 8 mm-width-leg vertical birdcage and 10 mm-width-leg vertical birdcage. Studies were carried out in both electromagnetic simulations with finite element method as well as in vitro saline phantom experiments at 9.4 T. Both the results of simulation and experiment showed that conventional birdcage coil produces the highest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) while the vertical birdcage coil produces the most homogeneous RF magnetic (B1) field at UHF. For conventional birdcage coils, as well as the vertical birdcage coils, only the proper width of legs results in the best performance (e.g., B1 homogeneous and SNR). For vertical birdcage coils, the wider the leg size, the higher RF magnetic (B1) field intensity distribution.

作者简介

Yongfeng Xu

High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Science and Technology of China

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: xu_yongfeng@163.com
中国, Hefei, 230031; Hefei, 230026

Qingqing Wen

High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Email: xu_yongfeng@163.com
中国, Hefei, 230031; Beijing, 10010


版权所有 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, 2017
##common.cookie##