Lengthening of Femur by Bliskunov Device Using Application of Different Types of Osteotomies
- Authors: Bliskunov A.I.1,2, Le’kin M.G.1,2, Jumabekov S.A.1,2, Shuvaev V.G.1,2, Kokurnikov V.N.1,2, Kuzenko S.N.1,2, Dragan V.V.1,2, Plotkin A.V.1,2, Andrianov M.V.1,2, Zarichniy A.V.1,2, Tkach A.V.1,2, Shpuntov A.E.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Crimean Medical Institute
- Simferopol State University
- Issue: Vol 3, No 3 (1996)
- Pages: 22-30
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0869-8678/article/view/101786
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto101786
- ID: 101786
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
One hundred fifty two patients underwent lengthening of 174 femurs with fully implanted guided device inwhich patient’s muscular energy was used as a source of energy. Dissection of bone from the side of bone marrow canal was carried out by specially eleborated osteotome which provided transverse oblique, oblique transverse, Z-shape strraight and Z-shape oblique osteotomy. Transverse osteotomy was applied in 59 patients (33.9%), oblique - in 70 (40,6%), oblique transverse - in 26 (14.9%) patients. Distraction stage was completed in all patients. In 165 (94.8%) out of 174 cases planned volume lehgethening was achieved. In 150 patients devices were removed. Average rate of distraction was 1.4 ± 0,3 mm/ daily, average duration of distraction was 87 ± 13 days. Good results were achieved in 141 cases (94%), satisfactory - in 7 cases (4.6%), unsatisfactory - in 2 cases (1.4%) out of 150. Complications were observed in 30 (17.2%) out of 174 cases. In 9 cases (5.2%) complications influenced the treatment outcome. Analysis of complications showed that they might be to great extent prevented by accurate observance of the technique of distractor implantation, performance of osteotomy, rate of distraction and rational postoperative management of patient.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A. I. Bliskunov
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
M. G. Le’kin
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
S. A. Jumabekov
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
V. G. Shuvaev
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
V. N. Kokurnikov
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
S. N. Kuzenko
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
V. V. Dragan
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
A. V. Plotkin
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
M. V. Andrianov
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
A. V. Zarichniy
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
A. V. Tkach
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
A. E. Shpuntov
Crimean Medical Institute; Simferopol State University
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Simferopol; Simferopol
References
Supplementary files
