Risk Factors and Potentialities of Dislocation Prevention after Total Hip Arthroplasty


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The literature review is dedicated to the problem of femoral component dislocation after primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Modern data on surgeon-dependent and -independent risk factors for this complication development are analyzed. Potentialities for dislocation prevention using constrained liners and dual mobility system are considered

About the authors

Dmitriy V. Stafeev

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R. R. Vreden

Email: dvstafeev@rniito.ru; stafeevd@gmail.com
Сand. med. sci., trauma and orthopaedic surgeon, department №7, chair of traumatology and orthopaedics of the RSRI of TO n.a. R.R. Vreden St. Petersburg, Russia

N. N Efimov

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R. R. Vreden

аспирант РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена St. Petersburg, Russia

E. P Sorokin

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R. R. Vreden

канд. мед. наук, врач травматолог-ортопед отделения №7, науч. сотр. отделения диагностики заболеваний и повреждений ОДС St. Petersburg, Russia

D. V Chugaev

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R. R. Vreden

врач травматолог-ортопед отделения №7, лаборант-исследователь отделения диагностики заболеваний и повреждений ОДС St. Petersburg, Russia

A. I Gudz

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R. R. Vreden

врач травматолог-ортопед отделения №7, лаборант-исследователь отделения диагностики заболеваний и повреждений ОДС St. Petersburg, Russia

A. A Boyarov

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R. R. Vreden

врач травматолог-ортопед отделения №9, младший науч. сотр. отделения патологии тазобедренного сустава. St. Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Kurtz S.M., Ong K.L., Lau E., Bozic K.J. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014; 96 (8): 624-30. doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.M.00285.
  2. Коваленко А.Н., Шубняков И.И., Тихилов Р.М., Черный А.Ж. Обеспечивают ли новые и более дорогие имплантаты лучший результат эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава? Травматология и ортопедия России. 2015; 1: 5-20. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2015-0-1-5-20.
  3. Миронов С.П., ред. Травматизм, ортопедическая заболеваемость, состояние травматолого-ортопедической помощи населению России в 2014 году. М.; 2015.
  4. Миронов С.П., ред. Травматизм, ортопедическая заболеваемость, состояние травматологоортопедической помощи населению России в 2015 году. М.; 2016.
  5. Абдулнасыров Р.К., Киреев С.И., Марков Д.А. и др. Зависимость риска вывихов головки эндопротеза тазобедренного сустава от вида примененного доступа (обзор). Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2016; 12 (2): 175-81.
  6. Тихилов Р.М., Шубняков И.И., ред. Руководство по хирургии тазобедренного сустава. т. 2. СПб.: РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена; 2015.
  7. Шильников В.А., Байбородов А.Б., Денисов А.О., Ефимов Н.Н. Двойная мобильность ацетабулярного компонента как способ профилактики вывиха головки эндопротеза тазобедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2016; 22 (4): 107-13. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2016-22-4-107-113.
  8. D’Angelo F., Murena L., Zatti G., Cherubino P. The unstable total hip replacement. Indian J. Orthop. 2008: 42 (3): 252-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.39667.
  9. Danoff J.R., Bobman J.T., Cunn G. et al. Redefining the acetabular component safe zone for posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthropasty. 2016; 31 (2): 506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.010.
  10. Sanchez-Sotelo J., Berry D.J. Epidemiology of instability after total hip replacement. Orthop. Clin. North. Am. 2001; 32 (4): 543-52.
  11. Yoshimoto K., Nakashima Y., Yamamoto T. et al. Dislocation and its recurrence after revision total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2016; 40 (8): 1625-30. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3020-3.
  12. Berry D.J., von Knoch M., Schleck C.D., Harmsen W.S. The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2004; 86 (1): 9-14.
  13. Capón-García D., López-Pardo A., Alves-Pérez M.T. Causes for revision surgery in total hip replacement. A retrospective epidemiological analysis. Rev. Esp. Cir. Ortop. Traumatol. 2016; 60 (3): 160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2016.01.002.
  14. Тихилов Р.М., Шубняков И.И., Коваленко А.Н. и др. Структура ранних ревизий эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2014; (2): 5-13. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2014-0-2-5-13.
  15. Garbuz D.S., Marsi B.A., Duncan C.P. et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012; 470 (2): 351-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2146-x.
  16. Jo S., Jimenez Almonte J.H., Sierra R.J. The cumulative risk of re-dislocation after revision THA performed for instability increases close to 35% at 15 years. J. Arthropasty. 2015; 30 (7): 1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.001.
  17. Захарян Н.Г. Вывихи после тотального эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 2008.
  18. Berry D.J., von Knoch M., Schleck C.D., Harmsen W.S. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005; 87 (11): 2456-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02860.
  19. Загородний Н.В., Захарян Н.Г., Карданов А.А. и др. Факторы риска возникновения вывиха после тотального эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава (обзор литературы). Травматология и ортопедия России. 2008; 4: 111-6.
  20. Esposito C.I., Gladnick B.P., Lee Y.Y. et al. Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2015; 30 (1): 109-13. doi: 10.1016/j. arth.2014.07.009.
  21. Молодов М.А., Даниляк В.В., Ключевский В.В. и др. Факторы риска вывихов тотальных эндопротезов тазобедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2013; 2: 23-30. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2013--2-23-30.
  22. Fujishiro T., Hiranaka T., Hashimoto S. et al. The effect of acetabular and femoral component version on dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2016; 40 (4): 697-702. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2924-2.
  23. Nakashima Y., Hirata M., Akiyama M. et al. Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2014; 38 (1): 27-32. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2091-2.
  24. Ключевский В.В., Даниляк В.В., Белов М.В. и др. Вывихи после тотального замещения тазобедренного сустава: факторы риска, способы лечения. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2009; 3: 136-7.
  25. Iorio R., Healy W.L., Lemos D.W. et al. Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001; 383: 229-42.
  26. Khatod M., Barber T., Paxton E. et al. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006; 447: 19-23. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78.
  27. Hailer N.P., Weiss R.J., Stark A., Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83 (5): 442-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919.
  28. Jolles B.M., Zangger P., Leyvraz P.F. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J. Arthroplasty. 2002; 17 (3): 282-8.
  29. Каграманов С.В., Загородний Н.В., Нуждин В.И., Буравцова М.Е. Лечение пациентов с вывихами головки эндопротеза тазобедренного сустава. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2012; 1: 30-4.
  30. Hernigou P., Trousselier M., Roubineau F. et al. Dualmobility or constrained liners are more effective than preoperative bariatric surgery in prevention of THA dislocation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016; 474 (10): 2202-10. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4859-3.
  31. Sadr Azodi O., Adami J., Lindström D. et al. High body mass index is associated with increased risk of implant dislocation following primary total hip replacement: 2,106 patients followed for up to 8 years. Acta Orthop. 2008; 79 (1): 141-7. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014897.
  32. Wagner E.R., Kamath A.F., Fruth K.M. et al. Effect of body mass index on complications and reoperations after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2016; 98 (3): 169-79. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00430.
  33. Hayashi S., Nishiyama T., Fujishiro T. et al. Obese patients may have more soft tissue impingement following primary total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2012; 36 (12): 2419-23. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1701-8.
  34. Kim Y., Morshed S., Joseph T. et al. Clinical impact of obesity on stability following revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006; 453: 142-6. doi: 10.1097/01. blo.0000246529.14135.2b.
  35. Elkins J.M., Daniel M., Pedersen D.R. et al. Morbid obesity may increase dislocation in total hip patients: a biomechanical analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013; 471 (3): 971-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2512-3.
  36. Bergman R.N., Stefanovski D., Buchanan T.A. et al. A better index of body adiposity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011; 19 (5): 1083-9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.38.
  37. Saleh K.J., Mulhall K.J., Bershadsky B. et al. Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005; 87 (9): 1985-94. doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.D.02564.
  38. García-Rey E., García-Cimbrelo E. Abductor biomechanics clinically impact the total hip arthroplasty dislocation rate: a prospective long-term study. J. Arthroplasty. 2016; 31 (2); 484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.039.
  39. Wetters N.G., Murray T.G., Moric M. et al. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013; 471 (2): 410-6. doi: 10.1007/ s11999-012-2561-7.
  40. Carter A.H., Sheehan E.C., Mortazavi S.M. et al. Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure? J. Arthroplasty. 2011; 26 (6 Suppl): 46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.021.
  41. Турков П.С., Прохоренко В.М., Павлов В.В. Компьютерная навигация при первичном и ревизионном эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава. Современное искусство медицины. 2013; 2-3 (10-11): 40-3.
  42. Alberton G.M., High W.A., Morrey B.F. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2002; 84 (10): 1788-92.
  43. Kwon M.S., Kuskowski M., Mulhall K.J. et al. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006; 447: 34-8. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218746.84494.df.
  44. Malek I.A., Royce G., Bhatti S.U. et al. A comparison between the direct anterior and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty: the role of an ‘Enhanced Recovery’ pathway. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B (6): 754-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36608.
  45. Maratt J.D., Gagnier J.J., Butler P.D. et al. No difference in dislocation seen in anterior vs posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2016; 31 (9 Suppl): 127-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.071.
  46. Enocson A., Hedbeck C.J., Tidermark J. et al. Dislocation of total hip replacement in patients with fractures of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop. 2009; 80 (2): 184-9. doi: 10.3109/17453670902930024.
  47. Xu C.P., Li X., Song J.Q. et al. Mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS One. 2013; 8 (11): e80021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080021.
  48. Howie D.W., Holubowycz O.T., Middleton R., Large Articulation Study Group. Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2012; 94 (12): 1095-102. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00570.
  49. Nevelos J., Johnson A., Heffernan C. et al. What factors affect posterior dislocation distance in THA? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013; 471 (2): 519-26. doi: 10.1007/ s11999-012-2559-1.
  50. Турков П.С., Прохоренко В.М., Павлов В.В. Способ оценки положения компонентов эндопротеза тазобедренного сустава. Патент РФ № 2525206; 2014.
  51. Elkins J.M., Callaghan J.J., Brown T.D. The 2014 Frank Stinchfield award: the “landing zone” for wear and stability in total hip arthroplasty is smaller than we thought: a computational analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2015; 473 (2): 441-52. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3818-0.
  52. Pierchon F., Pasquier G., Cotten A. et al. Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1994; 76 (1): 45-8.
  53. Dorr L.D., Malik A., Dastane M., Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 467 (1): 119-27. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0598-4.
  54. Ranawat C., Maynard M. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech. Orthop. 1991; 6: 17-25. doi: 10.1097/00013611-199109000-00004.
  55. Weber M., Woerner M., Craiovan B. et al. Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2016; 40 (12): 2495-504. doi:10.1007/ s00264-016-3171-x.
  56. Rodriguez-Elizalde S., Yeager A.M., Ravi B. et al. Computerized virtual surgery demonstrates where acetabular rim osteophytes most reduce range of motion following total hip arthroplasty. HSS J. 2013; 9 (3): 223-8. doi: 10.1007/s11420-013-9337-9.
  57. Civinini R., Carulli C., Matassi F. et al. A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012; 470 (12): 3542-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2428-y.
  58. Noble P.C., Durrani S.K., Usrey M.M. et al. Constrained cups appear incapable of Meeting the Demands of Revision THA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012; 470 (7): 1907-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2212-4.
  59. Guyen O., Lewallen D.G., Cabanela M.E. Modes of failure of Osteonics constrained tripolar implants: a retrospective analysis of forty-three failed implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2008; 90 (7): 1553-60. doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.G.00317.
  60. Chalmers B.P., Arsoy D., Sierra R.J. et al. High failure rate of modular exchange with a specific design of a constrained liner in high-risk patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthropasty. 2016; 31 (9): 1963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.021.
  61. Hernigou P., Filippini P., Flouzat-Lachaniette C.H. et al. Constrained liner in neurologic or cognitively impaired patients undergoing primary THA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010; 468 (12): 3255-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1340-6.
  62. Hernigou P., Ratte L., Roubineau F. et al. The risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty for fractures is decreased with retentive cups. Int. Orthop. 2013; 37 (7): 1219-23. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1911-8.
  63. Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V. Jr., Mallory T.H. et al. The long-term outcome of 755 consecutive constrained acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty examining the successes and failures. J. Arthropasty. 2005; 20 (7 Suppl 3): 93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.06.001.
  64. Della Valle C.J., Chang D., Sporer S. et al. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthropasty. 2005; 20 (7 Suppl 3): 103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.005.
  65. Zywiel M.G., Mustafa L.H., Bonutti P.M., Mont M.A. Are abductor muscle quality and previous revision surgery predictors of constrained liner failure in hip arthroplasty? Int. Orthop. 2011; 35 (6): 797-802. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-0962-3.
  66. Mäkinen T.J., Fichman S.G., Rahman W.A. et al. The focally constrained liner is a reasonable option for revision of unstable total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2016; 40 (11): 2239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3082-2.
  67. De Martino I., Triantafyllopoulos G.K., Sculco P.K., Sculco T.P. Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty. World J. Orthop. 2014; 5 (3): 180-7. doi: 10.5312/wjo. v5.i3.180.
  68. Chughtai M., Mistry J.B., Diedrich A.M. et al. Low frequency of early complications with dual-mobility acetabular cups in cementless primary THA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016; 474 (10): 2181-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4811-6.
  69. Mohammed R., Hayward K., Mulay S. et al. Outcomes of dual-mobility acetabular cup for instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2015; 16 (1): 9-13. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0324-9.
  70. Philippot R., Boyer B., Farizon F. Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013; 471 (3): 965-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2639-2.
  71. Combes A., Migaud H., Girard J. et al. Low rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013; 471 (12): 3891-900. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2929-3.
  72. Maisongrosse P., Lepage B., Cavaignac E. et al. Obesity is no longer a risk factor for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with a double-mobility cup. Int. Orthop. 2015; 39 (7): 1251-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2612-7.
  73. Adam P., Philippe R., Ehlinger M. et al. Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2012; 98 (3): 296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.005.
  74. Epinette J.A. Clinical outcomes, survivorship and adverse events with mobile-bearings versus fixed-bearings in hip arthroplasty a prospective comparative cohort study of 143 ADM versus 130 trident cups at 2 to 6-year follow-up. J. Arthroplasty. 2015; 30 (2): 241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.022.
  75. Wegrzyn J., Tebaa E., Jacquel A. et al. Can dual mobility cups prevent dislocation in all situations after revision total hip arthroplasty? J. Arthroplasty. 2015; 30 (4): 631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.034.
  76. Plummer D.R., Christy J.M., Sporer S.M. et al. Dualmobility articulations for patients at high risk for dislocation. J. Arthropasty. 2016; 31 (9 Suppl): 131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.021.
  77. Guyen O., Pibarot V., Vaz G. et al. Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 467 (2): 465-72. doi: 10.1007/ s11999-008-0476-0.
  78. HailerN.P.,WeissR.J.,StarkA.,KärrholmJ.Dual-mobility cups for revision due to instability are associated with a low rate of re-revisions due to dislocation. Acta Orthop.2012; 83 (6): 566-71. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.742395.

Copyright (c) 2017 Eco-Vector



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies