Total resection of the symphysis pubis in a patient with postpartum symphysitis: clinical case

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complete rupture of the symphysis during childbirth is a rare but serious complication, with a frequency of 0.03%–3%. Small partial tears with minor discrepancies are an indication of conservative therapy, which only requires the use of a pelvic brace. Larger symphyseal tears should be treated with surgery and fixation.

CLINICAL CASE DESCRIPTION: This report presents a clinical case of successful orthopedic correction of symphysitis after delivery by cesarean section. A 25-year-old patient underwent total resection of the symphysis pubis with supra-acetabular fixation and external fixation device of a rod arrangement for 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION: Several surgical techniques in combination with defect plasty with biocomposite material KollapAn-С made it possible to achieve a long-term positive result.

About the authors

Yago G. Gudushauri

Priorov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: gogich71@mail.ru

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Traumatologist-Orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Malkhaz G. Kakabadze

Priorov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: malkhaz@mail.ru

MD, Cand., Sci. (Med.), Traumatologist-Orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anatoly F. Lazarev

Priorov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: lazarev.anatoly@gmail.com

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Traumatologist-Orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vyacheslav V. Konovalov

Priorov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics

Author for correspondence.
Email: slava2801@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8954-9192
SPIN-code: 9552-2408

Graduate Student, Traumatologist-Orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Evgeny I. Kalinin

Priorov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: Kalinin_evgeny@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2766-5670
SPIN-code: 6659-2285

Graduate Student, Traumatologist-Orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ivan N. Marychev

Priorov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: dr.ivan.marychev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5268-4972
SPIN-code: 9151-7883

Graduate Student, Traumatologist-Orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Dyatlov MM. Slozhnye povrezhdeniya taza. Chto delat’? Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei i studentov. Gomel’: GomGMU; 2006. (In Russ).
  2. Lazarev AF, Gudushauri YG, Kostiv EP, et al. Challenging issues of the doctrine of the pelvis polytrauma. Pacific Medical Journal. 2017;1:17–23. (In Russ). doi: 10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2017.1.17-233
  3. Gudushayri YG, Lazarev AF, Verzin AV. Surgical Correction of the Sequelae of Obstetric Pubic Symphysis Ruptures. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2014;21(4):15–21. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/vto20140415-21
  4. Lazarev AF, Solod EI, Gudushauri YG, et al. Problems with fixing chronic injuries of the anterior pelvic ring. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2021;28(3):5–12. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/vto89514
  5. Lazarev AF, Verzin AV, Solod EI, et al. Urologicheskie problemy posledstvii povrezhdeniya perednego polukol’tsa taza. Proceedings of the III International Pirogov Student Scientific Medical Conference «Osteosintez i endoprotezirovanie»; 2008 March 20; Moscow. Available from: https://pirogovka.rsmu.ru/fileadmin/templates/DOC/Conferences/Pirogovka/Sbornik_tezisov_2008.pdf. Accessed: 20.12.2022. (In Russ).
  6. Stel’makh KK. Lechenie nestabil’nykh povrezhdenii taza. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2005;38(4):31–38. (In Russ).
  7. Seth S, Das B, Salhan S. A severe case of pubic symphysis diastasis in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;106(2):230–232. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00221-x
  8. Gudushauri YaG. Operativnoe lechenie oslozhnennykh perelomov kostei taza [dissertation]. Moscow; 2016. Available from: https://www.cito-priorov.ru/cito/dissovet/36/%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%20%D0%93%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B0%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8-1.pdf. Accessed: 20.12.2022. (In Russ).
  9. Mikhel’son AF, Topolyan HA, Volkov AE. Printsipy vedeniya bol’nykh s poslerodovymi simfizitami. Collection of Scientific Works «Aktual’nye voprosy akusherstva i ginekologii»; 2001–2002; Moscow. Vol. 1, N 1. P. 55–56. (In Russ).
  10. Kozlov LA, Klyucharov IV. Changes of the pubic joint in obstetric practice: terminology, classification, diagnosis, and medical tactics. Kazan medical journal. 1997;78(3):218–220. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/kazmj81508
  11. Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989;71(2):304–306. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925751
  12. Norvilaite K, Kezeviciute M, Ramasauskaitė D, et al. Postpartum pubic symphysis diastasis-conservative and surgical treatment methods, incidence of complications: Two case reports and a review of the literature. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(1):110–119. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.110
  13. Waikakul S, Soparat K, Harnroongroj T. Anterior stabilization in the pubic symphysis separation: a mechanical testing. J Med Assoc Thai. 1999;82(1):72–79.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Plain radiograph of the pelvic bones of patient S. Diastasis between the lumbar bones is more than 4 cm, there is a fuzziness of the articular surfaces of the pubic bones due to superficial bone erosion, a symmetrical spread of the process at different distances from the pubic symphysis.

Download (107KB)
3. Fig. 2. Radiographs of patient S. after surgery: total resection of the pubic rami, replacement of the defect with plastic material Kollapan S, stabilization of the pelvic ring with an external fixation device of the MCC rod structure: a) straight line; b) caudal; and c) cranial projections.

Download (169KB)
4. Fig. 3. Radiographs of patient S. 4 months after operation.

Download (185KB)
5. Fig. 4. Appearance of patient S. after 4 months after operation.

Download (357KB)
6. Fig. 5. Radiographs of the pelvis (cranial, straight and caudal) of patient S. 4 years after surgery.

Download (159KB)
7. Fig. 6. Appearance of the patient S. 4 years after surgery.

Download (205KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Gudushauri Y.G., Kakabadze M.G., Lazarev A.F., Konovalov V.V., Kalinin E.I., Marychev I.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies