Evaluation of the effectiveness of preoperative halo-traction in patients with severe spinal deformities using dynamography

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment is the main method of treatment for patients with severe forms of idiopathic scoliosis. In severe spinal deformities, halo-traction can be used as a preoperative preparation stage. However, it is difficult to assess the results of traction preparation in rigid deformities. Nevertheless, the Tergumed Pegasus 3D biofeedback device can be used to assess changes in spinal mobility.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative halo-traction preparation in patients with severe spinal deformities using dynamography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively analysed the results of 15 patients with severe spinal scoliotic deformities preoperatively. All patients received halo-traction while standing in a walking frame or sitting in a wheelchair as a preoperative preparation. We calculated the deformity mobility index, measured the volume of movement and static strength of spinal muscles in three planes using the dynamographic method before and after traction preparation. The data were statistically analysed using the Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS: Changes in the mobility index before and after preoperative preparation were statistically insignificant (p >0.05). Analysis of changes in the spinal movement volume revealed an increase in the range of motion in almost all dimensions, except for extension and lateral bending to the convex side of the deformity. A statistically significant increase in the movement volume was observed in axial rotations to the convex and concave sides of the deformity, and in lateral bends to the concave side (p <0.05), while spinal flexion showed a statistically insignificant improvement. The study of static spinal muscle strength showed an increase in strength in all angles, but statistically significant changes were found in lateral bending to the convex and concave sides, turning to the convex side, and back extension.

CONCLUSION: The data obtained demonstrate an increase in the strength of the spinal muscles after halo-gravity training, as well as an increase in mobility. Dynamography has been shown to be effective in assessing preoperative halotraction preparation in patients with severe spinal deformities, but further studies with a higher level of evidence are required.

作者简介

Sergey Kolesov

Priorov National Medical Research Center

Email: dr-kolesov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9657-8584
SPIN 代码: 1989-6994

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Mikhail Tsykunov

Priorov National Medical Research Center

Email: rehcito@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0994-8602
SPIN 代码: 8298-8338

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Samir Bagirov

Priorov National Medical Research Center

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: bagirov.samir22@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1038-1815
SPIN 代码: 9620-7038
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Arkadii Kazmin

Priorov National Medical Research Center Moscow

Email: kazmin.cito@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2330-0172
SPIN 代码: 4944-4173

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Vladimir Pereverzev

Priorov National Medical Research Center

Email: vcpereverz@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6895-8288
SPIN 代码: 8164-1389

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Kolesov SV. Surgery of spinal deformities. Mironov SP, editor. Moscow: Author’s Academy; 2014. 272 p. (In Russ).
  2. Mikhailovsky MV. Stages of development of vertebral surgery: a historical digression. Spine surgery. 2004;(1):10–24. (In Russ).
  3. Adambaev ZI, Kilichev IA. Traction therapy (literature review). Achievements of science and education. 2017;20(7). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/traktsionnaya-terapiya-obzor-literatury. Accessed: 29.03.2023. (In Russ).
  4. Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(1):3–9. doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4
  5. Comité Nacional de Adolescencia SAP; Comité de Diagnóstico por Imágenes SAP; Sociedad Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología Infantil; Sociedad Argentina de Patología de la Columna Vertebral (SAPCV); Comité de Diagnóstico por Imágenes; Colaboradores. Consenso de escoliosis idiopática del adolescente [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016;114(6):585–594. (In Spanish). doi: 10.5546/aap.2016.585
  6. Willner S, Udén A. A prospective prevalence study of scoliosis in Southern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53(2):233–7. doi: 10.3109/17453678208992208
  7. Carter OD, Haynes SG. Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: results from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Epidemiol. 1987;16(4):537–44. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.4.537
  8. Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, Farcy JP. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(9):1082–5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd
  9. Kazmin AI, Fishchenko VYa. Discotomy (Etiology, pathogenesis and treatment of scoliosis). Moscow: Medicine; 1974. 200 p. (In Russ).
  10. Jalilov YaR. Complex orthopedic and surgical treatment of scoliotic disease. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2002;9(3):47–52. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/vto99941
  11. Vetrile ST, Kuleshov AA, Shvets VV. Comparative analysis of the results of surgical treatment of scoliosis using the Harrington distractor in combination with the Luque method and the Cotrel-Dubousset system. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 1999;6(2):7–15. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/vto104799
  12. Vetrile ST, Shvets VV, Kuleshov AA. Results of surgical treatment of patients with scoliosis according to Harrington in various combinations with other methods. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Othopedics. 1996;3(1):3–6. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/vto64039
  13. Vetrile ST, Kisel AA, Kuleshov AA. Evaluation of the effectiveness of single-stage surgical correction of scoliotic spinal deformity with Cotrel — Dubousset tools. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Othopedics. 2004;11(4):58–68. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/vto200411458-67
  14. Kuleshov AA. Severe forms of scoliosis. Surgical treatment and functional features of some organs and systems [dissertation]. Moscow; 2007. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/tyazhelye-formy-skolioza-operativnoe-lechenie-i-funktsionalnye-osobennosti-nekotorykh-organo?ysclid=lp5ogu1eyk942975917 (In Russ).
  15. Cheung KM, Luk KD. Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(8):1144–50. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199708000-00005
  16. Kleinman RG, Csongradi JJ, Rinksy LA, Bleck EE. The radiographic assessment of spinal flexibility in scoliosis: a study of the efficacy of the prone push film. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(162):47–53.
  17. Hamzaoglu A, Ozturk C, Aydogan M, Tezer M, Aksu N, Bruno MB. Posterior only pedicle screw instrumentation with intraoperative halo-femoral traction in the surgical treatment of severe scoliosis (>100 degrees). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(9):979–83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b17
  18. White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1978.
  19. Polly DW Jr, Sturm PF. Traction versus supine side bending. Which technique best determines curve flexibility? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(7):804–8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199804010-00013
  20. Vaughan JJ, Winter RB, Lonstein JE. Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(21):2469–73. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00012
  21. Rinella A, Lenke L, Whitaker C, Kim Y, Park SS, Peelle M, Edwards C 2nd, Bridwell K. Perioperative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(4):475–82. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153707.80497.a2
  22. Sucato DJ. Management of severe spinal deformity: scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(25):2186–92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181feab19
  23. Shi B, Liu D, Shi B, Li Y, Xia S, Jiang E, Qiu Y, Zhu Z. A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction and Postoperative Halo-Femoral Traction After Posterior Spinal Release in Corrective Surgery for Severe Kyphoscoliosis. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e919281. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919281
  24. Qiao J, Xiao L, Sun X, Liu Z, Zhu Z, Qian B, Qiu Y. Three column osteotomy for adult spine deformity: comparison of outcomes and complications between kyphosis and kyphoscoliosis. Br J Neurosurg. 2018;32(1):32–36. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1427214
  25. Kandwal P, Vijayaraghavan GP, Nagaraja UB, Jayaswal A. Severe Rigid Scoliosis: Review of Management Strategies and Role of Spinal Osteotomies. Asian Spine J. 2017;11(3):494–503. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.494
  26. Sazhnev ML. Surgical treatment of scoliotic deformity using Smith-Petersen ostomy [dissertation]. Moscow; 2013. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/khirurgicheskoe-lechenie-skolioticheskoi-deformatsii-s-ispolzovaniem-osteotomii-po-smit-pete?ysclid=lp5ox8bkut432207374 (In Russ).
  27. Mehrpour S, Sorbi R, Rezaei R, Mazda K. Posterior-only surgery with preoperative skeletal traction for management of severe scoliosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137(4):457–463. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2642-x
  28. Yang C, Wang H, Zheng Z, Zhang Z, Wang J, Liu H, Kim YJ, Cho S. Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(7):1810–1816. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4848-y
  29. McIntosh AL, Ramo BS, Johnston CE. Halo Gravity Traction for Severe Pediatric Spinal Deformity: A Clinical Concepts Review. Spine Deform. 2019;7(3):395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.068
  30. Stevens VK, Parlevliet TG, Coorevits PL, Mahieu NN, Bouche KG, Vanderstraeten GG, Daneels LA. The effect of increasing resistance on trunk muscle activity during extension and flexion exercises on training devices. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(3):434–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.10.009
  31. De Ridder E, Danneels L, Vleeming A, Vanderstraeten G, Van Ranst M, Van Oosterwijck J. Trunk extension exercises: How is trunk extensor muscle recruitment related to the exercise dosage? J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(4):681–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.01.001
  32. Wilczyński J, Kasprzak A. Dynamics of Changes in Isometric Strength and Muscle Imbalance in the Treatment of Women with Low back Pain. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6139535. doi: 10.1155/2020/6139535
  33. Eremenko VD, Ivanova NL. Simulators «Tergumed 3D» and «Proxomed Tergumed 700»: studying the experience of use in rehabilitation for dorsopathies. In: Kolokoltsev MM, editor. Materials of the IV Student correspondence International scientific conference dedicated to the 85th anniversary of the education of IrSTU «Physical culture and sport — the basis of the health of the nation»; April 27–29 2015; Irkutsk. Volume 2. Irkutsk: Irkutsk National Research Technical University; 2015. Р. 772–776. (In Russ).
  34. Lupandina-Bolotova GS, Polyakov SD, Korneeva IT. The method of stabilometry in assessing the dynamics of functional vertebral changes in children aged 12–16 years when used in the rehabilitation complex of the therapeutic and diagnostic system «Tergumed 3D». Therapeutic physical culture and sports medicine. 2011;12(96):36–40. (In Russ).
  35. Lupandina-Bolotova GS, Korneeva IT, Polyakov SD. Therapeutic and diagnostic system «Tergumed 3D» in the complex rehabilitation of adolescents with functional vertebral disorders. Modern medicine: topical issues. 2013;(25):115–122. (In Russ).
  36. Lupandina-Bolotova GS, Taybulatov NI, Ignatov DA, et al. Functional disorders in spinal deformities and methods of their correction. Issues of modern pediatrics. 2015;14(2):201–206. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vsp.v14i2.1287
  37. Schaar H, Simon J, Mattes K. Reliability of isometric maximum strength tests of the trunk with elite athletes at the CTT-Pegasus®. 8th WCPAS. Germany, Magdeburg; 2008. P. 3–6.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The position of patient X. in the device

下载 (197KB)
3. Fig. 2. The results of the research of patient X

下载 (288KB)

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2023

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##