Cu(II) EPR Reveals Two Distinct Binding Sites and Oligomerization of Innate Immune Protein Calgranulin C
- Authors: Ghosh S.1, Garcia V.2,3, Singewald K.1, Damo S.M.2,3, Saxena S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh
- Department of Chemistry, Fisk University
- Department of Biochemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University
- Issue: Vol 49, No 11 (2018)
- Pages: 1299-1311
- Section: Original Paper
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0937-9347/article/view/248202
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-018-1053-7
- ID: 248202
Cite item
Abstract
S100A12 or Calgranulin C is a homodimeric antimicrobial protein of the S100 family of EF-hand calcium-modulated proteins. S100A12 is involved in many diseases such as inflammation, tumor invasion, cancer and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease. The binding of transition metal ions to the protein is important as the sequestering of the metal ion induces conformational changes in the protein, inhibiting the growth of various pathogenic microorganisms. In this work, we probe the Cu2+ binding properties of Calgranulin C. We demonstrate that the two Cu2+ binding sites in Calgranulin C show different coordination environments in solution. Continuous wave-electron spin resonance (CW-ESR) spectra of Cu2+-bound protein clearly show two distinct components at higher Cu2+:protein ratios, which is indicative of the two different binding environments for the Cu2+ ions. The g|| and A|| values are also different for the two components, indicating that the number of directly coordinated nitrogen in each site differs. Furthermore, we perform CW-ESR titrations to obtain the binding affinity of the Ca2+-loaded protein to Cu2+ ions. We observe a positive cooperativity in binding of the two Cu2+ ions. To further probe the Cu2+ coordination, we also perform electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) experiment. We perform ESEEM at two different fields where one Cu2+ binding site dominates the other. At both sites we see distinct signatures of Cu2+–histidine coordination. However, we clearly see that the ESEEM spectra corresponding to the two Cu2+ binding sites are significantly different. There is clear change in the intensity of the double quantum peak with respect to the nuclear quadrupole interaction peak at the two different fields. Furthermore, ESEEM along with hyperfine sublevel correlation show that only one of the two Cu2+ binding sites has backbone coordination, confirming our previous observation. Finally, we perform double electron–electron resonance spectroscopy to probe if the difference in binding environment is due to the Cu2+ binding to different sites in the protein. We obtain a distance distribution with a sharp peak at ~ 3 nm and a broad peak at ~ 4 nm. The shorter distance agrees with the Cu2+–Cu2+ distance expected for a dimer from the crystal structure. The longer distance is consistent with the Cu2+–Cu2+ distance when oligomerization occurs.
About the authors
Shreya Ghosh
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh
Email: sksaxena@pitt.edu
United States, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260
Velia Garcia
Department of Chemistry, Fisk University; Department of Biochemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University
Email: sksaxena@pitt.edu
United States, Nashville, TN, 32708; Nashville, TN, 37232
Kevin Singewald
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh
Email: sksaxena@pitt.edu
United States, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260
Steven M. Damo
Department of Chemistry, Fisk University; Department of Biochemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University
Author for correspondence.
Email: sdamo@fisk.edu
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1483-7712
United States, Nashville, TN, 32708; Nashville, TN, 37232
Sunil Saxena
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh
Author for correspondence.
Email: sksaxena@pitt.edu
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9098-6114
United States, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260