Dynamic ultrasonic research mediopatellary synovial folding knee joint

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the reasons for the formation of pain syndrome in the anterior part of the knee joint is a pathologically thickened mediopatellar synovial plica (MP). MP most often pathologically changes and as a result leads to changes in the nearby structures of the knee joint. However, there are difficulties in assessing the direct impact of MPSS on the articular cartilage of the patella and medial condyle of the femur, for this it is advisable to perform ultrasound examination using functional tests.

AIM: To study the effectiveness of ultrasound examination with the use of functional tests in the diagnosis of MP pathology, which are important in determining tactics and evaluating treatment results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of a comparative survey of 80 patients are presented. The first stage of the MRI was performed on patients, according to which the type of change in MP was evaluated. The second stage was ultrasound with the use of functional tests.

RESULTS: According to MRI data, type A was detected in 11, type B in 17, type C in 38 and type D in 14 patients. Ultrasound results showed that type A and B MP were not infringed in any case, and type C and D MP were infringed in 24 (63.2%) and 12 (85.7%) cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The study made it possible to determine not only the presence or absence of pathologically thickened MP, but also to assess the degree of its influence on nearby joint structures, such as thickness, the degree of vascularization of both the fold itself and the synovial membrane around it, the presence or absence of infringement during flexion and extension of the knee joint and SHELF syndrome, and therefore, the degree of its participation in the formation of pain syndrome.

About the authors

Nikolay A. Eskin

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: cito-uchsovet@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4738-7348
SPIN-code: 1215-9279

MD, PhD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, head of the department of ultrasound diagnostics

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexander A. Ochkurenko

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: cito-omo@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1078-9725
SPIN-code: 8324-2383

MD, PhD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, traumatologist-orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Fatima U. Kusova

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: kusova_cito@mail.ru

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), ultrasound diagnostics doctor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anton P. Kurpyakov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: Avodatskiy@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 3398-7972

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), traumatologist-orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexandr Gorokhvodatsky

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Author for correspondence.
Email: Avodatskiy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5855-1214
SPIN-code: 8033-8688

MD, traumatologist-orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Natalya Yu. Matveeva

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: nymatveeva@gmail.com

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), ultrasound diagnostics doctor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Ogata S, Uhthoff HK. The development of synovial plicae in human knee joints: an embryologic study. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(4):315–321. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(90)90063-j
  2. Pipkin G. Knee injuries: the role of the suprapatellar plica and suprapatellar bursa in simulating internal derangements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971;74:161–176.
  3. Anderson H. Histochemical studies on the histogenesis of the knee and superior tibio fibular joints. Acta Anat (Basel). 1961;46:279–303. doi: 10.1159/000141791
  4. Calpur OU, Copuroglu C, Ozcan M. United unresorbed medial and lateral plicae as anterior mesenchymal synovial septal remnant. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002;10(6):378–380. doi: 10.1007/s00167-002-0297-8
  5. Broukhim B, Fox JM, Blazina ME, et al. The synovial shelf syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(142):135–138.
  6. Jackson RW, Marshall DJ, Fujisawa Y. The pathological medial shelf. Orthop Clin North Am. 1982;13(2):307–312.
  7. Mital MA, Hayden J. Pain in the knee in children: the medial plica shelf syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am. 1979;10(3):713–722.
  8. Moller H. Incarcerating mediopatellar synovial plica syndrome. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(3):357–361. doi: 10.3109/17453678109050115
  9. Schindler OS. ‘The Sneaky Plica’ revisited: morphology, pathophysiology and treatment of synovial plicae of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(2):247–262. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2368-4
  10. Yuan HF, Guo CA, Yan ZQ. Mediopatellar plica as a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(2):277–278. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.149237
  11. Wang HS, Kuo PY, Yang CC, Lyu SR. Matrix metalloprotease-3 expression in the medial plica and pannus-like tissue in knees from patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. Histopathology. 2011;58(4):593–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03783.x
  12. Dupont JY. Synovial plicae of the knee. Controversies and review. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16(1):87–122. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5919(05)70009-0
  13. ultrasound.net.ua [Internet]. Abstracts of the V Congress of UAFUD 2016 [cited 2021 Sep 30]. Ponomarenko SA, Abdullaev RYa, Sysun LA, Kalashnikov VI. Ul’trazvukovaya diagnostika patologii sinovial’nykh skladok kolennykh sustavov; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://ultrasound.net.ua/materiali/materialii-konferencii-ta-zjizdiv/v-kongres-uafud-2016/tezi-v-kongresu-uafud/ultrazvukovaja-diagnostika-patologii-sinovialnykh-skladok-kolennykh-sustavov/
  14. Lee YH, Song HT, Kim S, et al. Infrapatellar plica of the knee: revisited with MR arthrographies undertaken in the knee flexion position mimicking operative arthroscopic posture. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(10):2783–2787. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.028
  15. Weckstrom M, Niva MH, Lamminen A, et al. Arthroscopic resection of medial plica of the knee in young adults. Knee. 2010;17(2):103–107. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.07.010
  16. Sakakibara J. Arthroscopic study on lino’s band (plica synovialis mediopatellaris). J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1976;50:513–522.
  17. Paczesny L, Kruczynski J. Medial plica syndrome of the knee: diagnosis with dynamic sonograph radiology. Radiology. 2009;251(2):439–446. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2512081652
  18. Grobbelaar N, Bouffard JA. Sonography of the knee, a pictorial review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21(3):231–274. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2171(00)90045-3
  19. Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Quinn M, et al. Validation and reproducibility of ultrasonography in the detection of synovitis in the knee: a comparison with arthroscopy and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(2):387–394. doi: 10.1002/art.20054
  20. Munzinger U, Ruckstuhl J, Scherrer H, Gschwend N. Internal derangement of the knee joint due to pathologic synovial folds: the mediopatellar plica syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;(155):59–64.
  21. Guney A, Bilal O, Oner M, et al. Short- and mid-term results of plica excision in patients with mediopatellar plica and associated cartilage degeneration. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(11):1526–1531. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1125-1

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. A picture of the mediopatellar synovial fold obtained using magnetic resonance imaging

Download (69KB)
3. Fig. 2. Location of the limb and transducer during sonography of the mediopatellar synovial fold, as well as the dynamic test

Download (120KB)
4. Fig. 3. Illustration and layout of the mediopatellar synovial fold of the knee joint

Download (131KB)
5. Fig. 4. X-ray of the knee joint. Positions of the ultrasonic transducer during the study: 1 — the transducer is located incorrectly, more proximally; 2 — the sensor is in the correct position; 3 — the sensor is located incorrectly, more distally

Download (94KB)
6. Fig. 5. Knee joint sonograms: a — sonogram when the sensor is located in the X-ray position 1, more proximally; b — sonogram when the sensor is located in the X-ray position 2, correct; c — sonogram when the sensor is located in X-ray position 3, more distally. Arrows indicate the mediopatellar synovial fold

Download (118KB)
7. Fig. 6. Sonograms before (a) and after (b) the dynamic test. Arrows indicate the mediopatellar synovial fold

Download (129KB)
8. Fig. 7. Position of the transducer and limb in the study of the mediopatellar synovial fold (a) and the dynamic test (b)

Download (192KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies