Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Epidemiology, Causes, Risk Factors (foreign literature review)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Publications related to revision hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Data of National Registers from different countries were presented, problems of epidemiology and prognostication of need in revision arthroplasty were highlighted, the causes (demographic, clinical, surgical, rehabilitation) and the most significant risk factors that conditioned the failure of primary hip arthroplasty were described.

About the authors

A. V Kaminskiy

Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, Russia

канд. мед. наук, старший науч. сотр. лаборатории реконструктивного эндопротезирования и артроскопии, зав. травматолого-ортопедическим отделением № 8

L. O Marchenkova

Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, Russia

Email: mlo59@mail.ru
канд. мед. наук, вед. специалист организационно-методического отдела; Тел.: (3522) 45-45-70 640014, Курган, ул. Марии Ульяновой, д. 6, РНЦ «ВТО» им. акад. Г.А. Илизарова

A. V Pozdnyakov

Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, Russia

канд. мед. наук, лаборант-исследователь лаборатории реконструктивного эндопротезирования и артроскопии.

References

  1. Prokopetz J.JZ., Losina E., Bliss R.L., Wright J., Baron J.F., Katz J.N. Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMS Musculoskelet. Disord. 2012; 13: 251-63.
  2. Sagalovsky S., Schonert M. Cellular and molecular mechanisms og development of aceptic instability of hip implant. Trauma. 2012; 1 (13): 153-60.
  3. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007; 89 (4): 780-5.
  4. Kurtz S., Mowat F., Ong K., Chan N., Lau E., Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005; 87 (7): 1487-97.
  5. Lazarinis S., Karrholm J., Hailer N.P. Increased risk of revision of acetabular cups coated with hydroxyapatite. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010; 81 (1): 53-9.
  6. Barrack R.L., Hoffman G.J., Tejeiro W.V., Carpenter L.J., Jr. Surgeon work input and risk in primary versus revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010; 468: 2046-51.
  7. Crowe J.F., Sculco T.P., Kahn B. Revision total hip arthroplasty: hospital cost and reimbursement analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003; 413: 175-82.
  8. Ritter M.A., Carr K.D., Keating E.M., Faris P.N., Bankoff D.L., Ireland P.M. Revision total joint arthroplasty: does medicare reimbursement justify time spent? Orthopedics. 1996; 19: 137-9.
  9. Arthursson A.J., Fumes O., Espehaug B., Havelin L.I., Soreide J.A. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty - does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19304 Charnley and 6002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2007; 78 (6): 719-729.
  10. Bozic K.J., Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Ong K., Vail T.P., Berry D.J. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009; 91 (1): 128-33.
  11. Hailer N.P., Garellick G., Karrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Regester. Acta Ortop. 2010; 81 (1): 34-41.
  12. Villanueva-Martınez M., Hernandez-Barrera V., Chana-Rodríguez F., Rojo-Manaute J., Rıos-Luna A., San Roman Montero J., Gil-de-Miguel A., Jimenez-Garcia R. Trends in incidence and outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty in Spain: a population based study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2012; 13: 37-46.
  13. Tian W., DeJoing G., Brown M., Hsieh C., Zamfirov Z.P., Horn S.D. Looking upsteam: Factors shaping the demand for postacute joint replacement rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1260-8.
  14. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register., Available at: [http//nriweb.ihelse.net/eng/Annual_Report_2009.pdf] Accessed 10 January 2012.
  15. Australian National Joint Register.Available at [http//earisview.com/2011/08/07/australian-national-joint-registry-2010-summary-on-hip-replacements/] Accessed 10 January 2012.
  16. Sibanda N., Copley L.P., Lewsey J.D., Borroff M., Gregg P., MacGregor A.J., Pickford M., Porter M., Tucker K., van der Meulen J.H. On behalf of the Steering Committee of the National Joint Registry (NJR) for England and Wales. Revision rates after primary hip and knee replacement in England between 2003 and 2006. PLoS Med. 2008; 5 (9): e 179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050179.
  17. Peltola M., Malmivaara A., Paavola M. Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk. A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations. Acta Orthop. 2013; 84 (1): 25-31.
  18. Ong K.L., Lau E., Suggs J., Kurtz S.M., Manley M.T. Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010; 468: 3070-6.
  19. Ulrich S.D., Seyler T.M., Bennett D., Delanois R.E., Saleh K.J., Thongtrangan I., Kuskowski M., Cheng E.Y., Sharkey P.F., Parvizi J., Stiehl J.B., Mont M.A. Total hip arthroplasties: what are reasons for revision? Int. Ortop. (SICOT). 2008; 32: 597-604.
  20. Lindgren V., Garellick G., Karrholm J., Wretenberg P. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty. A study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hip replacements with 3 different cemented prostheses. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83 (6): 559-65.
  21. Drees P., Huber L.C. Molekulare und zellulare Mechanismen der aseptischen Prothesenlockerung. Rheuma Nachrichten. 2005; 37: 12-7.
  22. Dohmae Y., Bechtold J.E., Sherman R.E., Puno R.M., Gustilo R.B. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988; 236: 214-20.
  23. Paulsen A., Pedersen A.B., Johnsen S.P. Riis A., Lucht U., Overgaad S. Effect of hydroxyapatite coating on risk of revision after ptimary total hip arthroplasry in younger patients: findings from the Danish Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop. 2007; 78: 622-8.
  24. Ali M.S., Kumar A. Hydroxyapatite-coated RM cup in primary hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2003; 27: 90-3.
  25. Cheung K.W., Yung S.H., Wong K.C. Chiu K.H. Early failure of smooth hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit acetabular cup -7 years of follow-up. J. Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 627-31.
  26. Hailer N.P., Weiss R.J., Stark A., Rarrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83 (5): 442-8.
  27. Thillemann T.M., Pedersen A.B., Johnsen S.P., Soballe K. Implant survival after primary total hip arthroplasty due to childhood hip disorders: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop. 2008; 79 (6): 769-76.
  28. Sarvilinna R., Huhtala H.S.A., Puolakka T.J.S., Nevalainen J.K., Pajamaki K.J.J. Periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty: an epidemiologic study. Int. Orthop. (SICOT). 2003; 27: 359-61.
  29. Lachiewicz P.F., Soileau E.S. Changing indications for revision total hip arthroplasty. J. Surg. Orthop. Adv. 2005; 14 (2): 82-4.
  30. Hassan T., Birtwistle S., Power R.A., Harper W.M. Revision hip arthroplasty activity in a single UK health region: an audit of 1265 cases. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2000; 82: 283-6.
  31. Dale H., Fenstad A.M., Hallan G., Havelin L.I., Furnes O., Overgaard S., Pedersen A.B. et al. Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. 2,778 revisions due to infection after 432,168 primary THAs in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA). Acta Orthоp. 2012; 83 (5): 449-58.
  32. Lakemeier S., Peterlien C.D., Belz A., Timmesfeld N., Fuchs-Winkelmann S., Schofer M.D. Current status of revision total hip arthroplasty in Germany. Biomed. Tech. 2010; 55 (4): 219-27.
  33. Dale H., Hallan G., Espehaug B., Havelin L.I., Engesater L.B. Increasing risk of revision due to deep infection after hip arthroplasty. A study on 97,344 primary total hip replacements in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1987 to 2007. Acta Orthop. 2009; 80 (6): 639-45.
  34. Weeden S.H., Paprosky W.G. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2002; 17 [4 Suppl. 1]: 134-7.
  35. Springer B.D., Fehring T.K., Griffin W.L., Odum S.M., Masonis J.L. Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 467: 166-73.
  36. Jafari S.M., Coyle C., Mortazavi S.M.J., Sharkey P.F., Parvizi J. Revision hip arthroplasty. Infection in the most common cause of failure. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010; 468: 2046-51.
  37. Engesater L.B., Engesater I., Fenstad A.M., Havelin L.I., Karrholm J., Garellick G. et al. Low revision rate after total hip arthroplasty in patients with pediatric hip diseases. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83 (5): 436-41.
  38. Schrama J.C., Espehaug B., Hallan G., Engesaeter L.B., Furnes O., Havelin L.I., Fevang B-T.S. Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: a prospective, population-based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Arthritis Care Res. 2010; 62 (4): 473-9.
  39. Franklin J., Robertsson O., Gestsson J., Lohmander L.S., Ingvarsson T. Revision and complication rates in 654 Exeter total hip replacements, with a maximum follow-up of 20 years. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2003; 4: 6-10.
  40. Girard J., Glorion C., Bonnomet F., Frjn D., Migaud H. Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011; 469: 1141-7.
  41. Cram P., Ibrahim S.A., Lu X., Wolf B.R. Impact of alternative coding schemes on incidence rates of key complications after total hip arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a national data set. Geriatric Orthop. Surg. Rehab. 2012; 3 (1): 17-26.
  42. Thien T.M., Karrholm J. Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81 (4): 407-12.
  43. Corbett K.L., Losina E., Nti A.A., Prokopetz J.J.Z., Katz J.N. Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2010; 5 (10): e 13520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.00113520.

Copyright (c) 2015 Eco-Vector



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies